A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cessna profits plunge......OT (or is it?)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 30th 04, 06:35 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cessna profits plunge......OT (or is it?)


"Nomen Nescio" ] wrote in message
...
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| BOSTON, Jan 29 (Reuters) - Textron Inc. TXT.N on Thursday
| said quarterly net income fell sharply as profit at its key
| Cessna aircraft division was cut more than 50 percent on slack
| demand for business jets.
|
| Revenue at Cessna plunged to $620 million from $896 million
| in the year-ago quarter. Profit fell to $43 million from $94
| million on lower sales of Citation business jets.
|
| Backlog for unfilled customer orders at Cessna was $4.4
| billion, or flat with the third quarter, Textron said.
|

Um, let's see. There is a backlog, meaning that they have more orders than
they can fill. So they cut production by 50%, tell their customers that no
planes will be available until 2006, then whine that their sales are down.
Whoever is running this company should be hanged. No, actually, drawn and
quartered -- and their living entrails burned before their very eyes.
Seriously, Cessna has a management problem. In fact, they have possibly the
worst management in their entire history -- and that is going some. I
believe that even I could turn that company around.


  #2  
Old January 30th 04, 07:39 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You have to size the company to the current market. What would you have
them do? Run flat out until they have no backlog and then go out of
business? Keep in mind that a lot of their backlog is for airplanes that
they couldn't ship (new models). .I don't know about Textron's management,
perhaps they are terrible but I don't see anything here that demonstrates
that they are.

Mike
MU-2


"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Nomen Nescio" ] wrote in

message
...
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| BOSTON, Jan 29 (Reuters) - Textron Inc. TXT.N on Thursday
| said quarterly net income fell sharply as profit at its key
| Cessna aircraft division was cut more than 50 percent on slack
| demand for business jets.
|
| Revenue at Cessna plunged to $620 million from $896 million
| in the year-ago quarter. Profit fell to $43 million from $94
| million on lower sales of Citation business jets.
|
| Backlog for unfilled customer orders at Cessna was $4.4
| billion, or flat with the third quarter, Textron said.
|

Um, let's see. There is a backlog, meaning that they have more orders than
they can fill. So they cut production by 50%, tell their customers that no
planes will be available until 2006, then whine that their sales are down.
Whoever is running this company should be hanged. No, actually, drawn and
quartered -- and their living entrails burned before their very eyes.
Seriously, Cessna has a management problem. In fact, they have possibly

the
worst management in their entire history -- and that is going some. I
believe that even I could turn that company around.




  #3  
Old January 30th 04, 09:24 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
nk.net...
| You have to size the company to the current market. What would you have
| them do? Run flat out until they have no backlog and then go out of
| business? Keep in mind that a lot of their backlog is for airplanes that
| they couldn't ship (new models). .I don't know about Textron's
management,
| perhaps they are terrible but I don't see anything here that demonstrates
| that they are.

It may be that I am just mad at Cessna because they keep promising stuff
that they don't deliver. We have a customer who ordered a 182 with the G1000
Nav III package back in November. Cessna promised him May delivery. Now they
are saying that their entire production line has been sold out, but maybe
they can get him a plane in December. They do this time and again,
constantly. They toyed with the idea of doing a second production run this
year, but instead they laid off all the workers. Smart, real smart.


  #4  
Old February 2nd 04, 07:06 AM
Dude
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You mean they don't have positions like the other folks?

I don't understand why they would do this to someone.


"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
nk.net...
| You have to size the company to the current market. What would you have
| them do? Run flat out until they have no backlog and then go out of
| business? Keep in mind that a lot of their backlog is for airplanes that
| they couldn't ship (new models). .I don't know about Textron's
management,
| perhaps they are terrible but I don't see anything here that

demonstrates
| that they are.

It may be that I am just mad at Cessna because they keep promising stuff
that they don't deliver. We have a customer who ordered a 182 with the

G1000
Nav III package back in November. Cessna promised him May delivery. Now

they
are saying that their entire production line has been sold out, but maybe
they can get him a plane in December. They do this time and again,
constantly. They toyed with the idea of doing a second production run this
year, but instead they laid off all the workers. Smart, real smart.




  #5  
Old January 30th 04, 10:10 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Revenue at Cessna plunged to $620 million from $896 million
in the year-ago quarter. Profit fell to $43 million from $94
million on lower sales of Citation business jets.


Gee, there's a surprise. I sure hope you didn't have a bunch of money
invested, cuz virtually anyone familiar with Cessna's product-line predicted
a severe downturn.

After all, other than jets, all they have to offer is a bunch of 50 year-old
designs, albeit with new electronics in 'em. And with used jets virtually a
dime a dozen now in "Executive Controller," who's going to buy a new one?

Cessna put all their eggs in one basket -- the jet market. When that fell
apart, they had little to fall back on. Meanwhile, Cirrus churns out three
new airplanes a day, every day...

The market is efficient, but ruthless...
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #6  
Old January 31st 04, 08:45 PM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:gDASb.189493$xy6.974561@attbi_s02...
Revenue at Cessna plunged to $620 million from $896 million
in the year-ago quarter. Profit fell to $43 million from $94
million on lower sales of Citation business jets.


