If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"John Godwin" wrote in message . 3.44... I wouldn't have a problem if Paulo decides to put small advertising banners at the top of the page, after all, many other websites have done this and running the site isn't free. Removing certain FBOs takes AirNav down to the level of corporate sites (such as Millionaire, Signature, etc.) where you'll see nothing but fluff. I've noticed Signature and Millionaire frequently get savaged for their pompous attitudes and high prices in AirNav's user comments. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paulo liable for maintaining a forum where other people can post unedited
comments? Mike MU-2 "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:IQeSb.51817$U%5.286038@attbi_s03... One other issue I have with Airnav's new direction is what will Paulo do about a crappy business that offers poor service or rips off customers? If they pay their advertising fee, do they get negative comments removed from their listing? If not, why would they pay? I've wondered about that myself. Actually, I've always wondered how Paulo has survived putting negative comments on his website, without getting sued. There are some pretty graphic and acidic posts about some businesses. Someone with a mouth-piece and deep pockets could make Paulo's life very uncomfortable. Right after we bought the hotel, I found a bad review of our place on AirNav. It was, of course (!), from before we bought the place, and was a really nasty one, written by a guy who claimed that he was "told by a line-guy to avoid the place." Paulo of course removed it from his site when he heard we were the new owners, but THAT'S the kind of third-hand slander that could really get him in hot water, IMHO. I feel for Paulo. He's operated this website full-time for a couple of years, basically "on the house." Now that he's trying to actually make a buck, everyone is down his throat. I say if an FBO is too damned cheap to pay for their listing, that alone says enough to me that I will avoid the place. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Mike Rapoport wrote: Is Paulo liable for maintaining a forum where other people can post unedited comments? Last year, the host of another web site was successfully sued by Wouk over comments that someone posted on that site. George Patterson Love, n.: A form of temporary insanity afflicting the young. It is curable either by marriage or by removal of the afflicted from the circumstances under which he incurred the condition. It is sometimes fatal, but more often to the physician than to the patient. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Folks,
I normally don't follow Usene. It is fun, but I just don't have the time. So pardon my late entry into this thread. [Thanks, Victor, for telling me about the thread.] I started AirNav in 1995 and am still involved in it, although I don't run the whole show anymore. First of all, let me thank all of you on Usenet for the support you have been providing. You folks on rec.aviation.* are incredibly supportive, and I hope you will continue to be after you read this. And second, let me assure all of you that AirNav remains committed to providing incredible value to the aviation community. One thing that several of you have figured out is that AirNav needs to have a sufficient revenue stream to be viable. I don't think anybody would deny us that. Even though we would very much like to provide the service for free to everyone indefinitely, it is just not viable. A revenue stream was absolutely necessary. So we started by introducing simple and useful revenue solutions that we though would be well received by everyone. We looked at several solutions, and rolled them out over time: quality non-annoying banner ads, online hotel and car reservations, upgraded listings for FBOs that wanted it. All the while, we were providing a free Basic presence to every FBO and aviation business. It turned out that those revenue streams still weren't enough to support the site. Maybe if pilots had made more hotel reservations it would have been sufficient. The reservations they make help, but that is still not sufficient. So we did some serious soul searching and looked for a viable revenue model. Two alternatives: charge the users (pilots) or charge the advertisers (FBOs). We though that charging the pilots made the most sense, since they were the ones benefiting most directly from the site. But we conducted some surveys, and got some viscious negative reactions from the majority of pilots. It would go something like this: - Do you use AirNav? - YES, all the time. I love it. - What do you fly, how much? - I fly a Baron, 250 hours a year. - What does AirNav do for you? - I use it everytime I go somewhere. I have saved thousands of dollars by using AirNav. On this last trip alone I save $150 by filling up for $1.85 at XYZ. - Great. Would you pay $39/year to continue to use the service? [ blank stare, followed by color disappearing from pilot's face ] [ after regaining composure... ] - Are you out of your mind??? Absolutely not. I would stop using it. So, folks, there you have it, a tremendous irrational response. And this wasn't one or two people that we interviwed, it was the vast majority. Definitely something we were not expecting from the community of pilots. In asking the FBOs how they felt