Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11

"khobar" wrote in news:30NQf.421$PE.346@fed1read05:

"Wake Up!" wrote in message
...
"khobar" wrote in
news:kZBQf.392$PE.376@fed1read05:

"Keith W" wrote in message
...

"Wake UP!" wrote in message
...
Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/Thermite.htm


I've seen and used thermite and thats not it, by the way you are
aware that thermite isnt used to demolish buildings arent you ?

Yes he is, but that's the beauty of his conspiracy - since thermite
isn't used for demolition, no one would suspect it being used. Har
har har de har har.

Paul Nixon





As if that means anything, or has any bearing whatsoever. (I guess to
a reality denier it might.) Can thermite partially evaporate steel?
Yes. Could thermite cause the temperatures that existed in metal at
the WTC? Yes. Can thermite cause metal dripping like in the videos?
Yes. Were those three items present at the WTC? Yes. I love the way
you deniers aren't able to take everything into context, and instead
give silly reasons for each and every piece of information, so you
can hold on to your absurd government conspiracy theory. LOL!!

Can a nuclear reaction partially evaporate steel? Yes. Could a nuclear
reaction cause the temperatures that existed in metal at the WTC? Yes.
Can a nuclear reaction cause metal dripping like in the videos? Yes.
Were these three items present at the WTC? Yes.

Oops...

Paul Nixon





Okay. Where's the evidence supporting that? Let's not forget that
hundreds of people (many professors) read his paper. His supporters are
growing, not shrinking. And based of his evidence at his Sept 22 seminar,
he convinced 60 faculty members that there should be a new investigation.

Wake Up! wrote:

Tank Fixer wrote in
k.net:


In article ,
on Sun, 12 Mar 2006 01:17:53 GMT,
Wake Up! attempted to say .....




As if that means anything, or has any bearing whatsoever. (I guess to
a reality denier it might.) Can thermite partially evaporate steel?
Yes. Could thermite cause the temperatures that existed in metal at
the WTC? Yes. Can thermite cause metal dripping like in the videos?
Yes. Were those three items present at the WTC? Yes.

Really, so you have PROOF of it I guess ?


Of course not. That's why 20 yr experienced Physics Professor Steven
Jones PhD calls his paper a hypothesis.


And it is also why NONE of his peers agree with him.

Jase Vanover wrote:

Occam's Razor. Look it up.


In his mind, "the government did it" is the most logical explanation.

Johnny Bravo wrote:

On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 20:59:45 -0700, "khobar" wrote:


Can a nuclear reaction partially evaporate steel? Yes. Could a nuclear
reaction cause the temperatures that existed in metal at the WTC? Yes. Can a
nuclear reaction cause metal dripping like in the videos? Yes. Were these
three items present at the WTC? Yes.

Oops...

Paul Nixon


The amusing thing about that is that "TRUTH" presented a "paper" from a
"Finnish military expert" who claimed that the WTC was a controlled demolition.
"TRUTH" jumped on it like a drowning man clutches a life preserver. What
"TRUTH" didn't do was see exactly what this "miltiary expert" claimed as the
explosive in other pages on his site; tiny thermonuclear bombs, possibly ignited
by anti-matter.


TRUTH has a habit of NOT reading the "proof" he posts.
Remember the article that indicated the "no plane" incident at the
Pentagon? It was from the "Truth" people, but claimed the "no plane"
stuff was a fraud to make the them look like crazy people, since all
evidence indicates there was a plane. TRUTH then back out saying he was
only trying to present different points of view on the government
conspiracy. Previously he was saying this was one "proof" of his view.

Wake Up! wrote:

and where is the evidence showing he came to the wrong conclusion? And
where is the evidence for your conclusion? Be specific.

There is plenty of evidence, you just choose to ignore anything/anyone
that doesn't agree with you. Remember the pilots that stated an
airliner could be flown by amateurs into the WTC. You ignored their
comments, didn't you?

Didn't you also say you were "finished" a long time ago when you posted
as TRUTH?

Wake Up! wrote:



Okay. Where's the evidence supporting that?

Where is the evidence that it was thermite?
You posted a link to someone who claimed it was nuclear.
Are you going to claim you didn't read that either?
You have a habit of posting links as "proof" and then claiming these are
not your beliefs.


