A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"certified' parts



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 13th 05, 10:53 PM
Jimmy B.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "certified' parts

Yesterday, I attended a FAA safety seminar where the topic was
maintenance issues. I walked away with a few surprising nuggets of
information. These issues have been discussed here in the past and some
of the information posited here disagreed with what the FAA said. So, I
thought it would be useful to list them here.

Now, before everyone flames me and tells me I'm an idiot, these are not
my opinions, they are the opinions of the Safety Inspectors at
Washington - Dulles FSDO.

Manuals:
You must have current service manuals to do any (including preventative)
maintenance on your bird. That includes all service letters. A few
pilots grumbled that certain companies will not send the service letters
to the owners. The Safety Inspector said that didn't matter. Missing a
service letter makes the manual out of date and unusable.

Parts:
You must buy the parts from an aviation source. Someone brought up that
landing lights can be bought cheaper at automotive supply stores than
from aviation outlets at a fraction of the cost. The FAA wouldn't hear
of it. It does not matter if the part is made by the same company with
an identical part number, if you didn't get it from an aviation source,
then it is not an airworthy part. The Safety Inspector gave three
examples, the light bulb above, an alternator belt, and an air filter.

I guess that the alternator belt part number you would get in a
automotive store has fewer layers of material in it than the one
approved for aviation. The belts were the same dimensions, but there
was an extra layer in the aviation belt, but they both had the same part
numbers.

The air filter from some airplanes also fit some automobiles. Same Fram
part number. The Inspector used this as a uncertainty example. Are the
parts exactly the same, who knows?

I was going to ask him how do we know that we're getting approved parts
from aviation houses if the manufacturers use identical part numbers for
aviation approved and non approved parts. But by the end of this
discussion, he was getting kind of ticked by all the questions, so I
took a pass.

Logs:

All preventative maintenance must be logged, including updating the
database on your GPS unit. So, if you have updated your GPS database
and did not log it, you're not airworthy. This one caught a lot of pilots.
  #2  
Old March 13th 05, 11:21 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jimmy B. wrote:
: I guess that the alternator belt part number you would get in a
: automotive store has fewer layers of material in it than the one
: approved for aviation. The belts were the same dimensions, but there
: was an extra layer in the aviation belt, but they both had the same part
: numbers.

I call bull**** on this one. A part number from one manufacturer is a part
number. If its a different part, it's got a different number. Now, if someone says a
Wicks P/N-XYZPQ is the same as an Autolite P/N-XYZPQ, then I might believe it.

: I was going to ask him how do we know that we're getting approved parts
: from aviation houses if the manufacturers use identical part numbers for
: aviation approved and non approved parts. But by the end of this
: discussion, he was getting kind of ticked by all the questions, so I
: took a pass.

Sound about right. The FAA rules/regs sound ominous, and are written in
"airtight" legaleaze. If you try to corner someone on the details, however, the final
interpretation is done by the specific person you ask. The "ultimate authority" is
the *specific FAA person* at *YOUR* FSDO you asked at the time. They may be
right/wrong, but they're the one that interprets something as "legal." An immediate
corollary of this is that as soon as there's a problem, *SOMEONE* will find something
wrong, and since it's their interprettation, you are wrong.

: All preventative maintenance must be logged, including updating the
: database on your GPS unit. So, if you have updated your GPS database
: and did not log it, you're not airworthy. This one caught a lot of pilots.

Just remember that there isn't a single solitary aircraft currently flying
that's actually airworthy. I don't care if it just rolled off the manufacturer's lot.
The guy who pumped fuel into it last didn't clip the grounding lug on the 100LL truck
to the "approved ground," thus performing an illegal servicing of the craft and
rendering it unairworthy.

Running around crying "the sky is falling," tends to be a debilitating
proposition WRT flying. It's *IMPOSSIBLE* to keep an aircraft airworthy, because the
actual laws are subject to individual FAA interpretation. The GPS update may seem a
bit crazy, but in the highly unlikely case that an improper update causes a crash and
ensuing investigation, it will becoming immediately very important. A few bits I try
to remember when talking about issues like this:

- "Hi! We're the FAA and we're not happy until you're not happy"
- "Hi! We're the FAA. If you don't have a problem, we won't have any problems, but
if you have a problem, we'll find a problem."

I take that to mean that be smart WRT certified parts. Don't go to Ace
Hardware for your propeller bolts, but at the same time you don't need to buy nitrogen
to fill your struts directly from Piper, either.