about being charged they were more reasonable. Well, more of them anyway, but still not 100%. They have more of a business-minded approach to it, and as long as the rates are affordable, charging the FBOs is a reasonable thing. So we implemented that. We charge very reasonable rates to make sure that no aviation business is left out for lack of affordability. We have different rates at different airports to give everyone a fair chance. An FBO at Bubba Jones Cropdusting Strip is going to pay a lot less than an FBO at Big City Executive Airport. Our rates start at under $10/month at every airport except the nation's top 80 airports, and can be as little as $10/year at Bubba Jones's Strip. We give significant discounts to non-profits (flying clubs, etc.), and to small businesses that just can't hope to have the volume of an FBO (airport restaurants, etc.). Can any FBO or business claim not to be able to afford it? Can they do it straight-faced? So what are we doing to the businesses that don't pay? We typically take out all their information, except their name, phone number, fuel prices, and user comments. (To those business that order services from us, promise to pay, and then fail to pay their bills, well, those we remove altogether -- but you wouldn't want to do business with those guys anyway.). It is not our intention to diminish the value of the service we provide to the aviation community, but unfortunately we have to distinguish between the non-payers and those that believe in us and the service we provide. Continuing with the old model was just not viable because AirNav would disappear altogether, and that is no way to provide a valuable service to the community. What can you as pilots do? Tell our sponsoring FBOs that you appreciate their sponsorship. The FBOs need feedback to tell them that their advertising dollars are being well spent. And to those FBOs that don't sponsor AirNav, you should make it clear to them that you use AirNav, and that AirNav plays a role in your FBO selection process. They'll get the message. I will follow up to some of the others posts in this thread separately. Thanks for your support, and we look forward to your comments and insight. Paulo Santos AirNav, LLC http://www.airnav.com/ |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:IQeSb.51817$U%5.286038@attbi_s03...
I feel for Paulo. He's operated this website full-time for a couple of years, basically "on the house." Now that he's trying to actually make a buck, everyone is down his throat. I say if an FBO is too damned cheap to pay for their listing, that alone says enough to me that I will avoid the place. Don't get me wrong. I think that Paulo has done an incredible job with Airnav. I tell anyone who will listen that it is the best aviation site on the web. I also think he should make a buck on this venture (lots of them, actually). I just think that his current strategy will degrade the quality of the site. There are lots of good mom & pop FBOs that are run on a shoestring and don't do any advertising. That doesn't make them bad. You might be content to avoid anyone who does not pay for an Airnav listing, but if half of the FBOs disappear from the site, will it be as useful as it once was? I don't think so. Ultimately, it's Paulo's call. Personally, I'd be glad to pay an annual subscription fee to access Airnav. It's a valuable resource to me. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Is Paulo liable for maintaining a forum where other people can post
unedited comments? I dunno -- it's a gray area. But if it were me, just from a business standpoint I'd be pretty worried about allowing third-hand, unverifiable attack-posts. I'd at least want a way to verify who was making the complaint, so as to ensure that it's not just a disgruntled former employee posting stuff. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... Mike MU-2 "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:IQeSb.51817$U%5.286038@attbi_s03... One other issue I have with Airnav's new direction is what will Paulo do about a crappy business that offers poor service or rips off customers? If they pay their advertising fee, do they get negative comments removed from their listing? If not, why would they pay? I've wondered about that myself. Actually, I've always wondered how Paulo has survived putting negative comments on his website, without getting sued. There are some pretty graphic and acidic posts about some businesses. Someone with a mouth-piece and deep pockets could make Paulo's life very uncomfortable. Right after we bought the hotel, I found a bad review of our place on AirNav. It was, of course (!), from before we bought the place, and was a really nasty one, written by a guy who claimed that he was "told by a line-guy to avoid the place." Paulo of course removed it from his site when he heard we were the new owners, but THAT'S the kind of third-hand slander that could really get him in hot water, IMHO. I feel for Paulo. He's operated this website full-time for a couple of years, basically "on the house." Now that he's trying to actually make a buck, everyone is down his throat. I say if an FBO is too damned cheap to pay for their listing, that alone says enough to me that I will avoid the place. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Just ask Mike Busch formerly (probably because of this very issue) of Avweb.
