If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
On 14 Oct 2005 13:37:45 GMT, Ray Hart
wrote: No 15 metre glider should be tricky to fly these days. It simply would not get a Certificate of Airworthiness. Glider manufacturers should be falling over backwards to show us how safe and 'flyable' their products are. This Diana story makes me suspicious. What are the manufacturers trying to hide? You got the point. I'd suggest to ask pilots who saw the Diana 2 at the European gliding competions, especially about the aerotow launches. I still remember when Tilo Holighaus came to my home airfield with the brand-new Discus 2 which had had its maiden flight the week before and whose flight testing had barely begun. He didn't know me at all but immediately let me fly his brand new toy when I asked him...! Bye Andreas |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Hi All,
Detailed photographs of Diana-2. I have limited the size of the photos to 800 pixels, but if someone wants a specific photo, please ask. The description of the photos is on top of the photo (once you open it). http://www.neshe.com/gallery/main.ph...g2_itemId=1620 These also contain your's truly going for his ASK-21 check-ride. Best, Naresh |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
From my perspective...speaking as the owner of a manufacturing company that
sells a product to consumers here in the U.S., I believe the factory rep and Mr. Beres owe more than an apology. They should write a check to cover expenses suffered AT THEIR REQUEST... The conjecture of this group sometimes amazes me. When a manufacturer invites someone to review their product...whether to write about it...or to buy one, they have ethical guidelines that all the rest of us consumers deserve to hear about. In my estimation, the manufacturer has not handled themselves in ANY format consistent with the term ETHICAL. The facts of the situation have been well documented and while there's argument as to specifics, the much larger issue of how a manufacturer handles themself, with regard to its customers is perhaps the single most impressive issue we get to witness and use as the determination of whether to support their product. For a new product to survive in the market, manufacturers need to be very solidly behind their product from every facet of it's intended role. If the Diana2 is REALLY as good and safe and better than anything out there, as it's claimed, then surely a guy with 1200+ accident free flights and one who demonstrated his proficiency to an unbiased instructor...deserves better treatment than this... If I...were Bogumil Beres...I'd simply reach into my own back pocket...and I'd write the man a check....and a letter of apology...and level with everyone here in RAS that they made a bad decision...and that they understand better from the exchange, what WE as the consumer expect...otherwise, he may find his product flushing it's way down the drain and his investment simply....ruined. Personally, I don't think the "world class" level racing pilots out there are enough to build a company on...at some point Mr. Beres will need "normal pilots" to want to purchase his glider, if he expects sales to continue and his company to flourish. Respectfully, Steve. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:33:31 UTC, Steve Hill
wrote: The facts of the situation have been well documented They have? I have seen claims, but nothing I'd call facts. Ian -- |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
On 14 Oct 2005 17:33:31 GMT, Steve Hill
wrote: From my perspective...speaking as the owner of a manufacturing company that sells a product to consumers here in the U.S., I believe the factory rep and Mr. Beres owe more than an apology. They should write a check to cover expenses suffered AT THEIR REQUEST... The conjecture of this group sometimes amazes me. When a manufacturer invites someone to review their product...whether to write about it...or to buy one, they have ethical guidelines that all the rest of us consumers deserve to hear about. In my estimation, the manufacturer has not handled themselves in ANY format consistent with the term ETHICAL. The facts of the situation have been well documented and while there's argument as to specifics, the much larger issue of how a manufacturer handles themself, with regard to its customers is perhaps the single most impressive issue we get to witness and use as the determination of whether to support their product. For a new product to survive in the market, manufacturers need to be very solidly behind their product from every facet of it's intended role. If the Diana2 is REALLY as good and safe and better than anything out there, as it's claimed, then surely a guy with 1200+ accident free flights and one who demonstrated his proficiency to an unbiased instructor...deserves better treatment than this... If I...were Bogumil Beres...I'd simply reach into my own back pocket...and I'd write the man a check....and a letter of apology...and level with everyone here in RAS that they made a bad decision...and that they understand better from the exchange, what WE as the consumer expect...otherwise, he may find his product flushing it's way down the drain and his investment simply....ruined. Personally, I don't think the "world class" level racing pilots out there are enough to build a company on...at some point Mr. Beres will need "normal pilots" to want to purchase his glider, if he expects sales to continue and his company to flourish. Respectfully, Steve. Very well put! |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
FACT: Anything Done. Anything actually true; That which happened.
