A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Multiengine Rating



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 14th 07, 06:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Multiengine Rating

Hi,

i'm interested in the multiengine rating (land), VFR-add-on to my
PP-ASEL.
Any comments about the best training aircraft for these purpose ?
(PA34 Seneca, Beech Duchess, PA44 Seminole, Diamond DA42, ..)

There are big differences concerning the rating requirements.
Some flight schools offer a multi training of 6 hours, other 25 hours
for the rating.

Why it is so ?

Mike

  #3  
Old January 14th 07, 07:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Multiengine Rating


The hours i mentioned are for the multiengine rating course ... there
are big differences from one school to another ...from 6 to 25 hours
(!!) for the rating.



Are you just going for the rating or do you want to rent/buy a twin.
The insurance time in type required to rent/buy is usually more than
the time it requires to get the rating. If you have the option to
rent/buy one just make sure you get your rating in the same model. For
all practical purposes twins are as if they have a type rating (from
the insurance check out requirements).

-Robert


  #5  
Old January 14th 07, 07:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Gardner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 315
Default Multiengine Rating

I expect to get flamed for saying this, but the Duchess and Seminoles are
just trainers, and the Seneca is a real airplane. I have flown a Seminole
(with four onboard) in the tops of a stratus layer, unable to climb into the
clear. From what I read, the DA42 is quite an airplane, but I have no idea
what its cost is compared to others. It, too, is a real airplane as opposed
to a trainer.

Bob Gardner

wrote in message
oups.com...
Hi,

i'm interested in the multiengine rating (land), VFR-add-on to my
PP-ASEL.
Any comments about the best training aircraft for these purpose ?
(PA34 Seneca, Beech Duchess, PA44 Seminole, Diamond DA42, ..)

There are big differences concerning the rating requirements.
Some flight schools offer a multi training of 6 hours, other 25 hours
for the rating.

Why it is so ?

Mike



  #6  
Old January 14th 07, 09:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Multiengine Rating

The Duchess is just a 4 place airplane, but its
single-engine performance is such that it can legally be
flown under Part 135 IFR rules, the Seminole performance is
such that it can't maintain the MEA on one engine on many
routes.

If I was buying a piston twin, I'd want a BE59TC.



"Bob Gardner" wrote in message
. ..
|I expect to get flamed for saying this, but the Duchess and
Seminoles are
| just trainers, and the Seneca is a real airplane. I have
flown a Seminole
| (with four onboard) in the tops of a stratus layer, unable
to climb into the
| clear. From what I read, the DA42 is quite an airplane,
but I have no idea
| what its cost is compared to others. It, too, is a real
airplane as opposed
| to a trainer.
|
| Bob Gardner
|
| wrote in message
|
oups.com...
| Hi,
|
| i'm interested in the multiengine rating (land),
VFR-add-on to my
| PP-ASEL.
| Any comments about the best training aircraft for these
purpose ?
| (PA34 Seneca, Beech Duchess, PA44 Seminole, Diamond
DA42, ..)
|
| There are big differences concerning the rating
requirements.
| Some flight schools offer a multi training of 6 hours,
other 25 hours
| for the rating.
|
| Why it is so ?
|
| Mike
|
|
|


  #7  
Old January 14th 07, 11:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
karl gruber[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 396
Default Multiengine Rating

I'd love to own a 59 Chevy convertible, but I'd rather own a BE58TC!

Karl


"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
...
The Duchess is just a 4 place airplane, but its
single-engine performance is such that it can legally be
flown under Part 135 IFR rules, the Seminole performance is
such that it can't maintain the MEA on one engine on many
routes.

If I was buying a piston twin, I'd want a BE59TC.



