If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Responses in-line
"Dude" wrote in message ... nobody wrote: I had a brief meeting with my CEO last week. Our company spends 80K - 120K annually on commercial flights. He knows I am a private pilot and he asked me if I could prepare a comparative analysis of alternatives such as fractional ownership, outright ownership, leaseback or charter. I don't know jack about jets. My assumption is that I'm looking at a jet versus a King Air or similar. We're based in Houston and regularly fly to both coasts with 3 - 6 passengers. I am looking at a large, empty spreadsheet. Many manufacturers and brokers offer breakdowns for their products but I am looking for a non-biased source for several pieces of information. 1.) Where can I find non-biased, mostly accurate estimate of direct and indirect operating costs? 2.) There are several business jet models available for 1,000,000 like the Hawker DH 125, Sabre, Citation 500, Lear 24 and 25, Jet Commander. Short of looking up all the AD's for each variation of each model, where can I find an honest review of those models with both pros and cons? 3.) Is $1,000,000 reasonable or should I expect those aircraft to be in need of some serious work, AD compliance, or expensive upgrades to meet RVSM certification? 4.) Anybody know what a full time corporate pilot makes nowadays? TIA, Ed 1) There are some reports you can get Conklin and Decker I believe. ------------ Yeah, thanks, somebody mentioned that earlier. I've got their website and I'll follow up this week. ------------ 2) I would be really interested to hear what business you are in and how your customers would find a good, non biased source. Short of consumer goods, there really is no such thing. At any rate, do not bother. None of those models will likely fit the needs you have described and save you money. A jet's value is often a reflection of operating costs (much like piston twins being cheaper than a similar single when old). Jets under a million are often costly to operate, which is why they can be had so cheaply. ------------ We develop, sell, install and support a suite of software packages for fortune 250 companies. We give them the software for 60 days. If they like it they buy it. If not the software quits working. Wonder where I can borrow a Gulfstream V for 60 days for free so I can evaluate it? We are a far cry from a "manufacturing" company but you can easily draw an analogy to one. The idea behind establishing a flight department is to increase our production capacity. Simply put, the faster we can get from one customer to another, the more product we can install, the more income we can realize. Currently, we can do about 5 installations, including training, per month depending upon how much the customer chooses to customize the installation. Reducing round trips by a day on both ends reduces hotel, car, meals and fatigue. The team should be able to increase to 8 or 9 installations a month (approx 2 per week) assuming our sales department can keep them booked up like they do now. ------------ 3) Only your boss can answer that question. How cheap, slow, and light can he go? If the same people are doing all the traveling, and they are willing to become pilots, you could be in good shape with a couple Mooney's. OTOH, many of the folks you need to move may be scared of anything with a prop. ------------ I have a PA28-161 and have used it on several occasions to service accounts in San Antonio, Austin, Dallas, Lufkin, Bartlesville, OK and Baton Rouge. Those trips were less than spectacular because I assumed the role of one of the specialists on the team and I still had my head in the cockpit when I got to the client. My mind began to drift to weather and flight plans long before the real work was done. Speed is the value here. A slow expensive airplane will not pay for itself. ------------ 4) Much of this is affected by risk. You can likely get a guy to manage and fly the plane for 60 to 80, but you also will spend training money on him. These costs are reflected in the C+D. He also will not be REALLY full time. If your corporate culture will demand this guy fits in like the rest of the mucks, you will end up paying more or having turnover. ------------ Full time referring only to the idea that we are his/(her) first priority and it may be on short notice. ------------ Buying your own corporate jet will not save money from a cost only perspective. ------------ Understood and agreed. The only possible justification is the increased efficiency of our installation teams. ------------ If you want something to take to your boss, talk to Western Airways at SGR and talk to some of these card companies like Marquis. Get an idea of the possibilities and lay out a trial plan with business objectives for the trial. You want to determine if the benefits and savings in other areas (time, ground travel, hotel, etc.) are worth further study in alternate transportation methods. Experiment with a charter of a low cost plane and one of the fractional use cards for the top guys to try out. If they want to go forward after those trials it will likely be worthwhile to talk to a consultant. ------------ The cost here is the team concept. We have tried the one man wears all hats routine and it fails miserably. When we go onsite, the bare minimum team size is 2. Depending upon the customer, the relationship and the size of the deal, there may be as many as 6 employees traveling to the same customer. I'll give western a call tomorrow. SGR is only about 10 min from the office. That's another time savings. ------------ You will find that the lower cost an employ is, the better it is send them comercial. ------------ See above: Multiple mid-level employees ------------ Also, if you are going from Houston to other large metro's at either coast, its going to be hard to beat the regular carriers unless you can identify ground time savings using specific airports on both ends. OTOH, if you want to go from Houston to Shrevesport you might as well buy a plane. ------------ Thats the key. Just guessing but I would say that only 15 or 20 percent of our customers lie within 50 miles of a commercial airport. ------------ Lastly, worry less about bias at first. If Cessna can't make it look good to buy their plane, then why worry about their bias? ------------ Good point. ------------ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ANN is biased ZZZJJJ | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 30 | January 4th 04 01:58 PM |