-Cory (this $h*t really irritates me as it's still slowly killing GA)


************************************************** ***********************
* Cory Papenfuss *
* Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
************************************************** ***********************

  #3  
Old March 14th 05, 03:41 AM
Darrel Toepfer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jimmy B. wrote:

All preventative maintenance must be logged, including updating the
database on your GPS unit. So, if you have updated your GPS database
and did not log it, you're not airworthy. This one caught a lot of pilots.


You must be thinking panel mounted... There are lots of time line rules
in regards to IFR panels...
  #4  
Old March 14th 05, 03:33 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Some parts, like Timken tapered roller wheel bearings, carry the same
part number as the industrial bearings, but the Quality Testing as the
factory is different for the aviation bearings. They will test 1 out of
ten for aviation instead of 1 out of 500 for industry. The factory also
puts away a lot more money to cover their butts when we pilots act
stupid, crash an airplane, and our families sue everyone that had
anything at all to do with that airplane in the last 18 years.
Including Timken, who somehow was negligent because their bearing
allowed us to fly VFR in IMC.
In Canada, the government is working on a "Commercial
Equivalent" provision to allow us to use industrial stuff that carries
the same part number as the aviation version. In that case, I suppose,
we mechanics would carry the liability instead of the manufacturer and
vendors. It's always someone else's fault, see?

Dan

  #5  
Old March 14th 05, 04:24 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
oups.com...
Some parts, like Timken tapered roller wheel bearings, carry the same
part number as the industrial bearings, but the Quality Testing as the
factory is different for the aviation bearings. They will test 1 out of
ten for aviation instead of 1 out of 500 for industry. The factory also
puts away a lot more money to cover their butts when we pilots act
stupid, crash an airplane, and our families sue everyone that had
anything at all to do with that airplane in the last 18 years.
Including Timken, who somehow was negligent because their bearing
allowed us to fly VFR in IMC.
In Canada, the government is working on a "Commercial
Equivalent" provision to allow us to use industrial stuff that carries
the same part number as the aviation version. In that case, I suppose,
we mechanics would carry the liability instead of the manufacturer and
vendors. It's always someone else's fault, see?

Dan


The additional testing does nothing for the quality of the bearings it just
raises the cost.

Mike
MU-2


  #6  
Old March 14th 05, 05:44 PM
Mike Granby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


You must buy the parts from an aviation source. Someone
brought up that landing lights can be bought cheaper at
automotive supply stores than from aviation outlets at a
fraction of the cost. The FAA wouldn't hear of it.


Indeed. That's why the FAA doesn't hear of it, even though everyone
does it.

All preventative maintenance must be logged, including
updating the database on your GPS unit. So, if you
have updated your GPS database and did not log it, you're
not airworthy. This one caught a lot of pilots.


An FAA guy has to say this. He can't go around saying that you don't
have to follow the rules. However, I'd be very surprised if you can
find anyone who has been busted for not logging database updates on
their GPS. (Someone will now pop-up and repeat the nonsence about how
not logging it will void your insurance...)

  #7  
Old March 14th 05, 08:01 PM
John Kunkel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jimmy B." wrote in message
k.net...
Yesterday, I attended a FAA safety seminar where the topic was maintenance
issues. I walked away with a few surprising nuggets of information.
These issues have been discussed here in the past and some of the
information posited here disagreed with what the FAA said. So, I thought
it would be useful to list them here.

Now, before everyone flames me and tells me I'm an idiot, these are not my
opinions, they are the opinions of the Safety Inspectors at Washington -
Dulles FSDO.


Another in the list of excuses for mandating parts procurement from an
aviation supplier is the paper trail, a Fram filter from Autozone has no
paper trail to the source.

When confronting the FAA with the simple fact that anyone with a quality
printer can "create" a paper trail you'll be greeted with a shrug.


  #8  
Old March 14th 05, 09:11 PM
OtisWinslow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jimmy B." wrote in message
k.net...

Manuals:
You must have current service manuals to do any (including preventative)
maintenance on your bird.


What maintenance? (wink wink)

Parts:
You must buy the parts from an aviation source.


What parts? (wink wink)


All preventative maintenance must be logged ...


What preventative maintenance? (wink wink)



  #9  
Old March 14th 05, 09:45 PM
Denny
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Slick Willie wrote the book, "Don't ask. Don't tell." Listen to Uncle
Willie...

denny

  #10  
Old March 15th 05, 12:54 AM
Mike W.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

OK, how 'bout this. Buy one landing light from Super-Duper-Spruce-Goose or
whoever. Keep the invoice. Now head down to NAPA and buy a dozen of the same
make and part number of lamp. Boy, that lamp I bought just seems to last and
last. Wonder when it will burn out?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 40 October 3rd 08 03:13 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 December 2nd 04 08:00 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 September 2nd 04 05:15 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 June 2nd 04 07:17 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.