If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Stadt" wrote in message .com... December 17, 1903 flight 5 at which time it done did _turn_ itself into a pile of scrap wood. There were only four flights on December 17, 1903. The Flyer received minor damage on the fourth flight. They were discussing repairs prior to a possible fifth flight when a gust of wind picked up the Flyer and rolled it into a ball. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Corky Scott wrote:
He was halfway down the runway and for some reason felt he had to make a decision about whether to takeoff or not. This is the part I don't understand. Why did he have to takeoff or not? Couldn't he have simply shut the engine down? He said that he knew he wouldn't have been able to stop in time without hitting trees, so he elected to take-off instead. -- Jeff 'The Wizard of Draws' Bucchino "Cartoons with a Touch of Magic" http://www.wizardofdraws.com http://www.cartoonclipart.com |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Corky...
Exactly the question we discussed after the show. Did not and do not believe the "explanation" and really believe the builder. Neal |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
In a previous article, (Corky Scott) said:
He was halfway down the runway and for some reason felt he had to make a decision about whether to takeoff or not. This is the part I don't understand. Why did he have to takeoff or not? Couldn't he have simply shut the engine down? There was a very quick discussion on the show that he didn't think he could stop in time to miss crashing into the trees at the end. Given the choice between a sure crash if he stayed on the ground or a likely crash if he lifted up, he elected to take off. Wasn't the Wright B pretty close to the Vin Fizz (which I think was a modified EX)? In which case, it should have been a pretty capable plane. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "The surreality of the universe tends towards a maximum" -- Skud's Law "Never formulate a law or axiom that you're not prepared to live with the consequences of." -- Skud's Meta-Law |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message k.net... "Dave Stadt" wrote in message .com... December 17, 1903 flight 5 at which time it done did _turn_ itself into a pile of scrap wood. There were only four flights on December 17, 1903. The Flyer received minor damage on the fourth flight. They were discussing repairs prior to a possible fifth flight when a gust of wind picked up the Flyer and rolled it into a ball. Exactly. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Icebound wrote: Turning? Was the 1903 Wright Flyer capable of turning??? Yes. No. It was capapble of small amounts of directional control, pretty much limitted to adjusting the straight ahead ground track. It didn't have enough control to make anything that resembles a real turn. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
R/C B-52 Model crash | Greasy Rider | Military Aviation | 14 | September 26th 04 05:16 AM |
Article: America Has Grounded the Wright Brothers | Tom Sixkiller | Owning | 66 | January 3rd 04 05:55 PM |
Sunday's Crash in LI Sound | Marco Leon | Piloting | 0 | November 5th 03 04:34 PM |
Wright Flyer won't fly! | Trent Moorehead | Piloting | 31 | October 18th 03 04:37 PM |
The Wright Stuff and The Wright Experience | John Carrier | Military Aviation | 54 | October 12th 03 04:59 AM |