A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why is a picture ID opposed for voting?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old August 12th 12, 09:56 PM posted to alt.global-warming,rec.aviation.piloting
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 824
Default Why is a picture ID opposed for voting?

In article
,
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote:

On Aug 12, 1:13*pm, wrote:" you have zero
knowledge, like how polling places work."


"S.F. poll worker sentenced for stealing ballots" he was found the
next day at his home with "multipage ballots, the voter roster, a
memory card that recorded the votes cast, a voting machine access key
and a poll worker's cell phone, police said."



http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/...r-stealing-bal
lots-2333835.php
"

S.F. poll worker sentenced for stealing ballots
He had with him multipage ballots, the voter roster, a memory card
that recorded the votes cast, a voting machine access key and a poll
worker's cell phone, police said.
Nicholas was arrested at his home in the Ingleside early the next
morning, and about 75 ballots were found in the lagoon two days after
election day.
He pleaded guilty in December to unlawfully carrying away or
destroying a poll list and ballots, in violation of the state
elections code"

http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jan...tion/na-ohio25
Ohio poll workers convicted
January 25, 2007|From the Associated Press
CLEVELAND ‹ Two election workers were convicted Wednesday of rigging a
recount of the 2004 presidential election to avoid a more thorough
review in Ohio's most populous county.
Jacqueline Maiden, elections coordinator of the Cuyahoga County
Elections Board, and ballot manager Kathleen Dreamer each were
convicted of a felony count of negligent misconduct by an elections
employee. They also were convicted of one misdemeanor count each of
failure to perform their duty as elections employees."


Isn't it amazing that those were DEMOCRAT officials! I'm sure that they
were opposed to positive voter ID, too.
  #22  
Old August 12th 12, 10:28 PM posted to alt.global-warming,rec.aviation.piloting
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 48
Default Why is a picture ID opposed for voting?

On Aug 12, 1:56*pm, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:" Isn't it amazing that those were DEMOCRAT officials"

Non relevant reply noted, as my link establishes the fact the polling
place is not as secure as some would like to think. Now please cite
your non-relevant assertion if you want it to be taken seriously, as
the secretary of state from ohio between 1999-2007 was a republican J.
Kenneth Blackwell, appointment of county board elections officials
falls under his discretion.

http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jan...tion/na-ohio25
Ohio poll workers convicted
January 25, 2007|From the Associated Press
CLEVELAND — Two election workers were convicted Wednesday of rigging a
recount of the 2004 presidential election to avoid a more thorough
review in Ohio's most populous county.
Jacqueline Maiden, elections coordinator of the Cuyahoga County
Elections Board, and ballot manager Kathleen Dreamer each were
convicted of a felony count of negligent misconduct by an elections
employee. They also were convicted of one misdemeanor count each of
failure to perform their duty as elections employees."
  #23  
Old August 12th 12, 10:53 PM posted to alt.global-warming,rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Why is a picture ID opposed for voting?

In rec.aviation.piloting columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:
On Aug 12, 1:13Â*pm, wrote:" you have zero
knowledge, like how polling places work."



"S.F. poll worker sentenced for stealing ballots" he was found the
next day at his home with "multipage ballots, the voter roster, a
memory card that recorded the votes cast, a voting machine access key
and a poll worker's cell phone, police said."


Good lord, you are a scatter brained idiot.

Neither of your stories has anything to do with identity theft, one story
has nothing to do with polling places, and the remaining story illustrates
just how hard it is to get away with any funny business in a polling place.


  #24  
Old August 12th 12, 10:56 PM posted to alt.global-warming,rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Why is a picture ID opposed for voting?

In rec.aviation.piloting columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:
On Aug 12, 1:56Â*pm, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:" Isn't it amazing that those were DEMOCRAT officials"

Non relevant reply noted, as my link establishes the fact the polling
place is not as secure as some would like to think. Now please cite
your non-relevant assertion if you want it to be taken seriously, as
the secretary of state from ohio between 1999-2007 was a republican J.
Kenneth Blackwell, appointment of county board elections officials
falls under his discretion.

http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jan...tion/na-ohio25
Ohio poll workers convicted
January 25, 2007|From the Associated Press
CLEVELAND — Two election workers were convicted Wednesday of rigging a
recount of the 2004 presidential election to avoid a more thorough
review in Ohio's most populous county.
Jacqueline Maiden, elections coordinator of the Cuyahoga County
Elections Board, and ballot manager Kathleen Dreamer each were
convicted of a felony count of negligent misconduct by an elections
employee. They also were convicted of one misdemeanor count each of
failure to perform their duty as elections employees."



