A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Wind/Solar Electrics ???



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old December 16th 05, 01:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning,sci.electronics.design,alt.solar.photovoltaic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wind/Solar Electrics ???

RST Engineering wrote:
After much thought and ponderance, I've come to the conclusion that to
electrify the hangar using Pacific Gas & Electricity (PG&E -- Pigs, Goats,
and Elephants) isn't clever. By the time you get them to hang a meter
($5k), trench from the power pole to the end of the row of hangars, conduit
romex to 35 hangars at a cost somewhere around $50k ($1500 per hangar), and
then pay the monthly electric bill, you could buy a hell of a wind/solar
system and perch it on the (flat) hangar roof.


yes, thats when solar pv starts to look good.


Before I flail about gathering data, has anybody on these ngs actually
installed a design whereby a hefty solar panel charges a hefty battery to
run a hefty inverter?
It doesn't have to be absolutely "clean" sinewave
power as all we are running are fluorescent shop lights (about 400 watts
worth), every now and again a small compressor, a small drill press, a small
grinder, but none of these last few at the same time.


There are 2 main invertor options, sine or modified sine, which is IRL
rectangular wave. IIRC, iron fl ballasts and motors can overheat on
MSW, so all your apps ideally want sine. However MSW is much cheaper,
and there are workarounds. Fl lights can be run at just slightly
reduced power, or heatsinks added to the ballasts, etc. Electronic
ballast lights would run happily on 150v dc. Motor driven tools would
be fine as is unless youre running them to where they already get
seriously hot, ie heavy use. There are ways round it if it proves to be
an issue.


My hit on it is that a 2 kW inverter would be more than enough to handle the
AC side of it, and a bank of 12 volt truck batteries would work for the DC
side of it, but there are the problems of parallelling large batteries, how
to combine the outputs of solar cells and wind generators, and a reasonable
source for all this stuff.


ok, first with those powers it would make more sense to run your
battery back at apx 150v (assuming you want 110v ac) and use a simple
chopper to produce the ac. Your output will then have unregulated
V_peak and regulated constant rms. That should work for all your loads.

You should add a parallel diode across each battery cell, so that one
cell going down has little effect on system performance, and enables
everything to continue running. Ditto with the panels, there its
particularly important to have a diode across every panel when youre
running them at HT.

This avoids parallelling batteries (not that thats needed anyway), plus
reduces cost of invertor and wiring. Also it means you can supply 150v
dc to mains CFL bulbs, electronic ballasted fl lights, and anything
else that rectifies the mains, again cutting down on system cost and
improving reliability. Use a different plug/socket type for the dc
supply.

One way to shave 10-20% off power consumption would be to up your
supply frequency slightly, this would work nicely with magentic ballast
lights and brushed motors, but not induction motors. FWIW brushed
motors can run on dc anyway - but not @ 150v.


Solar pv is cheaper than wind, and has less significantly issues, so
I'd stick to solar.


There are issues around protecting the solar cells from hail, which we do
get from time to time, battery acidic gases inside a hangar where a very
expensive lump of aluminum is sitting for months on end,


Battery case is vented to the outside.


sizing the solar
cell and wind generators, and other considerations along these lines.

Comments appreciated.


Jim


alt.solar.photovoltaic is the place to go.

Also dont overlook simple ways to cut cost. A minimal cost reflector
outside a window can be used to increase daylight levels, and delay
lighting dwitch on until later in the day, thus reducing system cost.
And of course a switchbank for your lighting will enable you to use the
lights only where theyre wanted at the time. No sense lighting the
whole place up bright when youre only working in one area.

And dont forget batteries dont last forever, you need to account for
future replacement. Beating your PG&E costs should not be difficult, as
long as its designed competently.


NT

  #22  
Old December 16th 05, 01:55 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning,sci.electronics.design,alt.solar.photovoltaic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wind/Solar Electrics ???

On 15 Dec 2005
RST Engineering wrote:
After much thought and ponderance, I've come to the conclusion that to
electrify the hangar using Pacific Gas & Electricity (PG&E -- Pigs, Goats,
and Elephants) isn't clever. By the time you get them to hang a meter
($5k), trench from the power pole to the end of the row of hangars, conduit
romex to 35 hangars at a cost somewhere around $50k ($1500 per hangar), and
then pay the monthly electric bill, you could buy a hell of a wind/solar
system and perch it on the (flat) hangar roof.


You might start with a small bank of golf cart batteries from Sam's
Club, and a refurbished inverter/charger from here
http://www.sunelec.com/Distributors_...cccltrace.html A Trace
SW would be best, but you'd probably be happy with a DR. Use a Honda
EU2000 for a charger to get started and as a backup later on. Add PV
as your budget allows. Excellent info on home built wind turbines here
http://www.otherpower.com/. There's no problem paralleling solar and
wind charge controllers. Include a proper system monitor like an
E-Meter or TriMetric.

Wayne
  #23  
Old December 16th 05, 04:27 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wind/Solar Electrics ???

