A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Homebuilt Engine, Part 1



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 20th 08, 02:32 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 472
Default The Homebuilt Engine, Part 1

If you've read the latest 'Sport Aviation' you were no doubt impressed
by the 'New Engines for Experimental Aircraft' (page 35). The
infomercial shows a few engines with prices starting at about ten
grand, topping out at more than $50k, chump change for all those folks
dedicated to revitalizing grass-roots aviation in America.

For a whiff of reality, go over to GM's industrial engine page and
take a look at their V2400. In fact, don't just take a look at it,
figure out some way to get your hands on one.

Now turn it upside down and call me on the phone.

Once we have the thing running inverted we'll figure out how to
fabricate a carbon-fiber sump and valve cover. Carbon-fiber because
the alternative is cast aluminum and odds are, we don't have the
required depth of machining talent to produce a finished product from
a raw casting (although the guys did exactly that for the O-290-G back
in John Thorpe's day). With carbon-fiber we can fabricate the things
locally.

What do we get for our trouble? A 75hp water-cooled engine that
produces those 75 horses at an rpm suitable for twirling a prop.

What do we do with it? We put it in a Pietenpol. Or any other low-
tech, two-seater.

(Why invert it? Because that puts the thrust-line in the proper place
without filling your forward vision with cylinder heads and
radiators.)

Is it expensive? Probably. It's being manufactured in Brazil and the
way our Bail-Out Bucks are depreciating, we are well on our way to
becoming a Third World Nation. But it's an INDUSTRIAL engine, meaning
there's going to be a lot of them available.

Inverting an engine is fairly common in aviation; there's some tricks
to it but no mysteries.

Why the Pietenpol? Well... why NOT? It's a proven design and the
weight of the V2400 is close to that of the Model A. It's a two-
seater, which is almost a necessity if you want to stimulate grass-
roots aviation, and its fabrication calls for only a modest level of
skills. Indeed, if you participate in building a Primary Glider you
will have experienced virtually all of the skills needed to build a
Piet.

Food for thought.

-R.S.Hoover
  #2  
Old September 20th 08, 09:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Copperhead
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 40
Default The Homebuilt Engine, Part 1


Nice post Bob, Your correct these engines aren't cheap but when you
consider a Corvair aircraft engine built for you runs close to 8 grand
and a VW aircraft engine in the 70-80 HP range rund in the 5-6+ grand
range excluding props, hubs, mounts, etc then a new water cooled
engine like this does look pretty good afterall.

Joe

  #3  
Old September 20th 08, 10:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default The Homebuilt Engine, Part 1


"Copperhead" wrote

and a VW aircraft engine in the 70-80 HP range rund in the 5-6+ grand


A 70 HP VW engine does not exist. Not if you want it to run more than 30
hours or so.
--
Jim in NC


  #4  
Old September 20th 08, 10:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Copperhead
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 40
Default The Homebuilt Engine, Part 1

On Sep 20, 4:45*pm, "Morgans" wrote:
"Copperhead" wrote

and a VW aircraft engine in the 70-80 HP range rund in the 5-6+ grand


A 70 HP VW engine does not exist. *Not if you want it to run more than 30
hours or so.
--
Jim in NC


I know that Jim, but if you read all of the wonder add's you'll be
told that you can build or buy a 30, 60, 76, 80, 85, 90, 100+ peak HP
VW engine and do wonderful things with it. Of course no one explains
what to do with all of the heat generated by that much power either.
Me, I'll be happy with a reliable VW stoker aircraft engine build set
up the way Bob writes about. But hey, what do I know?
  #5  
Old September 20th 08, 11:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
cavelamb himself[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 474
Default The Homebuilt Engine, Part 1

Copperhead wrote:
On Sep 20, 4:45 pm, "Morgans" wrote:

"Copperhead" wrote


and a VW aircraft engine in the 70-80 HP range rund in the 5-6+ grand


A 70 HP VW engine does not exist. Not if you want it to run more than 30
hours or so.
--
Jim in NC



I know that Jim, but if you read all of the wonder add's you'll be
told that you can build or buy a 30, 60, 76, 80, 85, 90, 100+ peak HP
VW engine and do wonderful things with it. Of course no one explains
what to do with all of the heat generated by that much power either.
Me, I'll be happy with a reliable VW stoker aircraft engine build set
up the way Bob writes about. But hey, what do I know?



