A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

DG's latest volley



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old April 1st 10, 05:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
raulb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 79
Default DG's latest volley

In the latest DG newsletter:
http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/newsletter-138.html

As I read Dirks' comments, Weber is full of crap. I also think Weber
shot himself in the foot by publishing Dirks' comments.

As laid out by Dirks, the rules say "the latest version" of the manual
has to be used. He DOES NOT say that EASA requires it to be updated
ever, much less every year. Only that it be updated "if necessary,"
but if changes are made, then those manuals have to be made available
and used. The manuals need not be forced on people.

Dirks says,
"• Under 21.A.57 it states that the TC holder shall update all manuals
if necessary.
• Under 21.A.61 (b) it is stated that the TC must make the changes to
the
instructions of continued airworthiness (maintenance manuals)
available to all
known operators etc.." [emphasis mine]

Even when Dirks says,
"• Under M.A.401 a) it states that for all maintenance only applicable
current
maintenance data (manuals) can be used. In addition under M.A.401(c)
it states
that the person or organisation maintaining an aircraft shall ensure
that the
applicable maintenance data is current." [emphasis mine]

Dirks does not say that EASA says manuals have to updated every year.
As I read what Dirks says about MA.401 a), a 30 year manual can be as
considered current provided no safety issues or egregious errors have
come up in the mean time. A 30 year old manual with a minor typo that
does not effect safety is not an egregious error and EASA does not
require the manual to be changed.

Soooooooooo, when Weber says:
"There is the necessity always to have the valid manuals available."

He is correct. And when he says:

"This necessity does not need an A/D (Airworthiness Directive),
but it is defined in the rules of 'Part M'."

He is correct. And when he says:

"And there it is expressed absolutely clear."

Guess what! He is correct! It is just that Weber's actions are not
what is "expressed absolutely clear." As I read it, if anything is
"expressed absolutely clear" in Dirks' comments, it is that EASA is
not requiring ANY changes to the manuals.

So Friedel, put THAT in your pipe and smoke it!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DG's new requirements for older DG ships Victor Newman Soaring 2 March 1st 10 08:10 PM
DG's new requirements for older DG ships Bernie[_3_] Soaring 11 February 26th 10 05:27 PM
DG's new requirements for older DG ships jcarlyle Soaring 0 February 21st 10 10:35 PM
Latest trip Glenn[_2_] Aviation Photos 0 April 26th 07 12:23 PM
Latest update DHeitm8612 General Aviation 0 August 1st 03 02:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright İ2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.