If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
JPI EDM700 v EI UBG16 - comments?
Hi, Peter -
I used an EI 16-channel non-graphic monitor for five years (don't remember the model number, but they still sell it) and found it and the probes to be reliable. There was some occasional problem with the inline connectors, but they were old when I started using them. That airplane is sold and I have now bought an EI UBG-16 for the new airplane. I have not yet taken possession of the airplane so the monitor is not installed. EI so far has been great and doesn't worry about a few bucks when trying to help you with a problem. Engine monitors and engine heaters and factory CHT probes always seem to conflict. I bought a Tanis heater but got the bolt heaters that replace one of the intake tube flange bolts on each cylinder. I also bought a Tanis washer-type thermocouple probe that supposedly works under the factory CHT gauge rather than using a washer-type probe that goes under a spark plug. So in some weeks ahead I can report on how this all worked out. Stan "Peter" wrote in message ... Hi A colleague (who is not on the internet) is looking at one or the other, for his 4-seat IFR tourer. I personally have an EDM700 and after an initial replacement when new (buggy firmware, could not download data to a PC) it has been working fine. I am not impressed with the probes; I've had two fail in 4 years. The EDM data download feature is dreadful; often I get corrupted downloads which need to be emailed to JPI and then I have to hassle them to get around to retrieving the data. This tends to result from the data queue having overflowed, but obviously one should still be able to retrieve data on *complete* flights. On paper, the EI version looks a lot better, but I have never met anybody who has one. They claim more rugged probes in particular. Any views would be much appreciated. As an aside, wasn't there a big lawsuit in this department, some years ago? Peter. -- Return address is invalid to help stop junk mail. E-mail replies to but remove the A and the B. Please do NOT copy usenet posts to email - it is NOT necessary. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
JPI EDM700 v EI UBG16 - comments? | soxinbox | Owning | 1 | October 19th 06 06:40 PM |
JPI EDM700 v EI UBG16 - comments? | Stan Prevost | Owning | 0 | October 15th 06 12:33 AM |
JPI EDM700 v EI UBG16 - comments? | Huck | Owning | 0 | October 14th 06 02:16 PM |
JPI EDM700 v EI UBG16 - comments? | Huck | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | October 14th 06 02:16 PM |
JPI EDM700 v EI UBG16 - comments? | Matt Barrow | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | October 14th 06 02:00 PM |