If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ
"BobR" wrote in message s.com... It is a very simple concept, if you claim a WORLD RECORD which is what Cambell clearly stated in the bio, it should be verifiable by a recognized World Athority. There's another simple concept -- opinions are like anuses, everyone has one and in the case of the RAH Gaggle, they all stink. BTW, when did the NAA or FAI start keeping track of microlight records? Dan wrote: Juan Jimenez wrote: "Dan" wrote in message ... Juan Jimenez wrote: "DABEAR" wrote in message oups.com... snipped FWIW, I don't recall Zoom claiming his 'record' was recognized by anyone. Then it's not a record. Sorry, but that's wrong too. A record is a record if you document it to a sufficient level that it can be verified. Whether or not the person chooses to submit it to the FAI does not change that. An "FAI Record" is only such if it is recognized by the FAI. Two different statements. The problem is cambell provides no disinterested documentation. Sorry, but no. Wrong answer. Have you asked him? Never mind, I already know the answer. The simple, incontrovertible fact is that you have no evidence to reach such a conclusion. No one here does. He hasn't yet provided proof in any publication. If you have such proof provide it. As for asking him, why should I? It's up to him to provide proof especially since he's on record about lying about other accomplishments. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ
"Dan" wrote in message ... Juan Jimenez wrote: "Dan" wrote in message ... Juan Jimenez wrote: "Dan" wrote in message ... Juan Jimenez wrote: http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1 Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no record. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the article? chuckle Get over it. Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of said barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the aircraft and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original seal and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt? Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given no one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source. All bark, no bite. My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a controlling authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand. I don't think he really gives a damn what anyone else here thinks of what he did or didn't do, Dan. If you haven't figured that out yet, here's your chance. Juan As a publisher he should care what people think of him. Perhaps he doesn't care what YOU think. On the other hand you criticize people who question his claims without providing any proof of your own. What makes you think I care what you think about what I post here, Dan? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ
"DABEAR" wrote in message ups.com... Juan Jimenez wrote: Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given no one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source. All bark, no bite. The last time somebody went to the source, the source was last seen running "DOWN" the "UP" elevator, cowardly piece of filth that he is. Oh, please, take your prepubescent postings somewhere else. Last time I saw someone go up to "the source" there were plenty of people around Campbell and most of them have more aviation experience in their pinkies than you can muster in your lifetime, Mark. I happened to be with him at the XPrize Cup. Where were you? Toilet? mercy snip -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ
"DABEAR" wrote in message ups.com... Juan Jimenez wrote: Sorry, but that's wrong too. A record is a record if you document it to a sufficient level that it can be verified. Whether or not the person chooses to submit it to the FAI does not change that. An "FAI Record" is only such if it is recognized by the FAI. Two different statements. Nonsense! Your opinion has been noted. mercy snip -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ Record results
"John Ousterhout" wrote in message news:3VLgh.1098499$084.800306@attbi_s22... Montblack wrote: Page not found The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable. HTTP 404 - File not found Dear Mr. Black Thank you for your valuable feedback. Your comments have been noted and the deficiencies identified have been corrected. YOU NICKING FUTPICKER! My wife the Grammar Nazi supplies all the nicking futpicking that I can stand, thank you very much. Sincerely yours J. Ousterhout, Webmonster - http://www.ousterhout.net rah/14, EAA, AOPA, OPA, FAA, FFA, EIEIO Why does this idiotic little tantrum not surprise me? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ Record results
"DABEAR" wrote in message oups.com... snipped Some things not included in the FAI's categories: mercy snipped Any aviation-related records on issues such as: - size - weight - capacity - feats of strength associated with or performed with aircraft - repetition records associated with aircraft - anything not covered by FAI categories but clearly aviation-related Next! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message ... Juan Jimenez wrote: "Dan" wrote in message ... Juan Jimenez wrote: "DABEAR" wrote in message oups.com... snipped FWIW, I don't recall Zoom claiming his 'record' was recognized by anyone. Then it's not a record. Sorry, but that's wrong too. A record is a record if you document it to a sufficient level that it can be verified. Whether or not the person chooses to submit it to the FAI does not change that. An "FAI Record" is only such if it is recognized by the FAI. Two different statements. The problem is cambell provides no disinterested documentation. Sorry, but no. Wrong answer. Have you asked him? Never mind, I already know the answer. The simple, incontrovertible fact is that you have no evidence to reach such a conclusion. No one here does. He hasn't yet provided proof in any publication. As I said here, no one here appears to have the balls to simply go up to him and ask him. Pathetic. No one should have to. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"BobR" wrote in message s.com... It is a very simple concept, if you claim a WORLD RECORD which is what Cambell clearly stated in the bio, it should be verifiable by a recognized World Athority. There's another simple concept -- opinions are like anuses, everyone has one and in the case of the RAH Gaggle, they all stink. Yours included. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message ... Juan Jimenez wrote: "Dan" wrote in message ... Juan Jimenez wrote: "Dan" wrote in message ... Juan Jimenez wrote: http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1 Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no record. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the article? chuckle Get over it. Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of said barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the aircraft and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original seal and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt? Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given no one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source. All bark, no bite. My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a controlling authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand. I don't think he really gives a damn what anyone else here thinks of what he did or didn't do, Dan. If you haven't figured that out yet, here's your chance. Juan As a publisher he should care what people think of him. Perhaps he doesn't care what YOU think. On the other hand you criticize people who question his claims without providing any proof of your own. What makes you think I care what you think about what I post here, Dan? You keep piping up. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ
Juan Jimenez wrote:
snip As I said here, no one here appears to have the balls to simply go up to him and ask him. Pathetic. Why bother? He lied about the record once, he will only do it again. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Zoom | Cy Galley | Home Built | 213 | May 17th 05 01:19 AM |
Zoom sues...again | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 9 | April 28th 05 01:11 PM |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Zoom fables on ANN ZZZZZZZZZZZZ | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 49 | July 22nd 04 06:06 PM |
ANN is biased ZZZJJJ | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 30 | January 4th 04 01:58 PM |