If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mild Aerobatics
During primary training, many moons ago, I was growing frustrated with the
sedate nature of our flying, so I asked my flight instructor (Bob -- a guy with 20K hours in every known flying machine) when we were going to get to the "fun stuff"? He didn't know what I was talking about, so I told him I wanted to see what these things could actually *do*... At which point he smiled that crooked smile of his, and proceeded to do a wing-over with a recovery out the bottom, going the opposite direction! I was whooping and hollering for more, but he just went back to our lesson for the day.... Nowadays, Mary and I are very cautious in our Pathfinder, rarely exceeding 45 degree banks, and never pulling more than mild G turns. Mary hates steep banks (except in a Super Decathlon -- then all bets are off!), and the most rambunctious thing we ever do are "Up-Downs" (as the kids call them), which is a firm pull up with a steady push-over at the top that induces negative Gs in the back seat. Just curious -- what do you guys do with your spam cans? I've seen video from inside a Cessna that shows a guy doing some pretty radical maneuvers, but in real life what's the most you push your aircraft? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
My airplanes say that "no aerobatic manuevers, including spins, are
approved" so I don't do any aerobatic maneuvers or spins. Mike MU-2 "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news_JKe.239722$x96.59507@attbi_s72... During primary training, many moons ago, I was growing frustrated with the sedate nature of our flying, so I asked my flight instructor (Bob -- a guy with 20K hours in every known flying machine) when we were going to get to the "fun stuff"? He didn't know what I was talking about, so I told him I wanted to see what these things could actually *do*... At which point he smiled that crooked smile of his, and proceeded to do a wing-over with a recovery out the bottom, going the opposite direction! I was whooping and hollering for more, but he just went back to our lesson for the day.... Nowadays, Mary and I are very cautious in our Pathfinder, rarely exceeding 45 degree banks, and never pulling more than mild G turns. Mary hates steep banks (except in a Super Decathlon -- then all bets are off!), and the most rambunctious thing we ever do are "Up-Downs" (as the kids call them), which is a firm pull up with a steady push-over at the top that induces negative Gs in the back seat. Just curious -- what do you guys do with your spam cans? I've seen video from inside a Cessna that shows a guy doing some pretty radical maneuvers, but in real life what's the most you push your aircraft? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Mike
Did you mean to say intentionally? Big John `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` ``````````````````` On 11 Aug 2005 15:21:35 GMT, "Mike Rapoport" wrote: My airplanes say that "no aerobatic manuevers, including spins, are approved" so I don't do any aerobatic maneuvers or spins. Mike MU-2 "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news_JKe.239722$x96.59507@attbi_s72... During primary training, many moons ago, I was growing frustrated with the sedate nature of our flying, so I asked my flight instructor (Bob -- a guy with 20K hours in every known flying machine) when we were going to get to the "fun stuff"? He didn't know what I was talking about, so I told him I wanted to see what these things could actually *do*... At which point he smiled that crooked smile of his, and proceeded to do a wing-over with a recovery out the bottom, going the opposite direction! I was whooping and hollering for more, but he just went back to our lesson for the day.... Nowadays, Mary and I are very cautious in our Pathfinder, rarely exceeding 45 degree banks, and never pulling more than mild G turns. Mary hates steep banks (except in a Super Decathlon -- then all bets are off!), and the most rambunctious thing we ever do are "Up-Downs" (as the kids call them), which is a firm pull up with a steady push-over at the top that induces negative Gs in the back seat. Just curious -- what do you guys do with your spam cans? I've seen video from inside a Cessna that shows a guy doing some pretty radical maneuvers, but in real life what's the most you push your aircraft? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Steep turns here and there, and definitely the "tummy hills", which is
what "my" kids call them... ;-) I'd like to break away and get the aerobatic endorsement at some point. If for nothing else, to really know how to recover from some "truly" unusual attitudes! Best Regards, Todd |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Jay;
I realize that you are offering this question in the context of a "normal" flight situation for the average safe pilot flying an average GA light airplane safely, and considering that, I would say the following. There are pilots out here who will "push" their normal/utility category GA airplanes and those who won't. The smart ones don't "push" their airplanes at all. The reason for this is that there are two factors involved. You have a POH that offers you figures to follow that define your flight envelope, then you have the reality involved with an aging airplane. Considering both factors, it's simply smart flying to keep the "excursions" from normal flight to an absolute minimum. This is not to say that the airplane will fall apart on you if you do a little "not straight and level" flying with it, but it does say that doing this in aging airplanes can increase that aging process somewhat. My advice as an aerobatic instructor to pilots flying light GA airplanes in the normal category is simply to use their heads and don't stray too far into "working" the airplane. I always use a favorite analogy of mine when answering on this issue when asked. G........any g...on an airplane is cumulative. It can add up on you. If someone gently poked their finger into your arm it wouldn't hurt very much the first time they did it; but if they poked that finger into your arm at exactly the same spot a hundred times in a row, that last time could hurt a bunch :-))) Bottom line for GA pilots wanting to "play" a bit..........fly the book....and as the airplane ages.........ease off the airplane even a bit more. Go rent the Decathlon and have some fun!!!! Dudley "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news_JKe.239722$x96.59507@attbi_s72... During primary training, many moons ago, I was growing frustrated with the sedate nature of our flying, so I asked my flight instructor (Bob -- a guy with 20K hours in every known flying machine) when we were going to get to the "fun stuff"? He didn't know what I was talking about, so I told him I wanted to see what these things could actually *do*... At which point he smiled that crooked smile of his, and proceeded to do a wing-over with a recovery out the bottom, going the opposite direction! I was whooping and hollering for more, but he just went back to our lesson for the day.... Nowadays, Mary and I are very cautious in our Pathfinder, rarely exceeding 45 degree banks, and never pulling more than mild G turns. Mary hates steep banks (except in a Super Decathlon -- then all bets are off!), and the most rambunctious thing we ever do are "Up-Downs" (as the kids call them), which is a firm pull up with a steady push-over at the top that induces negative Gs in the back seat. Just curious -- what do you guys do with your spam cans? I've seen video from inside a Cessna that shows a guy doing some pretty radical maneuvers, but in real life what's the most you push your aircraft? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Considering both factors, it's simply smart flying to keep the
"excursions" from normal flight to an absolute minimum. This is not to say that the airplane will fall apart on you if you do a little "not straight and level" flying with it, but it does say that doing this in aging airplanes can increase that aging process somewhat. Good point. This is something that concerns me, and I suspect I'm not alone. Here's one recent experience that made me wonder about our aging airframe. While departing Iowa City last month, another pilot reported his position as being 3 miles Southeast of the field, maneuvering. Since we were departing to the Northeast, we determined that he would not be a factor. Not! As we were climbing out, our direction-challenged fellow pilot became visible in the haze, and I saw that he was on an intercept course -- with us as the target. For the first time in our flying lives (10 years, 1500+ hours), Mary and I experienced an in-flight disagreement over what to do. She, in the left seat, saw no reason for evasive maneuvers, determining that the plane would pass over us with room to spare. I, in the right seat, saw the plane growing larger in my starboard-side window by the second. After a few more seconds of debate, I ended the discussion by pushing my yoke firmly forward, inducing negative G and allowing us to pass harmlessly beneath the traffic. We cleared the plane with room to spare. Would we have hit him without my action? Probably not. Nevertheless, we decided (after much debate) that I had acted correctly, given the circumstances, since it fit into our pre-arranged agreement that the right seater doesn't ever touch the controls unless they feel that their inaction would put the plane at risk. However, I did (and still) wonder about putting that much negative-G on our 34 year old airframe. Without a G meter it's impossible to know how much G was induced, but I'd say it was 50% more than I've ever done before. (The only negative G maneuver I ever do is the push-over at the top of a steep pull-up, known by my kids as an "Up-Down".) Was 50% more too much? We were climbing out, so our airspeed was relatively low -- probably around 80 knots. The entire maneuver lasted less than 5 seconds, and nothing floated in the cockpit -- but in an old airplane, how much is too much? As another reference point (and a crude way of measuring the negative Gs), I routinely read about guys doing the "up-down" maneuver to the point where their engine sputters due to fuel starvation. I've *never* done the maneuver to that degree, even in this situation (although that may be due to the short duration of the maneuver) -- so I'm assuming that I didn't push the airframe beyond structural limits. Since that flight I've carefully inspected the empennage, and there is obviously no visible stress or strain, or I wouldn't be flying it -- but how can you really know without extensive metallurgic testing? If you've ever looked at the stabilator attachment on a Cherokee you will marvel at the simplicity and apparent fragility of the design, so inducing excessive negative-G is something we never, ever do. However, even though there is (to my knowledge) no record of a stabilator departing the airframe of a Cherokee, you've got to wonder how many days (weeks? months?) a sudden push-over takes off the life of an airframe? Thanks for the post, Dudley. As always, you have introduced a thought-provoking angle to the discussion. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Try this in anticipation of a future conflict. Unless it is a direct
head on conflict, i.e. directly in front and not moving on the windscreen, try turning into it. This is much harder to describe than to experience. And it's not natural unless you practice a bit. But if an a/c is *converging* on you and you can put your nose on it before the anticipated collision, you'll miss it, almost no matter what the other a/c does. If you try to turn away from a converging a/c the opposite occurs - a collision becomes more likely. Try it with some hand held models. Try it with some real traffic at a good distance. You'll get the idea. Then when that a/c appears out of no where, you will tend to do a positive G turn rather than a push over or pull up. If it's converging, turn into it. If it's diverging - turn away. Keep it positive. comments? Jay Honeck wrote: ... As we were climbing out, our direction-challenged fellow pilot became visible in the haze, and I saw that he was on an intercept course -- with us as the target. After a few more seconds of debate, I ended the discussion by pushing my yoke firmly forward, inducing negative G and allowing us to pass harmlessly beneath the traffic. We cleared the plane with room to spare. However, I did (and still) wonder about putting that much negative-G on our 34 year old airframe. Without a G meter it's impossible to know how much G was induced, but I'd say it was 50% more than I've ever done before. (The only negative G maneuver I ever do is the push-over at the top of a steep pull-up, known by my kids as an "Up-Down".) Was 50% more too much? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In article 7kLKe.239817$x96.9166@attbi_s72,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: [snip] However, I did (and still) wonder about putting that much negative-G on our 34 year old airframe. Without a G meter it's impossible to know how much G was induced, but I'd say it was 50% more than I've ever done before. I've been told that what people usually think of as negative Gs are actually just a reduction in positive g loading. As you said, without the g meter, you don't know. But if you weren't "hanging" from the seat belts, I would think you didn't see negative g's at all, just something noticably less than the usual 1.0 positive g. Sounds like you have an excuse er reason to go and get some real aerobatic training to see what -1 g really feels like. :-) -- Bob Noel no one likes an educated mule |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
We were climbing out, so our airspeed was relatively low -- probably
around 80 knots. The entire maneuver lasted less than 5 seconds, and nothing floated in the cockpit -- but in an old airplane, how much is too much? If nothing floated you didn't even reach zero g, let alone negative g's. You had a long way to go before risking overstressing anything. Rod |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:7kLKe.239817$x96.9166@attbi_s72... snip After a few more seconds of debate, I ended the discussion by pushing my yoke firmly forward, inducing negative G and allowing us to pass harmlessly beneath the traffic. We cleared the plane with room to spare. snip However, I did (and still) wonder about putting that much negative-G on our 34 year old airframe. Without a G meter it's impossible to know how much G was induced, but I'd say it was 50% more than I've ever done before. (The only negative G maneuver I ever do is the push-over at the top of a steep pull-up, known by my kids as an "Up-Down".) Was 50% more too much? We were climbing out, so our airspeed was relatively low -- probably around 80 knots. The entire maneuver lasted less than 5 seconds, and nothing floated in the cockpit -- but in an old airplane, how much is too much? As another reference point (and a crude way of measuring the negative Gs), I routinely read about guys doing the "up-down" maneuver to the point where their engine sputters due to fuel starvation. I've *never* done the maneuver to that degree, even in this situation (although that may be due to the short duration of the maneuver) -- so I'm assuming that I didn't push the airframe beyond structural limits. Since that flight I've carefully inspected the empennage, and there is obviously no visible stress or strain, or I wouldn't be flying it -- but how can you really know without extensive metallurgic testing? snip Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" Is the engine on the pathfinder carburated? If so, the engine will stumble anywhere near zero g. In addition, since you didn't see anything "flying" inside the cockpit, my guess is that you merely approached zero g, which isn't a problem at all. KB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 05 08:31 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | January 1st 05 08:29 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 04 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | February 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | January 1st 04 07:27 AM |