Let's not forget that
hundreds of people (many professors) read his paper. His supporters are
growing, not shrinking. And based of his evidence at his Sept 22 seminar,
he convinced 60 faculty members that there should be a new investigation.

Cite? Prior reviews of the same "evidence" have caused his peers to
regard him as "misinformed". Did new "evidence" come to light?

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 08:25:07 GMT, "Wake Up!" wrote:

"khobar" wrote in news:30NQf.421$PE.346@fed1read05:

"Wake Up!" wrote in message
...
"khobar" wrote in
news:kZBQf.392$PE.376@fed1read05:

"Keith W" wrote in message
...

"Wake UP!" wrote in message
...
Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/Thermite.htm


I've seen and used thermite and thats not it, by the way you are
aware that thermite isnt used to demolish buildings arent you ?

Yes he is, but that's the beauty of his conspiracy - since thermite
isn't used for demolition, no one would suspect it being used. Har
har har de har har.

Paul Nixon





As if that means anything, or has any bearing whatsoever. (I guess to
a reality denier it might.) Can thermite partially evaporate steel?
Yes. Could thermite cause the temperatures that existed in metal at
the WTC? Yes. Can thermite cause metal dripping like in the videos?
Yes. Were those three items present at the WTC? Yes. I love the way
you deniers aren't able to take everything into context, and instead
give silly reasons for each and every piece of information, so you
can hold on to your absurd government conspiracy theory. LOL!!

Can a nuclear reaction partially evaporate steel? Yes. Could a nuclear
reaction cause the temperatures that existed in metal at the WTC? Yes.
Can a nuclear reaction cause metal dripping like in the videos? Yes.
Were these three items present at the WTC? Yes.

Oops...

Paul Nixon





Okay. Where's the evidence supporting that? Let's not forget that
hundreds of people (many professors) read his paper. His supporters are
growing, not shrinking. And based of his evidence at his Sept 22 seminar,
he convinced 60 faculty members that there should be a new investigation.

Faculty qualified to critique his scientific claims from such diverse fields
as psychology, psychiatry, economics, history, literature and politics.

Feel free to give me the name of ONE of the Physicists or Civil Engineers from
BYU that he has convinced.

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 08:18:27 GMT, "Wake Up!" wrote:

And yet he still came to the wrong conclusions, as did you


and where is the evidence showing he came to the wrong conclusion? And
where is the evidence for your conclusion? Be specific.

You are not automatically right in science, requiring others to prove you
wrong; science doesn't work that way. If he can't convince civil engineers that
he is correct, he is the one that failed, not they.

But you can always prop up your delusions with the knowledge that Jones got
his paper published in a book of economic and policital articles about 9/11. I'm
willing to bet that you'll be waiting for a cold day in hell before he gets
published in a peer reviewed journal concerning structural engineering.

"Wake Up!" wrote in message
...
"khobar" wrote in news:kZBQf.392$PE.376@fed1read05:

"Keith W" wrote in message
...

"Wake UP!" wrote in message
...
Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/Thermite.htm


I've seen and used thermite and thats not it, by the way you are
aware that thermite isnt used to demolish buildings arent you ?

Yes he is, but that's the beauty of his conspiracy - since thermite
isn't used for demolition, no one would suspect it being used. Har har
har de har har.

Paul Nixon





As if that means anything, or has any bearing whatsoever. (I guess to a
reality denier it might.) Can thermite partially evaporate steel? Yes.

No, at best it can melt it, most often its used for welding


Could thermite cause the temperatures that existed in metal at the WTC?
Yes.

As can burning office furniture, this was present in huge quantities.

Can thermite cause metal dripping like in the videos? Yes.

No, thermite produces molten iron, the metal in the video was aluminium


Were
those three items present at the WTC? Yes. I love the way you deniers
aren't able to take everything into context, and instead give silly
reasons for each and every piece of information, so you can hold on to
your absurd government conspiracy theory. LOL!!

I am not the person pushing the absurd government conspiracy theory.

Keith

"Wake UP!" wrote in message
...
excerpt from Dr Jones paper:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html


Dramatic footage reveals yellow-to-white hot molten metal dripping from
the
South WTC Tower shortly before its collapse:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...54740145858863
&q=cameraplanet+9%2F11. The yellow color implies a molten-metal
temperature of approximately 1000 oC,

Problem is structural steel has a melting point of around 1400 deg C
so whatever it was it was NOT molten steel.

Keith