Then you have a 40 horse engine...

--

Richard

(remove the X to email)
  #6  
Old September 20th 08, 11:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 472
Default The Homebuilt Engine, Part 1

On Sep 20, 2:59*pm, Copperhead wrote:
On Sep 20, 4:45*pm, "Morgans" wrote:

"Copperhead" wrote


and a VW aircraft engine in the 70-80 HP range rund in the 5-6+ grand


A 70 HP VW engine does not exist. *Not if you want it to run more than 30
hours or so.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Harbor Freight is offering a Leak-Down Tester for $30 ( Item
#94190-3RBH, on page 7 in catalog 768-D)

If you operate your engine with a SUSTAINED output level equal to
70hp, the odds are it would fail to pass your leak-down test at 25
hours. What you chose to do with it at that point is up to you but a
surprising percentage of flying VW owners simply keep on flying the
thing... until they suffer a catastrophic valve failure, which can
cost them a new engine.

If your goal is to always operate your engine at high levels of output
the wiser course is to have FOUR heads, two installed on the engine
and a freshly overhauled pair on the shelf ready for use. But at high
levels of output don't be surprised if your TBO is 25 hours or less.

The T4 engine does a bit better, thanks to its greater fin area.

For maximum TBO you'll have to operate your engine BELOW its point of
Maximum Sustained Output, which for the Type 1 is between 35 and 45
hp, depending on the local atmosphere. At that level of output you
can expect to see about 200 hours before the exhaust valves fail the
leak-down test. At that point you should pull the heads and do the
wiggle test. If the heads pass the wiggle test (ie, the valve & guide
are still within spec), you may elect to simply lap the exhaust
valves. But when the head fails the wiggle test it's time to replace
the exhaust valves and their guides, a relatively simple task if
you're tooled up for it. (See any of several articles that address
this chore.) Here again, the wiser course (in my opinion) is to
maintain a spare SET of heads. This allows you to simply swap heads,
giving you up to 200 flying hours to overhaul the removed set.

What sets my ass on fire is the guys who say their engine puts out
80hp... and in the next breath tell all the newbies it only burns 3
gallons per hour... without bothering to explain that the first figure
has NOTHING TO DO with the second. (Three gallons per hour is about
36 horsepower.)

-Bob Hoover
  #7  
Old September 21st 08, 01:35 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Copperhead
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 40
Default The Homebuilt Engine, Part 1

On Sep 20, 5:45*pm, " wrote:
On Sep 20, 2:59*pm, Copperhead wrote: On Sep 20, 4:45*pm, "Morgans" wrote:

"Copperhead" wrote


and a VW aircraft engine in the 70-80 HP range rund in the 5-6+ grand


A 70 HP VW engine does not exist. *Not if you want it to run more than 30
hours or so.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------*--

Harbor Freight is offering a Leak-Down Tester for $30 ( Item
#94190-3RBH, on page 7 in catalog 768-D)

If you operate your engine with a SUSTAINED output level equal to
70hp, the odds are it would fail to pass your leak-down test at 25
hours. *What you chose to do with it at that point is up to you but a
surprising percentage of flying VW owners simply keep on flying the
thing... until they suffer a catastrophic valve failure, which can
cost them a new engine.

If your goal is to always operate your engine at high levels of output
the wiser course is to have FOUR heads, two installed on the engine
and a freshly overhauled pair on the shelf ready for use. *But at high
levels of output don't be surprised if your TBO is 25 hours or less.