Gee, there's a surprise. I sure hope you didn't have a bunch of money
invested, cuz virtually anyone familiar with Cessna's product-line

predicted
a severe downturn.

After all, other than jets, all they have to offer is a bunch of 50

year-old
designs, albeit with new electronics in 'em. And with used jets virtually

a
dime a dozen now in "Executive Controller," who's going to buy a new one?

Cessna put all their eggs in one basket -- the jet market. When that fell
apart, they had little to fall back on. Meanwhile, Cirrus churns out

three
new airplanes a day, every day...

The market is efficient, but ruthless...


Whadaya wanna bet that when they go back to full production, a "large
portion" is done off-shore?




  #7  
Old February 2nd 04, 06:14 PM
RevDMV
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

IMHO, Cessna should do what Cirrus did and bring in some folks who
have experience in JIT ,TPS(Toyota Production System) and other
inovative automotive manufacturing systems.

Cirrus obtained hired several ex-NUMMI(New United Motor Manufacturing)
people who have helped streamline the manufacturing and part supplier
chain. I remembering seeing early production floor pictures from
Cirrus and it resembled a local EAA chapter meeting more that a
production floor. It you see photos of the floor mow it's obvious that
there specific workstations and a real flow to the process.
  #8  
Old January 30th 04, 10:44 PM
Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"C J Campbell" wrote
Um, let's see. There is a backlog, meaning that they have more orders than
they can fill.


Well, your first problem is that you clearly have no idea what a
backlog is. Have you ever actually tried to run a business that
manufactures anything at all, never mind limited-market high-ticket
items? Do you know ANYTHING about manufacturing at all, or are you a
bean counter? Since the answer seems to be the latter, let me explain
the facts of life to you.

Everything has a lead time. Simple, common, and cheap parts have lead
times measured in days, and maybe even hours (sometimes you can send
someone out to pick it up). Complex, expensive, and limited
application parts can have lead times of literally months. Changes
are often not viable, because such parts are rarely standard. Changes
can have suble effects on operation, and not-so-subtle effects on
approvals. When most units you sell are expensive, complex, and
customized it is literally impossible to build anything as soon as it
comes in. Production must be scheduled, and parts must be ordered.
You simply can't survive without a backlog.

Depending on part lead times and assembly build times, the necessary
minimum backlog varies. In my business, the typical unit costs only
thousands or tens of thousands, we build several thousand units a
year, and we can't possibly survive with a backlog of less than about
3 months. Six months is more realistic. For a business that builds
hundreds of units costing several hundred thousand to several million,
a year or two of backlog sounds like a bare minimum.

So they cut production by 50%, tell their customers that no
planes will be available until 2006, then whine that their sales are down.


New airplanes are not purchased from stock. These are not passenger
cars, made largely standard and produced in lots of a million.

Whoever is running this company should be hanged. No, actually, drawn and
quartered -- and their living entrails burned before their very eyes.
Seriously, Cessna has a management problem. In fact, they have possibly the
worst management in their entire history -- and that is going some. I
believe that even I could turn that company around.


Yeah, I've met several accountants that thought they could run
manufacturing companies. When things went well, they were fired
before they could run the companies into the ground.

Michael
  #9  
Old January 31st 04, 01:27 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Michael" wrote in message
om...
"C J Campbell" wrote
Um, let's see. There is a backlog, meaning that they have more orders

than
they can fill.


Well, your first problem is that you clearly have no idea what a
backlog is. Have you ever actually tried to run a business that
manufactures anything at all, never mind limited-market high-ticket
items? Do you know ANYTHING about manufacturing at all, or are you a
bean counter? Since the answer seems to be the latter, let me explain
the facts of life to you.




Let me explain some facts to you: you are quite patronizing and
condescending. That's putting it mildly.


  #10  
Old January 31st 04, 07:10 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Michael" wrote in message
om...
| "C J Campbell" wrote
| Um, let's see. There is a backlog, meaning that they have more orders
than
| they can fill.
|
| Well, your first problem is that you clearly have no idea what a
| backlog is. Have you ever actually tried to run a business that
| manufactures anything at all, never mind limited-market high-ticket
| items? Do you know ANYTHING about manufacturing at all, or are you a
| bean counter? Since the answer seems to be the latter, let me explain
| the facts of life to you.
|
| Everything has a lead time.

Of course it does. Cessna has been underproducing for five years running,
now. Even those who are not bean counters should be able to expect that some
of those parts should have been delivered by now.

Before you start telling me the facts of life, you would do well to do them.
Have you ever had a position of responsibility higher than that of stock boy
or janitor? I doubt it.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models Ale Owning 3 October 22nd 13 03:40 PM
Cessna buyers in So. Cal. beware ! Bill Berle Aviation Marketplace 93 December 20th 04 02:17 PM
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! Enea Grande Aviation Marketplace 1 November 4th 03 12:57 AM
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! Enea Grande Owning 1 November 4th 03 12:57 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.