A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

I hope the FAA has a very fat wallet



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old August 31st 06, 03:59 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Allan9
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 48
Default I hope the FAA has a very fat wallet

It's my understanding that the second controller would be staffing the radar
position and not a tower position. Not defending only one controller on
duty but if two were on duty what their assigned duties would accomplish.
Al

"Ron Lee" wrote in message
...
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:


"FUBAR" wrote in message
...

If the controller staffing had been according to FAA orders(2
controllers), maybe the second controller would have been keeping an eye
on the active field(That's what controllers do) and the other is filling
out some worthless Government paperwork? Controller screams abort on
departure frequency and maybe an aborted and embarrassed takeoff is the
only result.


Maybe. Maybe a second controller wouldn't have noticed anything amiss.
After, two well-qualified, experienced professional pilots didn't catch
the
error.

I read a report that the FAA also questioned the utility of two
controllers in preventing this accident. Of course that could be
driven by legal issues but ultimately the pilots were responsible
(hence pilot in command).

Ron Lee



  #22  
Old August 31st 06, 04:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Allan9
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 48
Default I hope the FAA has a very fat wallet

Two-Controller Policy

The FAA in November 2005 clarified that at least two controllers are
required in towers that use radar to direct planes at and near airports.
Planes that violated separation standards in the Raleigh-Durham area of
North Carolina prompted the FAA staffing change, said Laura Brown, an agency
spokeswoman.

FAA officials learned after the accident that the policy hadn't been
followed in Lexington and ``directed the facility manager to ensure that a
minimum of two controllers are on duty at all times,'' Brown said in an
interview.

Lexington has a radar room in the same tower from which controllers can look
out windows to direct traffic on the ground. FAA workers there can monitor
the radar from the radar room or from the top of the tower. The controller
on the overnight shift the morning of the Comair crash was doing both of
those functions.

Weekend traffic levels at Lexington average about six aircraft per night
between midnight and 6 a.m., Brown said.


"


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hope U.S. soldiers don't get railroaded B2431 Military Aviation 22 June 7th 04 10:17 PM
Still there is always HOPE... X98 Military Aviation 0 March 21st 04 03:48 PM
Military hasn't given up hope on Scott Speicher Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 January 11th 04 11:51 PM
Hope you make it to our fly-in Gilan Home Built 0 September 7th 03 04:46 AM
Bob Hope Bill Kambic Naval Aviation 2 August 4th 03 01:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.