A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Grumman AA5 series....facts versus fiction question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old November 11th 09, 05:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
pgonzalez52
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Grumman AA5 series....facts versus fiction question

Hi folks,

I was in the process of purchasing an AA-5A cheetah this week and
spoke with the owner about it. Pictures looked good and the specs were
reasonable for the price. Then I inquire about damage and use. NDH,
great. But then came the bombshell. I asked and he said that he sees
around 112-115 KTAS in cruise at a 23-2400ish power settings. My jaw
dropped to the floor. I asked if he had a Traveler instead of a
cheetah, he assured me a cheetah is what he has. Something is not
adding up. He was candid enough and asserted he could see me getting
120KTAS if you fly the thing wide open and he sure as heck has never
seen the book number of 127.

My question is this. I understand there is usually a difference
between stated book numbers and real numbers, but he confidently (I
appreciated his sincerity) asserted he would barely make 120KTAS with
the thing wide open, which for the purposes of this discussion was
validated by his GPS groundspeed with nominally no-wind. That is a 7-8
KTS difference from the book, more along the lines of what I would
expect to see out of a traveler, which killed off the deal, and
formally has me even reconsidering the Grumman line.

So what's the scoop from those in the know? Are Grumman book numbers
just outright bunk? Because I know I can get 115KTAS out of a 150HP
172, been there done that. Usually a 150HP 172 will stabilize in the
112KTS range, I can take than number to the bank. That is within 3
KTAS of the book, not bad for 30 yo spam cans. But when the cheetah
book advertises 127 and you're struggling to keep 120 something is not
right.

ANybody have any experiences with the cheetah. I was looking for a
125KTAS/150HP aircraft, which is the only airspeed/engine combination
that makes it worthwhile upgrading from the capital and operating cost
of my runout 95KTAS/100HP flaking paint Cessna 150. If I wanted a
115KTAS I could go with a 150HP 172 and have more wide service support
for the same money, yet it's not worth spending 2.5x the money to get
an additional 15kts. I was considering the Traveler line, but if the
cheetah numbers are so skewed, that means the traveler is really a
105KTAS aircraft, meh..

Thanks for the feedback
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale: IN THE COCKPIT VHS VIDEO SERIES - 6 Tape Series [email protected] Aviation Marketplace 0 November 2nd 06 04:12 PM
Ancient Service Bulletin on Converting Continental A-Series and C-Series Engines to Higher Horsepower: 65 to 75HP, Etc. jls Home Built 0 February 21st 05 04:36 PM
"zero" versus "oscar" versus "sierra" Ron Garret Piloting 30 December 20th 04 08:49 AM
Lancaster book series question. Richard Brooks Military Aviation 2 August 26th 04 06:39 AM
Armour Series Collectors - question for you please... Tex Houston Military Aviation 0 August 24th 03 03:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.