The T4 engine does a bit better, thanks to its greater fin area.

For maximum TBO you'll have to operate your engine BELOW its point of
Maximum Sustained Output, which for the Type 1 is between 35 and 45
hp, depending on the local atmosphere. *At that level of output you
can expect to see about 200 hours before the exhaust valves fail the
leak-down test. *At that point you should pull the heads and do the
wiggle test. *If the heads pass the wiggle test (ie, the valve & guide
are still within spec), you may elect to simply lap the exhaust
valves. *But when the head fails the wiggle test it's time to replace
the exhaust valves and their guides, a relatively simple task if
you're tooled up for it. *(See any of several articles that address
this chore.) *Here again, the wiser course (in my opinion) is to
maintain a spare SET of heads. *This allows you to simply swap heads,
giving you up to 200 flying hours to overhaul the removed set.

What sets my ass on fire is the guys who say their engine puts out
80hp... and in the next breath tell all the newbies it only burns 3
gallons per hour... without bothering to explain that the first figure
has NOTHING TO DO with the second. *(Three gallons per hour is about
36 horsepower.)

-Bob Hoover


Your my hero Bob, you tell it like it is and don't pull any punches.
Everything I'd researched here and elsewhere written by you and a
select few others has been just what you've written here. I was
throwing in some tongue in cheek humor because I remembered reading
about a commerical VW engine builders product line a while back. He
never replied to my information request as to TBO and cruise HP. Oh
well I guess he didn't think I was a potential buyer. ;-)
  #8  
Old September 21st 08, 01:42 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Flyingmonk[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 109
Default The Homebuilt Engine, Part 1

On Sep 20, 5:45*pm, "Morgans" wrote:
"Copperhead" wrote

and a VW aircraft engine in the 70-80 HP range rund in the 5-6+ grand


A 70 HP VW engine does not exist. *Not if you want it to run more than 30
hours or so.
--
Jim in NC


Hey Teach! Hope all is well with you and your family. Haven't
checked in here in years. I have some questions I think you can
answer. Is your email here OK? If not, please email me one that
works.

Thanks,
Monk
  #9  
Old September 21st 08, 03:51 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default The Homebuilt Engine, Part 1


"Flyingmonk" wrote

Hey Teach! Hope all is well with you and your family. Haven't
checked in here in years. I have some questions I think you can
answer. Is your email here OK? If not, please email me one that
works.

Yep, it works if you toss out the big letter trash before you send it. g

Good to see you stop by. Things have changed, but yet they are the same.
;-)
--
Jim in NC


  #10  
Old October 22nd 08, 01:44 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Flyingmonk[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 109
Default The Homebuilt Engine, Part 1

On Sep 21, 10:51*am, "Morgans" wrote:
"Flyingmonk" wrote

Hey Teach! *Hope all is well with you and your family. *Haven't
checked in here in years. *I have some questions I think you can
answer. *Is your email here OK? *If not, please email me one that
works.

Yep, it works if you toss out the big letter trash before you send it. g

Good to see you stop by. *Things have changed, but yet they are the same.
;-)
--
Jim in NC


I already got my answers from another friend Jim. Thanks just the
same though.

Monk
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[09/12] - P-38 starboard engine detail.JPG (1/1) Part 3 Waldo.Pepper[_2_] Aviation Photos 2 September 12th 08 04:46 PM
Saturn V F-1 Engine Testing at F-1 Engine Test Stand 6866986.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 1 April 11th 07 04:48 PM
F-1 Engine for the Saturn V S-IC (first) stage depicts the complexity of the engine 6413912.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 0 April 9th 07 01:38 PM
New Engine on New homebuilt David Koehler Home Built 19 August 14th 05 09:30 PM
wanted: flying homebuilt w/auto engine AINut Home Built 0 January 19th 05 03:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.