"Bob Gardner" wrote in message
. ..
|I expect to get flamed for saying this, but the Duchess and
Seminoles are
| just trainers, and the Seneca is a real airplane. I have
flown a Seminole
| (with four onboard) in the tops of a stratus layer, unable
to climb into the
| clear. From what I read, the DA42 is quite an airplane,
but I have no idea
| what its cost is compared to others. It, too, is a real
airplane as opposed
| to a trainer.
|
| Bob Gardner
|
| wrote in message
|
oups.com...
| Hi,
|
| i'm interested in the multiengine rating (land),
VFR-add-on to my
| PP-ASEL.
| Any comments about the best training aircraft for these
purpose ?
| (PA34 Seneca, Beech Duchess, PA44 Seminole, Diamond
DA42, ..)
|
| There are big differences concerning the rating
requirements.
| Some flight schools offer a multi training of 6 hours,
other 25 hours
| for the rating.
|
| Why it is so ?
|
| Mike
|
|
|




  #8  
Old January 15th 07, 02:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 291
Default Multiengine Rating

karl gruber wrote

I'd love to own a 59 Chevy convertible, but I'd rather own a BE58TC!


My very first automobile was a brand new '59 Chevy convertible, all
white with a red interior. I was a Naval Aviation Cadet flying S-2
Trackers at NAS Kingsville, TX.

Bob Moore

  #9  
Old January 15th 07, 02:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Multiengine Rating

For those who do not know, the BE58TC is a Beech Baron with
the wings and engines of a 58P but the fuselage of the
straight 58. It has the 6200 pound gross weight and weights
400 pounds less than the 58P. So it carries 400 pounds more
payload and performs very well in the 10-12,000 foot range
without demanding the pilot be on oxygen.

But I'd really like a Duchess on floats with 200-220 hp
engines.



"karl gruber" wrote in message
...
| I'd love to own a 59 Chevy convertible, but I'd rather own
a BE58TC!
|
| Karl
|
|
| "Jim Macklin" wrote
in message
| ...
| The Duchess is just a 4 place airplane, but its
| single-engine performance is such that it can legally be
| flown under Part 135 IFR rules, the Seminole performance
is
| such that it can't maintain the MEA on one engine on
many
| routes.
|
| If I was buying a piston twin, I'd want a BE59TC.
|
|
|
| "Bob Gardner" wrote in message
| . ..
| |I expect to get flamed for saying this, but the Duchess
and
| Seminoles are
| | just trainers, and the Seneca is a real airplane. I
have
| flown a Seminole
| | (with four onboard) in the tops of a stratus layer,
unable
| to climb into the
| | clear. From what I read, the DA42 is quite an
airplane,
| but I have no idea
| | what its cost is compared to others. It, too, is a
real
| airplane as opposed
| | to a trainer.
| |
| | Bob Gardner
| |
| | wrote in message
| |
|
oups.com...
| | Hi,
| |
| | i'm interested in the multiengine rating (land),
| VFR-add-on to my
| | PP-ASEL.
| | Any comments about the best training aircraft for
these
| purpose ?
| | (PA34 Seneca, Beech Duchess, PA44 Seminole, Diamond
| DA42, ..)
| |
| | There are big differences concerning the rating
| requirements.
| | Some flight schools offer a multi training of 6
hours,
| other 25 hours
| | for the rating.
| |
| | Why it is so ?
| |
| | Mike
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|


  #10  
Old January 15th 07, 03:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Kingfish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 470
Default Multiengine Rating


Jim Macklin wrote:
For those who do not know, the BE58TC is a Beech Baron with
the wings and engines of a 58P but the fuselage of the
straight 58. It has the 6200 pound gross weight and weights
400 pounds less than the 58P. So it carries 400 pounds more
payload and performs very well in the 10-12,000 foot range
without demanding the pilot be on oxygen.

But I'd really like a Duchess on floats with 200-220 hp
engines.


Duchess? Floats? cocks head Uuuhhhhh???

IIRC the real speedster of the Baron family was the BE56TC with the
380hp Lycs... although I'm not sure if the 58P might have been a few
ka-nots faster at altitude though.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Commercial 250nm VFR flight - all 3 landings on the same day? Jim Macklin Piloting 39 December 20th 06 12:11 PM
Aw Rating merger and Today's ASW Charlie Wolf Naval Aviation 5 May 12th 05 10:34 PM
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) Alan Pendley Instrument Flight Rules 24 December 16th 04 02:16 PM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
Enlisted pilots John Randolph Naval Aviation 41 July 21st 03 02:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.