If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
BUSH SERVED HONORABLY AND HE'S GOT THE MEDALS TO PROVE IT
BUSH SERVED HONORABLY AND HE'S GOT THE MEDALS TO PROVE IT
__________________ At least one picture exists that shows Bush wearing ribbons that don't appear on his discharge. Walt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
No but according to today's news his commanders
did it all for him. He didn't have to do a thing according to the reports Bob E "Ian MacLure" wrote in message ... wrote in : BUSH SERVED HONORABLY AND HE'S GOT THE MEDALS TO PROVE IT He served hono(u)rably and failed to consort with the enemy or commit treason while an officer. He has his National Defence Service Medal and Expert Marksman's ribbon. Oh, and he got to wear his unit's citation ribbon while he was attached. Its not like he manufactured bogus Purple Hearts or falsified write ups for medals awarded for valo(ur) unlike someone we could mention. IBM __________________________________________________ __________________________ ___ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In sci.military.naval Ian MacLure wrote:
wrote in : BUSH SERVED HONORABLY AND HE'S GOT THE MEDALS TO PROVE IT He served hono(u)rably and failed to consort with the enemy or commit treason while an officer. He has his National Defence Service Medal and Expert Marksman's ribbon. Oh, and he got to wear his unit's citation ribbon while he was attached. Its not like he manufactured bogus Purple Hearts or falsified write ups for medals awarded for valo(ur) unlike someone we could mention. Four years ago, the draft-dodger Bush was running against somebody who volunteered for the Army and was on the ground in Vietnam, albeit in a non-combat role. Nevertheless he managed to make himself look like the hero and the volunteer look like a coward. You would think he would be put off this year by the prospect of running against somebody who volunteered for the Navy, served a full non-combat tour, then volunteered for another tour and for combat, and was awarded a Silver Star, a Bronze Star, and three Purple Hearts. But no, he is not fazed a bit, and is trying to do it again...and apparently having some success. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Merlin Dorfman" wrote in message ... Four years ago, the draft-dodger Bush was running against somebody who volunteered for the Army and was on the ground in Vietnam, albeit in a non-combat role. Nevertheless he managed to make himself look like the hero and the volunteer look like a coward. He did? Odd, I don't recall him doing that. How'd he do it? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Merlin Dorfman" wrote in message ... In sci.military.naval Ian MacLure wrote: wrote in : BUSH SERVED HONORABLY AND HE'S GOT THE MEDALS TO PROVE IT He served hono(u)rably and failed to consort with the enemy or commit treason while an officer. He has his National Defence Service Medal and Expert Marksman's ribbon. Oh, and he got to wear his unit's citation ribbon while he was attached. Its not like he manufactured bogus Purple Hearts or falsified write ups for medals awarded for valo(ur) unlike someone we could mention. Four years ago, the draft-dodger Bush was running against somebody who volunteered for the Army and was on the ground in Vietnam, albeit in a non-combat role. Nevertheless he managed to make himself look like the hero and the volunteer look like a coward. You would think he would be put off this year by the prospect of running against somebody who volunteered for the Navy, served a full non-combat tour, then volunteered for another tour and for combat, No, he did NOT volunteer for combat, he made that patently clear in a previous book he contributed to: "I didn't really want to get involved in the war," Kerry said in a little-noticed contribution to a book of Vietnam reminiscences published in 1986. "When I signed up for the swift boats, they had very little to do with the war. They were engaged in coastal patrolling and that's what I thought I was going to be doing." http://www.boston.com/globe/nation/p...y/061603.shtml Unfortunately for John, the mission of the boats changed about the time he arrived in country--can you say "oops"? Which may explain his desire to gather as many Purple Hearts for questionable wounds as fast as he could get them... and was awarded a Silver Star, a Bronze Star, Oddly enough, for some strange reason a second certificate, differing in terms of wording from the original one, was cut for the BS and allegedly signed by John Lehman as SecNav some ten or twelve years after Kerry received it--something Lehman now says is suspicious because he does not recall signing such a document (and Lehman did not serve during a period where he would have been called upon to sign very many BS certificates). and three Purple Hearts. But by his own admission in his journal kept during his tour, the first PH was improperly awarded--on 11 Dec, nine days *after* he supposedly was wounded and wrote himself up for his first PH, he recorded that up until that time he had NOT been fired at by the enemy. That was his admission *at the time*--now he says otherwise. Curious, huh? But no, he is not fazed a bit, and is trying to do it again...and apparently having some success. He does not have to DO anything--Kerry's *own* words are sinking him. He made a BIG mistake in writing that earlier contribution for the collective Vietnam book that yielded the quote I gave you above, and then he really screwed up by giving Brinkely his journals when he tasked him with writing "Tour of Duty". His OWN words are what is making him out ot be the liar that he is, not those of Bush, and not those of the SBVT. Brooks |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
A small correction.
'Assigned', not "attached". Buck "Ian MacLure" wrote in message ... wrote in : BUSH SERVED HONORABLY AND HE'S GOT THE MEDALS TO PROVE IT He served hono(u)rably and failed to consort with the enemy or commit treason while an officer. He has his National Defence Service Medal and Expert Marksman's ribbon. Oh, and he got to wear his unit's citation ribbon while he was attached. Its not like he manufactured bogus Purple Hearts or falsified write ups for medals awarded for valo(ur) unlike someone we could mention. IBM __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Merlin.
Before you disappear forever, it was Al Gore who told the lies in Vanity Fair magazine, then got tripped up by them years later. Bush said NOTHING about it. Thanks for playing. PLONK!! "Merlin Dorfman" wrote in message ... In sci.military.naval Ian MacLure wrote: wrote in : BUSH SERVED HONORABLY AND HE'S GOT THE MEDALS TO PROVE IT He served hono(u)rably and failed to consort with the enemy or commit treason while an officer. He has his National Defence Service Medal and Expert Marksman's ribbon. Oh, and he got to wear his unit's citation ribbon while he was attached. Its not like he manufactured bogus Purple Hearts or falsified write ups for medals awarded for valo(ur) unlike someone we could mention. Four years ago, the draft-dodger Bush was running against somebody who volunteered for the Army and was on the ground in Vietnam, albeit in a non-combat role. Nevertheless he managed to make himself look like the hero and the volunteer look like a coward. You would think he would be put off this year by the prospect of running against somebody who volunteered for the Navy, served a full non-combat tour, then volunteered for another tour and for combat, and was awarded a Silver Star, a Bronze Star, and three Purple Hearts. But no, he is not fazed a bit, and is trying to do it again...and apparently having some success. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"B2431" wrote in message ... It's the NEOCON way. You have been asked many times to define "neocon." Why do you refuse to do so? It's because he doesn't know. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|