A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

G.A. Fumes Poison Neighbors...No Surprise



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12  
Old November 21st 09, 04:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Orval Fairbairn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 530
Default G.A. Fumes Poison Neighbors...No Surprise

In article ,
Jim Logajan wrote:

JG wrote:
"UCLA scientists have found that people who live and work near Santa
Monica Airport are exposed to high levels of air pollution -- a
significant health concern that has been largely associated with major
commercial airports such as LAX.


The study appears to be online here (not just the abstract):

http://pubs.acs.org/stoken/presspac/...75f?cookieSet=
1

According to it (section 3.3.2) it appears a heavy-duty diesel truck and
a jet taking off yield nearly identical particle concentrations. It would
seem that the neighbors are in the same situation as if they had moved near
a commercial site that had large trucks coming and going and the neigbors
got together to shut down the commercial site.

For comparison, I did a quick search for comparable studies on ultrafine
particle emissions near major roads. I only picked out just one that seemed
comparable (also LA area):

http://sunscreamer.com/publiccomment...%29%20405Fwy.p
df

Figure 4(c) (90 m downwind) and 4(f) (300 m upwind) seem to indicate that an
exposure factor about 17 times greater than background (comparing the peaks
in fig 4(c) and 4(f) and dividing: 1.0E5 / 6.0E3) Comparable to the airport
study finding a factor of about 10 for about the same distance from the
source.

As far as I can tell, the numbers seem to indicate that living near a busy
airport is about as dangerous as living near a major highway with respect to
ultrafine particle emissions. It seems that demanding that aircraft takeoffs
be reduced or shut down entirely at an airport would be equivalent to
demanding that the number of vehicles on a major highway be reduced or
shut down. The options to neighbors appears to be roughly the same in
both cases.


Did the study include particulate matter from tire dust that occurs
comes from tires rolling down the freeway? That matter would be minimal
from an airport but available in quantity from freeways.

The whole thing sounds to me like cherry-picked data.

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
U.S.A.F. - C.A.P. take note from our Canadian neighbors karen[_2_] Soaring 1 September 28th 09 01:20 AM
Welding and fumes Michael Horowitz Home Built 2 August 19th 09 04:05 PM
pick your poison on tow [email protected] Soaring 8 April 1st 06 07:42 AM
Cape Cod Airport Neighbors Sign On!!! Skylune Piloting 26 December 7th 05 05:07 PM
YF-23 re-emerges for surprise bid noname Military Aviation 8 July 21st 04 12:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.