This has nothing to do with identity theft and nothing to do with polling
places.

The crimes occured days after the election was over.

You are a scatter brained idiot.



  #25  
Old August 12th 12, 10:58 PM posted to alt.global-warming,rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default OT Why is a picture ID opposed for voting?

In rec.aviation.piloting columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:
On Aug 12, 10:16Â*am, wrote:"In addition,
there are monitors in the room to ensure everyone is doing what they
are supposed to be doing. This scenario is just as unrealistic as
being able to copy voter information in the polling place."

Whats unrealistic is your false sense of security, ohio went to bush
in 2004.

http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jan...tion/na-ohio25


How many times do you have to be told that this has nothing to do with
identity theft and nothing to do with polling places?

This crime occured days after the election and had to do with cherry
picking votes in an attempt to influence a recount.

You are a scatter brained idiot.



  #26  
Old August 12th 12, 11:02 PM posted to alt.global-warming,rec.aviation.piloting
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 48
Default OT Why is a picture ID opposed for voting?

On Aug 12, 2:58*pm, wrote:How many times do
you have to be told that this has nothing to do with identity theft
and nothing to do with polling places?"

your fallacies are not my follies, you say that bs above all you want,
but the only one you are fooling is yourself.

Mandating that a voter show a picture id (driver’s license being the
most common) reveals, name, date of birth, address, driver’s license #
(if card is used), at a place where the voters name and address are
found on a printed list. You are creating a focal point for personal
information, a potential situation for a person/group of people to
stealn formation, based on a mandate that all walk in voters share
personal information. That focal point is a place where close to 70%
of the total voting population will be revealing their personal
information in a 1-day window. The total popular vote for president
in 2008 was just under 130 million, the state of Missouri’s poll
worker instruction manual boasts about its 20,000 poll workers. That’s
quite an opportunity you are creating for lots of money to be stolen
(unintended consequences), based on the ideal of creating a 100% clean
election. Absentee ballots are subject to tampering, so to increase
mail in ballots would not assure a clean election, which means your so
called solution is nothing more than a dodge, in an effort to make
walk in voting 100% clean, you just skipped over the other option,
which is not 100% clean. You did this by using with the statement.
Everything is subject to tampering and that is an entirely separate
issue.” which is an illogical fallacy, based on the fact you are
trying to clean up the election process. Such poor logic on your
part begs the question as to why you think the poll volunteer vetting
process is not subject to flaws/mistakes/misses/tampering. In fact
when pushed your only assurance that identity theft will not occur at
the polling place is that "anal little old ladies" are on duty, which
is pure idiocy on your part. Identity theft protection includes
shredding waste that contains important information so people who go
through a households *TRASH*, have a harder time stealing your
identity. The typical household waste contains food/dog/cat/toiletries
along with the personal information we are told to shred, this sits
and stews a week before it goes to the curb. With today’s cell phone
cameras, one only needs a press of a button to capture an image of the
voter roll (address and voters name), and a good memory for numbers
when inspecting the photo id, to gather such crucial personal
information. So if people are willing to go through a person’s week
  #27  
Old August 13th 12, 12:12 AM posted to alt.global-warming,rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default OT Why is a picture ID opposed for voting?

In rec.aviation.piloting columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:
On Aug 12, 2:58Â*pm, wrote:How many times do
you have to be told that this has nothing to do with identity theft
and nothing to do with polling places?"

your fallacies are not my follies, you say that bs above all you want,
but the only one you are fooling is yourself.


Babbling gibberish.

Mandating that a voter show a picture id (driver’s license being the
most common) reveals, name, date of birth, address, driver’s license #
(if card is used), at a place where the voters name and address are
found on a printed list.


Yep, we have agreed to that so why do you keep repeating it like a
babbling idiot?

