A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pusher props for WW I fighters



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 10th 04, 02:51 PM
John Bailey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pusher props for WW I fighters

Watching the Ultralight tow planes at the Finger Lakes Aerosport Park
(http://www.fingerlakesaerosportpark.com/)
Labor Day Week fly-in, it occurred to me that WWI fighters could have
solved their gun aim/synchronization problems easily by adopting a
pusher prop configuration. Wondering why this solution was never
adopted, I realized:
1) The engine in front provides a modicum of protection for the pilot.
But surely, an engine behind would avoid the more dangerous tail
attack.
2) Cooling of the engine might be more difficult--but now the castor
oil is blown away from the pilot, not into his face.
3) Strength of the fuselage, arranged for a pushed configuration might
be less certain. OTOH, several of the original jennys were pushers.

Picture of a pusher prop ultralight:
http://www.fingerlakesaerosportpark....Rhet-plane.jpg

Any thoughts about this tradeoff?

John Bailey
http://home.rochester.rr.com/jbxroads/mailto.html
  #2  
Old September 10th 04, 02:57 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Bailey" wrote in message
...
Watching the Ultralight tow planes at the Finger Lakes Aerosport Park
(http://www.fingerlakesaerosportpark.com/)
Labor Day Week fly-in, it occurred to me that WWI fighters could have
solved their gun aim/synchronization problems easily by adopting a
pusher prop configuration. Wondering why this solution was never
adopted, I realized:


But it WAS adopted


1) The engine in front provides a modicum of protection for the pilot.
But surely, an engine behind would avoid the more dangerous tail
attack.


Trouble is in a crash the pilot was sandwiched between
the engine and the ground

2) Cooling of the engine might be more difficult--but now the castor
oil is blown away from the pilot, not into his face.
3) Strength of the fuselage, arranged for a pushed configuration might
be less certain. OTOH, several of the original jennys were pushers.


The pusher prop meant you coudnt have an air gunner firing to the rear


Picture of a pusher prop ultralight:
http://www.fingerlakesaerosportpark....Rhet-plane.jpg


Picture of a Vickers Gunbus

http://www.rcaf.com/1914_1938_format...ghters/gunbus/
http://www.ukskies.co.uk/index.htm?h...5%20Gunbus.htm

Keith




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #3  
Old September 10th 04, 03:47 PM
Tex Houston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Bailey" wrote in message
...
Watching the Ultralight tow planes at the Finger Lakes Aerosport Park
(http://www.fingerlakesaerosportpark.com/)
Labor Day Week fly-in, it occurred to me that WWI fighters could have
solved their gun aim/synchronization problems easily by adopting a
pusher prop configuration.


In addition to the Vickers Gunbus already mentioned are the Airco DH.1 and
DH.2 and the Royal Aircraft Factory F.E.2 but I'm sure there were more.

Tex



  #4  
Old September 11th 04, 10:18 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


There's a darling Farman at the Owl's Head Museum in Maine. It was a
pusher, but it still didn't have fixed guns. Instead the gunner sat in
front of the pilot; if the plane were attacked from behind, he stood
up and fired over the pilot's head.

Furthermore, he didn't wear (didn't have!) a seat belt.

There's a great book by an American cowboy who became a Canadian truck
driver, then a Farman gunner for the RFC, and finally a pilot. (Well,
that wasn't the end of the story: he returned to the U.S. and joined
the Air Service, but that was a disappointment for him, and also for
the reader.) www.warbirdforum.com/horses.htm


all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
Expedition sailboat charters www.expeditionsail.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
B-17s Debut, RAF Wellingtons Bomb & Fighters Sweep at Zeno's Video Drive-In zeno Instrument Flight Rules 0 October 30th 04 06:20 PM
B-17s Debut, RAF Wellingtons Bomb & Fighters Sweep at Zeno's Video Drive-In zeno Home Built 0 October 30th 04 06:19 PM
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? Matthew G. Saroff Military Aviation 111 May 4th 04 05:34 PM
Props and Wing Warping... was soaring vs. flaping Wright1902Glider Home Built 0 September 29th 03 03:40 PM
US (Brit/Japanese/German/USSR) Use of Gun Cameras in Fighters?? ArtKramr Military Aviation 3 July 17th 03 06:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.