-- Roger Long Mike Rapoport wrote in message ink.net... Is Paulo liable for maintaining a forum where other people can post unedited comments? Mike MU-2 |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"Paulo Santos" wrote So we did some serious soul searching and looked for a viable revenue model. Two alternatives: charge the users (pilots) or charge the advertisers (FBOs). We though that charging the pilots made the most sense, since they were the ones benefiting most directly from the site. But we conducted some surveys, and got some viscious negative reactions from the majority of pilots. It would go something like this: - Do you use AirNav? - YES, all the time. I love it. - What do you fly, how much? - I fly a Baron, 250 hours a year. - What does AirNav do for you? - I use it everytime I go somewhere. I have saved thousands of dollars by using AirNav. On this last trip alone I save $150 by filling up for $1.85 at XYZ. - Great. Would you pay $39/year to continue to use the service? [ blank stare, followed by color disappearing from pilot's face ] [ after regaining composure... ] - Are you out of your mind??? Absolutely not. I would stop using it. Who would have thought Baron drivers were that stupid? Thanks for the info, it is about what I'd guessed. Gig Giacona www.peoamerica.net/N601WR |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
So, folks, there you have it, a tremendous irrational response. And
this wasn't one or two people that we interviwed, it was the vast majority. Definitely something we were not expecting from the community of pilots. Paulo, we've seen this same kind of irrational reaction from pilots (and non-pilots) on occasion. One encounter in particular stands out in my mind: We received a call from the airport, saying that they had a guy who needed a suite for the night. He and his wife had just arrived in his $500K Baron, and wanted to see our place cuz he'd read about it in GA News. Before I could say "hello" he started trying to chisel down the price on one of our suites. The EAA and AOPA discounts weren't enough for him -- and he eventually demanded to stay in the absolute cheapest suite we had, which, I informed him, was NOT an aviation theme suite. He said it didn't matter -- so I put him in our smallest suite for a whopping $47.95. Then, of course, after check-in he started bitching that there was no "airplane stuff" in his suite. Now, remember, we've not raised any prices from the previous owners, we've invested tens of thousands of dollars into artwork, decor, furniture, memorabilia, etc, we provide a FREE $30K van for the Baron pilot to drive, and we deliver a FREE breakfast to his suite each morning, along with the daily paper -- yet he wanted to pay "Super 8" prices. Now, when I get someone like that -- pilot or not -- I simply give them the "Motel 6" phone number, and wish them a good day. Life is too short to screw with people like that. Charge what you must to survive, Paulo. We'll stick with you! -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
In rec.aviation.owning Ben Jackson wrote:
: Well eventually he'll make it useless enough that someone else : replicates the service. I never did like the way nearby attractions : were cataloged. For example, I tried to add beach access information : for a few coastal Oregon airports, but that never turned up. Here's a way to split the difference, I think. Although it's still a "subscription service," AOPA is one organization I feel every pilot should be a member of. It's pretty trivial to *add* the user/feedback functionality to an existing site, so perhaps roll it into AOPA's site? That makes some sense, no? Of course, we'd have to convince them to buy into it. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * The prime directive of Linux: * * - learn what you don't know, * * - teach what you do. * * (Just my 20 USm$) * ************************************************** *********************** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
spaceship one | Pianome | Home Built | 169 | June 30th 04 05:47 AM |
AIRNAV not publishing fuel prices... | Bob Fry | General Aviation | 1 | February 1st 04 03:47 AM |
Yo! Fuel Tank! | Veeduber | Home Built | 15 | October 25th 03 02:57 AM |
Pumping fuel backwards through an electric fuel pump | Greg Reid | Home Built | 15 | October 7th 03 07:09 PM |
Web site for fuel prices? | Frode Berg | Owning | 3 | July 11th 03 02:38 PM |