However, there is no realistic way that mass identity theft can occur
at a polling place, all your links show how difficult it is to perform
any sort of mischief related to voting, and you have no realistic
scenario of how such identity theft could possibly occur.

You just keep arm waving and posting links with nothing to do with
identity theft.




  #28  
Old August 15th 12, 01:59 PM posted to alt.global-warming,rec.aviation.piloting
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 48
Default OT Why is a picture ID opposed for voting?

On Aug 12, 1:56*pm, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:" Isn't it amazing that those were DEMOCRAT officials! I'm sure
that they were opposed to positive voter ID, too."



still waiting for the proof of who was a democrat. Im curious, did
you make a knee jerk assumption as to what part the criminals came
from?

  #29  
Old August 15th 12, 04:51 PM posted to alt.global-warming,rec.aviation.piloting
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 824
Default OT Why is a picture ID opposed for voting?

In article
,
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote:

On Aug 12, 1:56*pm, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:" Isn't it amazing that those were DEMOCRAT officials! I'm sure
that they were opposed to positive voter ID, too."



still waiting for the proof of who was a democrat. Im curious, did
you make a knee jerk assumption as to what part the criminals came
from?


As a 19th Century politician remarked: "I don't say that all Democrats
are horse thieves, but I DO say that all horse thieves are Democrat!"

Those areas which you cited are Democrat-controlled, so the officials
HAD to be Democrats.

BTW -- I id poll watcher duty yesterday here in FL, where we practice
voter ID. The voter walks up to the official, who slides the driver's
license through a scanner, which is tied to the Registrar and verifies
ID, after the official checks the photo. The voter then signs an
electronic signature (similar to the CC setup in supermarkets). The
official then hands a ballot to the person, who then votes.

Amazingly, the signature looks like your real signature, unlike the
supermarket scanners.

The process works very smoothly and more efficiently than the old paper
lists.

If somebody had receives an absentee ballot, the clerk called the
Registrar to cancel the voter's absentee and allowed the voter to vote.

Only one fool grumped about ID theft.
  #30  
Old August 15th 12, 05:43 PM posted to alt.global-warming,rec.aviation.piloting
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 48
Default OT Why is a picture ID opposed for voting?

On Aug 15, 8:51*am, Orval Fairbairn wrote:
In article
,
*columbiaaccidentinvestigation

wrote:
On Aug 12, 1:56 pm, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:" Isn't it amazing that those were DEMOCRAT officials! I'm sure
that they *were opposed to positive voter ID, too."


still waiting for the proof of who was a democrat. *Im curious, did
you make a knee jerk assumption as to what part the criminals came
from?


As a 19th Century politician remarked: "I don't say that all Democrats
are horse thieves, but I DO say that all horse thieves are Democrat!"

Those areas which you cited are Democrat-controlled, so the officials
HAD to be Democrats.


False assumption, in fact the secretary of state who approved a county
official that spoke in favor of the accused is now running a
conservative superpac. No proof on your part noted.

BTW -- I id poll watcher duty yesterday here in FL, where we practice
voter ID. The voter walks up to the official, who slides the driver's
license through a scanner, which is tied to the Registrar and verifies
ID, after the official checks the photo. The voter then signs an
electronic signature (similar to the CC setup in supermarkets). The
official then hands a ballot to the person, who then votes.


Good job, so are you able to keep your idiotic assertions away from
the polling place, as you seem to think you can act any way you want
here? Are you claiming no id theft can occur when a person takes your
card for scanning?


Amazingly, the signature looks like your real signature, unlike the
supermarket scanners.

The process works very smoothly and more efficiently than the old paper
lists.

If somebody had receives an absentee ballot, the clerk called the
Registrar to cancel the voter's absentee and allowed the voter to vote.

Only one fool grumped about ID theft.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT "Why is a picture ID opposed for voting?" columbiaaccidentinvestigation Piloting 27 August 16th 12 09:49 PM
Why is a picture ID opposed for voting? columbiaaccidentinvestigation Piloting 8 August 12th 12 10:50 PM
military and overseas voting [email protected] Military Aviation 6 September 25th 04 08:25 AM
Gravel as opposed to aspalt runway Jay Honeck Owning 5 January 24th 04 01:40 AM
Add your picture! Jay Honeck Owning 0 November 26th 03 05:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.