On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:02:56 -0800, "RST Engineering"
wrote:

After much thought and ponderance, I've come to the conclusion that to
electrify the hangar using Pacific Gas & Electricity (PG&E -- Pigs, Goats,
and Elephants) isn't clever. By the time you get them to hang a meter
($5k), trench from the power pole to the end of the row of hangars, conduit
romex to 35 hangars at a cost somewhere around $50k ($1500 per hangar), and
then pay the monthly electric bill, you could buy a hell of a wind/solar
system and perch it on the (flat) hangar roof.

Before I flail about gathering data, has anybody on these ngs actually
installed a design whereby a hefty solar panel charges a hefty battery to
run a hefty inverter? It doesn't have to be absolutely "clean" sinewave
power as all we are running are fluorescent shop lights (about 400 watts
worth), every now and again a small compressor, a small drill press, a small
grinder, but none of these last few at the same time.

My hit on it is that a 2 kW inverter would be more than enough to handle the
AC side of it, and a bank of 12 volt truck batteries would work for the DC
side of it, but there are the problems of parallelling large batteries, how
to combine the outputs of solar cells and wind generators, and a reasonable
source for all this stuff.

There are issues around protecting the solar cells from hail, which we do
get from time to time, battery acidic gases inside a hangar where a very
expensive lump of aluminum is sitting for months on end, sizing the solar
cell and wind generators, and other considerations along these lines.

Comments appreciated.


Jim


Our cottage is off grid 400W worth of solar panels provide florescent
lighting plus enough left over to run a tv -satellite dish for an
hour or more off the inverter. storage is 8 12v deep cycle batteries.
To run power tools or the wringer washer I fire up the 2000w honda.
  #24  
Old December 16th 05, 06:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wind/Solar Electrics ???

Ross Richardson wrote:
Hey Jim,

Try looking through this.

http://www.homepower.com/

My son has provide me some literature on renewable energy and I am
convinced with some up front spending you can survive anywere without
the power grid. You may need a 5KW generator at time when the wind,
solar, etc give out.


-------------
Regards, Ross
C-172F 180HP
KSWI

RST Engineering wrote:

After much thought and ponderance, I've come to the conclusion that to
electrify the hangar using Pacific Gas & Electricity (PG&E -- Pigs,
Goats, and Elephants) isn't clever. By the time you get them to hang
a meter ($5k), trench from the power pole to the end of the row of
hangars, conduit romex to 35 hangars at a cost somewhere around $50k
($1500 per hangar), and then pay the monthly electric bill, you could
buy a hell of a wind/solar system and perch it on the (flat) hangar roof.

Before I flail about gathering data, has anybody on these ngs actually
installed a design whereby a hefty solar panel charges a hefty battery
to run a hefty inverter? It doesn't have to be absolutely "clean"
sinewave power as all we are running are fluorescent shop lights
(about 400 watts worth), every now and again a small compressor, a
small drill press, a small grinder, but none of these last few at the
same time.

My hit on it is that a 2 kW inverter would be more than enough to
handle the AC side of it, and a bank of 12 volt truck batteries would
work for the DC side of it, but there are the problems of parallelling
large batteries, how to combine the outputs of solar cells and wind
generators, and a reasonable source for all this stuff.

There are issues around protecting the solar cells from hail, which we
do get from time to time, battery acidic gases inside a hangar where a
very expensive lump of aluminum is sitting for months on end, sizing
the solar cell and wind generators, and other considerations along
these lines.

Comments appreciated.


Jim


http://www.tinaja.com/glib/energfun.pdf


--
Many thanks,

Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email:

Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at
http://www.tinaja.com
  #25  
Old December 16th 05, 07:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wind/Solar Electrics ???

RST Engineering wrote:
After much thought and ponderance, I've come to the conclusion that to
electrify the hangar using Pacific Gas & Electricity (PG&E -- Pigs, Goats,
and Elephants) isn't clever. By the time you get them to hang a meter
($5k), trench from the power pole to the end of the row of hangars, conduit
romex to 35 hangars at a cost somewhere around $50k ($1500 per hangar), and
then pay the monthly electric bill, you could buy a hell of a wind/solar
system and perch it on the (flat) hangar roof.

Before I flail about gathering data, has anybody on these ngs actually
installed a design whereby a hefty solar panel charges a hefty battery to
run a hefty inverter? It doesn't have to be absolutely "clean" sinewave
power as all we are running are fluorescent shop lights (about 400 watts
worth), every now and again a small compressor, a small drill press, a small
grinder, but none of these last few at the same time.

My hit on it is that a 2 kW inverter would be more than enough to handle the
AC side of it, and a bank of 12 volt truck batteries would work for the DC
side of it, but there are the problems of parallelling large batteries, how
to combine the outputs of solar cells and wind generators, and a reasonable
source for all this stuff.

There are issues around protecting the solar cells from hail, which we do
get from time to time, battery acidic gases inside a hangar where a very
expensive lump of aluminum is sitting for months on end, sizing the solar
cell and wind generators, and other considerations along these lines.


Hello Jim,

A good friend of mine went a bit overboard...

http://www.solarwarrior.com/

-jav
  #26  
Old December 16th 05, 08:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wind/Solar Electrics ???


Javier Henderson wrote:
RST Engineering wrote:
After much thought and ponderance, I've come to the conclusion that to
electrify the hangar using Pacific Gas & Electricity (PG&E -- Pigs, Goats,
and Elephants) isn't clever. By the time you get them to hang a meter
($5k), trench from the power pole to the end of the row of hangars, conduit
romex to 35 hangars at a cost somewhere around $50k ($1500 per hangar), and
then pay the monthly electric bill, you could buy a hell of a wind/solar
system and perch it on the (flat) hangar roof.

Before I flail about gathering data, has anybody on these ngs actually
installed a design whereby a hefty solar panel charges a hefty battery to
run a hefty inverter? It doesn't have to be absolutely "clean" sinewave
power as all we are running are fluorescent shop lights (about 400 watts
worth), every now and again a small compressor, a small drill press, a small
grinder, but none of these last few at the same time.

My hit on it is that a 2 kW inverter would be more than enough to handle the
AC side of it, and a bank of 12 volt truck batteries would work for the DC
side of it, but there are the problems of parallelling large batteries, how
to combine the outputs of solar cells and wind generators, and a reasonable
source for all this stuff.

There are issues around protecting the solar cells from hail, which we do
get from time to time, battery acidic gases inside a hangar where a very
expensive lump of aluminum is sitting for months on end, sizing the solar
cell and wind generators, and other considerations along these lines.


Hello Jim,

A good friend of mine went a bit overboard...

http://www.solarwarrior.com/


Here's a local family that went off the grid using a combination of
solar panels and (bio)diesel generators:

http://leavingthegrid.blogspot.com/

  #28  
Old December 17th 05, 04:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,sci.electronics.design,alt.solar.photovoltaic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wind/Solar Electrics ???

No doubt you are correct....

But a "modified sine wave" inverter is a way for someone to tell you that
you are buying a device which doesn't put out a proper sine wave... rather
one which consists of an approximate sinusoidal curve made up from square
bits...

So it's not a modified sine wave, but rather a near sine wave with lots of
edges... Inferior in every way (but price) to a real sine wave inverter...

Al...

"George Ghio" wrote in message
...


wrote:


There are 2 main invertor options, sine or modified sine, which is IRL
rectangular wave. IIRC, iron fl ballasts and motors can overheat on
MSW, so all your apps ideally want sine. However MSW is much cheaper,
and there are workarounds. Fl lights can be run at just slightly
reduced power, or heatsinks added to the ballasts, etc. Electronic
ballast lights would run happily on 150v dc. Motor driven tools would
be fine as is unless youre running them to where they already get
seriously hot, ie heavy use. There are ways round it if it proves to be
an issue.


Small point.

Why would anybody modify a sine wave?

When people try to sell a "Modified Sine wave" inverter they are either
ignorant or shysters.



  #29  
Old December 17th 05, 04:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,sci.electronics.design,alt.solar.photovoltaic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wind/Solar Electrics ???

"Spehro Pefhany" schreef in bericht
...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:33:33 +1100, the renowned George Ghio
wrote:



wrote:


There are 2 main invertor options, sine or modified sine, which is IRL
rectangular wave. IIRC, iron fl ballasts and motors can overheat on
MSW, so all your apps ideally want sine. However MSW is much cheaper,
and there are workarounds. Fl lights can be run at just slightly
reduced power, or heatsinks added to the ballasts, etc. Electronic
ballast lights would run happily on 150v dc. Motor driven tools would
be fine as is unless youre running them to where they already get
seriously hot, ie heavy use. There are ways round it if it proves to be
an issue.


Small point.

Why would anybody modify a sine wave?

When people try to sell a "Modified Sine wave" inverter they are either
ignorant or shysters.


To paraphrase a classic George Carlin routine- "I'll tell you what
'modified sine wave' means-- no f*cking sine waves".


I would label the boxes with a nice star shaped
sticker "powerful harmonic sine waves".

--
Thanks, Frank.
(remove 'q' and '.invalid' when replying by email)


  #30  
Old December 17th 05, 04:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,sci.electronics.design,alt.solar.photovoltaic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wind/Solar Electrics ???

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:33:33 +1100, the renowned George Ghio
wrote:



wrote:


There are 2 main invertor options, sine or modified sine, which is IRL
rectangular wave. IIRC, iron fl ballasts and motors can overheat on
MSW, so all your apps ideally want sine. However MSW is much cheaper,
and there are workarounds. Fl lights can be run at just slightly
reduced power, or heatsinks added to the ballasts, etc. Electronic
ballast lights would run happily on 150v dc. Motor driven tools would
be fine as is unless youre running them to where they already get
seriously hot, ie heavy use. There are ways round it if it proves to be
an issue.


Small point.

Why would anybody modify a sine wave?

When people try to sell a "Modified Sine wave" inverter they are either
ignorant or shysters.


To paraphrase a classic George Carlin routine- "I'll tell you what
'modified sine wave' means-- no f*cking sine waves".


Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question on 172 M electrics... (1974 Skyhawk II) [email protected] Piloting 8 April 10th 04 04:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.