"Flying too High" by Steven Pomper

Holy cow. A friend of mine (a like minded person who wants GA to be
professionalized and regulated -- no its not regulated now) just referred
me to this excellent piece of journalism. A bit dated, to be sure, but
still relevant. (Ironic that this was being written at the same time GA
schools were training the Saudi terrorists who flew into the WTC.)

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/fea...10.pomper.html

"Skylune" wrote in
lkaboutaviation.com:

Holy cow. A friend of mine (a like minded person who wants GA to be
professionalized and regulated -- no its not regulated now) just referred
me to this excellent piece of journalism. A bit dated, to be sure, but
still relevant. (Ironic that this was being written at the same time GA
schools were training the Saudi terrorists who flew into the WTC.)

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/fea...10.pomper.html




Ah, your in the wrong thread, this belongs in the "Troll of the year
award" thread.

--
-- ET :-)

"A common mistake people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools."---- Douglas Adams

"ET" wrote in message
...

Ah, your in the wrong thread, this belongs in the "Troll of the year
award" thread.


Skylune declared himself ineligible for that award.

ET wrote

Ah, your in the wrong thread, this belongs in the "Troll of the year
award" thread.

And perhaps your's belongs in the English Challenged thread! "You're"
is the correct contraction for "you are".

Bob Moore

Bob Moore wrote in
. 121:

ET wrote

Ah, your in the wrong thread, this belongs in the "Troll of the year
award" thread.

And perhaps your's belongs in the English Challenged thread! "You're"
is the correct contraction for "you are".

Bob Moore


So the spelling and grammer police have nothing to do today eh??? git a
live!

yes I did it on porpose... yeah that one two.., oh, and that one

--
-- ET :-)

"A common mistake people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools."---- Douglas Adams

Bob Moore wrote:
ET wrote

Ah, your in the wrong thread, this belongs in the "Troll of the year
award" thread.

And perhaps your's belongs in the English Challenged thread! "You're"
is the correct contraction for "you are".

What is this, a meeting of the Two Stooges of grammar? Curly, meet Moe.
Moe, meet Curly. There are no apostrophes in possessive personal pronouns.
It should be "yours" not "your's."

Pesky Irritant wrote in
:

Bob Moore wrote:
ET wrote

Ah, your in the wrong thread, this belongs in the "Troll of the year
award" thread.

And perhaps your's belongs in the English Challenged thread!
"You're" is the correct contraction for "you are".

What is this, a meeting of the Two Stooges of grammar? Curly, meet
Moe. Moe, meet Curly. There are no apostrophes in possessive personal
pronouns. It should be "yours" not "your's."



HA! touche!
--
-- ET :-)

"A common mistake people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools."---- Douglas Adams

Pesky Irritant wrote

It should be "yours" not "your's."

I don't believe that I did that!

Bob

Bob Moore wrote:

ET wrote

Ah, your in the wrong thread, this belongs in the "Troll of the year
award" thread.

And perhaps your's belongs in the English Challenged thread! "You're"
is the correct contraction for "you are".

Bob Moore

Then again, there's no apostrophe in "yours"! g

USENET rule: Any post correcting spelling or grammer must contain at
least one such mistake.

I'm safe.
--
Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently.

I'm not going to bight.

"alexy" wrote in message
...
Bob Moore wrote:

USENET rule: Any post correcting spelling or grammer must contain at
least one such mistake.

I'm safe.