Ian, we could accept as fact. The factory admits it invited the individual to fly. The factory admits that he met their requirements, prior to him showing up to fly. The factory admitted it took the glider apart before the completion of the individual taking a check ride. The conjecture, is the weather and personal opinion on the factory's part as to whether the individual was competent to fly, which seems basis-less without an unbiased report from the instructor ( check-ride pilot). FACT: The individual suffered financial loss, due to decisions made my the factory for WHATEVER reason they chose, in denying him to fly the ship, AFTER they pre-arranged that opportunity. They should re-imburse the individual for his monetary loss and CLEARLY develop a written procedure for minimum experience required to allow individuals to test fly their glider...however stringent they'd like...but it should be done FIRST! This seems amazingly simple and for you to argue to the contrary seems like you simply don't get the relationship of the manufacturer inviting the individual PRIOR TO the actual event. They knew everything about his background and he complied with all their requests... I don't really care what you choose to lable the issue, for me...in my view as a U.S. Manufacturer...This is absolutely lousy customer service and I concur with previous posters on RAS that I would not even consider purchasing a product from this company based on their customer service...The Factory is being granted the opportunity to resolve the problem and level with the purchasing community and instead they are trying to simply SPIN it all their way...a very foolish and costly mistake in my humble opinion. Respectfully, Steve Hill |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
I still remember when Tilo Holighaus came to my home airfield with the
brand-new Discus 2 which had had its maiden flight the week before and whose flight testing had barely begun. He didn't know me at all but immediately let me fly his brand new toy when I asked him...! Your omitting the fact that Tilo Holighaus runs a factory that sells 100+ gliders a year with an average price of 100,000+ Euros. If you'd crash his Discus 2 at the same time you're describing, its merely an expense for H&S - they could build another 10 in a matter of a month. Where Diana 2 crash would probably put Beres out of building gliders for much longer. I believe he did the right thing, it's just the way he did it that is unacceptable. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
GK wrote:
"I believe he did the right thing, it's just the way he did it that is unacceptable." Nice contradiction. Is this like saying he did the right thing, but he did the wrong thing? Bottom line is he did many wrong things, then tried to double talk around it rather than dealing with it in the proper manner. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:26:39 +0200, @ neshe dot com wrote:
Recently, I was invited by the Diana-2 dealer to be part of the potential customer flight tests in Switzerland. It was a humiliating fiasco. I've written about it on my blog www.neshe.com Please feel free to browse. I think when the sellers became aware of the facts: - the complainant does not own a glider of his own - he talks of a syndicate with 3 or 4 pilots - he does not mention having ever flown in serious competition Surely the typical profile of a Diana 2 customer - already owns competitive racing sailplane - competes, probably at national or international level - has a significant amount of money at his disposal and the motivation to spend it on a very specialized racing glider. Rather the complainant talks about being an engineer, and wanting to write a technical assessment of the glider. The the Diana sellers invited potential customers to fly the glider, not journalists who wanted to do test flights. If they wanted the latter I suspect the complainant would not have been on their shortlist of invited journalists. I can well believe they declined to let him fly - if it was my prototype I would also have said 'No'. I doubt they would offer me a test flight. (Not because I don't have the qualifications but simply because I cannot afford a new Diana). But maybe there was some lack of communications. Possibly due to the multitude of languages and cultures involved. Ian |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Hello All,
Late last night, as I was preparing to go to our club (we are trying to save the gliding activity at our club and not let the club sell the gliders) for a meeting, Mr. Alexander Mueller called me on the phone. He said that, it was a mistake to not let me fly the glider. I do not want to write the entire 45minute conversation since: 1. There will be comments from several on RAS: BUT WE DON'T KNOW DO WE, WHO SAID WHAT AND WHAT WAS SAID etc. 2. It would be unfair of me to say what Mr. Mueller volunteered to say to me. Therefore, I'm forced to leave the details. To save the lamenting any further, here is what I believe is fair if, Mr. Alexander Muller indeed concedes that it was a mistake to not let me fly. I would forget the whole issue and consider a proper apology made by them if either one of the two below is done before the end of October 2005: 1. Mr. Beres or Mr. Mueller, bring the Diana-2 to our Airfield in Parma, Italy, to let me fly it. I'll pay for my tows, they pay their costs of being here, boarding and lodging. The weather here is fine, so I believe that this would be a better recourse. In addition, they will get first hand impression of what Italian hospitality means. 2. Messrs Beres and Mueller, invite me to their factory, AT THEIR expense, and let me fly the glider there. In both the cases, they will allow me to take as many photos and videos as I like. Just to clarify, to a previous post by Ian, No, I'm not a journalist, and they were aware of all the details you so kindly have assumed. Thank you RAS!! Thank you for your support. Best regards, Naresh |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 27th 04 11:49 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |