If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On 8/25/2005 14:33, Peter wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote If you're flying a GPS approach at your primary airport, the alternate airport must have a non-GPS IAP. If the only non-GPS IAP requires DME, then you need to have DME operational in the aircraft. Thank you for saving me looking this up However, I get the impression that Americans worry about this detail about as much as Europeans worry about carrying an ADF when doing NDB approaches Also note that this is a consideration for the selection of the airport as an alternate. Once you get to the airport, you land any which way you want (using GPS, etc.). -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Student Sacramento, CA |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On 8/25/2005 14:49, Peter wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote Well, as a student, I have to worry about all the rules equally ;-) You can imagine the fun that a European pilot has at the FAA IR oral Or indeed the FAA PPL oral. The examiner of course knows that no matter how many hours the pilot has, he won't know anything about roughly 40% of the material unless he has been reading the books over and over and over. I was coming to that conclusion after listening to this thread today. I guess I'm lucky that I can't afford to fly outside of the U.S. ;-) -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Student Sacramento, CA |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Peter wrote: Mark Hansen wrote If you're flying a GPS approach at your primary airport, the alternate airport must have a non-GPS IAP. If the only non-GPS IAP requires DME, then you need to have DME operational in the aircraft. Thank you for saving me looking this up However, I get the impression that Americans worry about this detail about as much as Europeans worry about carrying an ADF when doing NDB approaches If your GPS is WAAS capable then the requirement goes away in the US. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
On 25 Aug 2005 11:39:37 -0700, "gwengler" wrote:
The new Mooney Ovation2GX, with long-range tanks, has more than enough range to make that flight. How much fuel would you have in total including the long range tanks? Gerd With the long range tanks, the total fuel capacity is 130 gallons. That gives a maximum range (with reserves) of 2400NM. Although I could make it non-stop from my home base, I would plan a fuel stop at CYYT (St. John's, NF), from which LPL is "only" about 1250 NM. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:44:01 +0100, Peter wrote:
A DME is IMHO a lot more important than an ADF - again in the event of a GPS failure, or a RAIM failure. Even in the USA, no-DME restricts the choice of a destination/alternate, IIRC. I don't believe there is any restriction for destinations, so long as the location of the DME fix is in the GPS receiver's database. For alternates there is some kind of requirement for a non-GPS approach if one is using a TSO129 box. But the TSO146 (WAAS) boxes have no requirement for a non-GPS approach at alternates. My experience has been with a CNX80/GNS480 so I'm not really up on the non-WAAS stuff. Americans must be really taking the **** reading all this crap... but in Europe, one spends most of the time without any radar service (even when IFR, in the UK) so it's different to the USA. I don't mind non-radar at all. But it sure seems as if European GA has a lot more restrictions than we do. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:35:35 -0700, Mark Hansen
wrote: On 8/25/2005 11:37, gwengler wrote: Even in the USA, no-DME restricts the choice of a destination/alternate, IIRC. How so? Gerd If you're flying a GPS approach at your primary airport, the alternate airport must have a non-GPS IAP. If the only non-GPS IAP requires DME, then you need to have DME operational in the aircraft. Keep in mind that I did not cite all the rules/regs concerning this issue, just the part that illustrates this point. Mark, That's true for most GPS receivers certified under TSO 129, but not true for WAAS enabled units certified under TSO 146. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:07:07 +0100, Peter wrote:
Ron Rosenfeld wrote: Thank you for that information. And I'll guess that the ferry pilot was probably flying an N-registered a/c, so I'm guessing the regulation applies to all. Yes, the SR20 is EASA certified but the SR22 isn't (yet). The SR20 got certified only over the dead body of some of the European CAAs, whose view is that a parachute isn't something a proper pilot should be provided with My wife is from the Azores, and it is possible we may go there for extended periods (e.g. several months). If we do, from what I have read, I would be able to fly IFR (and night) in my N-registered a/c with my FAA license; where I would not have those privileges in a Portugese registered a/c unless I took some onerous tests. To fly IFR in a Portugese reg aircraft you will need the JAA IR. You can get that from the FAA IR with a (minimum) of 15hrs additional flight training, plus the entire JAA PPL/IR ground school; approx 10 of the 14 ATPL ground exams. You will also need a JAA PPL to attach it to; a few hours' flying and a checkride, plus probably all the 6 (7?) PPL ground exams. You could file an IFR-VFR flight plan; so long as you are VFR at the European FIR boundary and thereafter, you are legal. In practice, as any European "VFR" pilot with actual instrument skills and a suitable aircraft knows, you've got to be VFR where you might get caught, so an IFR approach (ILS etc) is out of the question given you aren't on an IFR FP by then. So you have to make sure you are VFR say 10-20 miles out, and preferably out of CAS, and definitely below Class A I've done this sort of thing 100% legally off Italy, flying some 100 miles at 1000ft above the sea, 30 miles offshore so out of VHF radio contact. Americans have it pretty good! The new Mooney Ovation2GX, with long-range tanks, has more than enough range to make that flight. Now I just have to figure out how to pay for it :-). Marry a richer woman It will go across the Atlantic?? What about the winds when going East? I don't believe folk fly in the winter, when the winds are strongest. But there are no legs to Europe longer than CYYT-LPL (St. John's, NF -- Lajes Field, Azores) and that's only 1/2 the maximum range of the a/c. I may have missed this bit, so let me ask again: Is it a true statement that, so long as I have the required equipment, I can exercise my FAA IFR privileges in Europe so long as I am flying an N-registered a/c? Thanks. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Ron,
Is it a true statement that, so long as I have the required equipment, I can exercise my FAA IFR privileges in Europe so long as I am flying an N-registered a/c? Yes. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
I'v flown a couple of Austrian-registered Diamond Stars here in the US.
They had ADF and DME. My Star was built in Austria and has DME, but I didn't have them install the ADF (although the ground plane and attachment pad for the ADF antenna are there). Yes, but did they also have the G1000? -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 07:14:03 +0100, Peter wrote:
Ron Rosenfeld wrote I may have missed this bit, so let me ask again: Is it a true statement that, so long as I have the required equipment, I can exercise my FAA IFR privileges in Europe so long as I am flying an N-registered a/c? Yes. This link might have useful info for European IFR http://www.peter2000.co.uk/aviation/...fr-flying.html Thank you for that link. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Barometer Setting in Europe question... | Piloting | 19 | April 3rd 05 09:43 PM | |
Flying Holiday in Europe | Udo Rumpf | Soaring | 17 | March 23rd 05 03:08 PM |
USA armed URSS to keep down Europe | IO | Military Aviation | 9 | October 21st 03 07:19 AM |
Airmen in Europe may go back to three-month rotation schedules | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 22nd 03 11:47 PM |
Could it happen he The High Cost of Operating in Europe | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 5 | July 14th 03 02:34 AM |