If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Tara
wrote: Even here in liberal Massachusetts, sales of airplanes are exempt from sales/use tax. did that really happen? -- Bob Noel |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:10:30 -0500, Tara wrote:
Cripes, how do California residents continue to put up with such nonsense? Thank goodness I fled that state a few years ago. Even here in liberal Massachusetts, sales of airplanes are exempt from sales/use tax. Aren't those the same folks who in desperation elected a second rate foreign movie actor to get them out of their troubles? There ya go! They really should cut the state off with a big chain saw and allow it to float about 90 miles out into the Pacific. That would greatly increase shore line property for Oregon, Nevada and Arizona. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Stu Gotts wrote: They really should cut the state off with a big chain saw and allow it to float about 90 miles out into the Pacific. No, just the southern part. George Patterson Battle, n; A method of untying with the teeth a political knot that would not yield to the tongue. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Tara writes:
Bob Fry wrote: Not even AOPA is claiming this exempts old planes from the use tax. All it does is defer for a year the requirement that attendence at shows be documented. It does NOT defer the use tax, it does NOT defer the requirement that the aircraft be display at shows, it ONLY defers the CERTIFICATION of attendence. Frankly I applaud California for trying to crack down on this scam that old-airplane owners are trying to pull; just like they tried (but failed, I think) to crack down on the rich scammers dodging sales tax on airplanes and yachts. A truly historic vehicle, which is used only for display purposes (not for "normal" transportation), will always be exempt from the use tax. But if you own a 1965 Cessna 172, which you use for everyday pleasure and/or business flying, and simultanously try to claim it's used only for antique display, you are scamming the system and screw you. It amuses me how people will spend many hundreds or even thousands of dollars dodging the tax man, at considerable personal cost, to save $300-$500 in taxes. Cripes, how do California residents continue to put up with such nonsense? Uhm, what nonsense exactly? Thank goodness I fled that state a few years ago. California also thanks you, and offers condolences to Massachusetts. Even here in liberal Massachusetts, sales of airplanes are exempt from sales/use tax. Seems hard to believe, but I'll take your word for it. However, the above discussion is about annual personal property tax, NOT one-time sales or use tax. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
snip
: Even here in liberal Massachusetts, : sales of airplanes are exempt from sales/use tax. : Seems hard to believe, but I'll take your word for it. However, the : above discussion is about annual personal property tax, NOT one-time : sales or use tax. Yup, you can believe it. No sales/use tax on purchase of aircraft, parts, repairs, etc, etc. The only state fee left is annual "registration", which runs about $250 based on gross weight, class, and engine type (turbine or piston). The fee goes higher for larger aircraft than your typical 172. -- Aaron Coolidge |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Well lets look at the "scam" I'm running. I have a 1948 Emigh Trojan, one
of 59 built and one of seven left, It costs me 10gal. of gas and $10 admission to the "airshow", thats $2.78/per gal. for a total of $27.80 plus the $10 admission for a grand total of $37.80 per air show, times 12 airshows equal $353.60. The plane is worth 15K, so if I pay the taxes at 1% equals $150 and not show the aircraft, I will save $203.60! Sounds like a real "scam" to me! If you would like to get in on this scam e-mail me and make me an offer, the plane is yours. "Bob Fry" wrote in message ... Not even AOPA is claiming this exempts old planes from the use tax. All it does is defer for a year the requirement that attendence at shows be documented. It does NOT defer the use tax, it does NOT defer the requirement that the aircraft be display at shows, it ONLY defers the CERTIFICATION of attendence. Frankly I applaud California for trying to crack down on this scam that old-airplane owners are trying to pull; just like they tried (but failed, I think) to crack down on the rich scammers dodging sales tax on airplanes and yachts. A truly historic vehicle, which is used only for display purposes (not for "normal" transportation), will always be exempt from the use tax. But if you own a 1965 Cessna 172, which you use for everyday pleasure and/or business flying, and simultanously try to claim it's used only for antique display, you are scamming the system and screw you. It amuses me how people will spend many hundreds or even thousands of dollars dodging the tax man, at considerable personal cost, to save $300-$500 in taxes. "Gary L" writes: If AOPA was on top of this from the beginning, we wouldn't have to go through any of this, after all, the new rules were put forth by the CAA (California Assessor' Association) which should be a red flag in anybodies book. AOPA needs to get this overturned, not just delayed, think of the Tax those WarBirds are going to pay! "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... Here's some good news for California based aircraft owners: AOPA GETS HISTORICAL AIRCRAFT CLARIFICATION FROM BOE At the request of AOPA, the California Board of Equalization (BOE) has clarified recent changes to the property tax exemption for historical aircraft. This exemption is available to an original, restored, or replica aircraft that is 35 years or older. The confusion arose from changes that went into effect on January 1, requiring aircraft owners to submit certificates of attendance from events where the aircraft were on display. Now, in a letter to assessors, the BOE recommends waiving the requirement for 2004. Download the letter ( http://www.boe.ca.gov/proptaxes/pdf/lta04012.pdf ). --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Gary Lee" writes:
Well lets look at the "scam" I'm running. I have a 1948 Emigh Trojan, one of 59 built and one of seven left, snip I described the scam people do in my first post on the topic, which your plane doesn't seem like it matches. The scam is owning and flying a fairly common, but old, aircraft--say a 1960 Cessna 172--which has little if any historical, "show" value, and furthermore is used by the owner for travel other than to airshows (business and/or pleasure). This plane's usage clearly does not meet the criteria for exemption from yearly personal property tax (Section 220.5), yet the owner will claim that it does by lying about the non-airshow travel and often lying about displaying it at airshows. California is trying to at least get proof that the aircraft was shown at airshows or display events (http://www.boe.ca.gov/proptaxes/pdf/lta04012.pdf). I agree that it is often not worth the trouble of flying to 12 events and displaying the aircraft to save a few hundred dollars in taxes. This is why more and more airports are putting on monthly "events" where the owners display their old planes at their home airport. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On 21 Mar 2004 10:38:56 -0800, Bob Fry
wrote: This is why more and more airports are putting on monthly "events" where the owners display their old planes at their home airport. Hey! That sounds real "win/win" to me. Owner's save a buck, and airport displays attract local and fly-in visitors. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Gary Lee" wrote in message hlink.net...
Well lets look at the "scam" I'm running. I have a 1948 Emigh Trojan, one of 59 built and one of seven left, Wow, that is a cool little plane. I haven't seen one in years. As I recall, they look kinda like an Ercoupe with a straight tail and corrugated wings. Once you've seen one, you'll never forget it. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 2 | February 2nd 04 11:41 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |