You know who you are

On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:12:41 -0600, nfw wrote:

On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:59:09 -0500, Phil
wrote:

On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:17:46 -0500, Phil wrote:

On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:49:21 -0500, Phil wrote:

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:04:44 -0800 (PST), Mark4 wrote:

You will be getting a visit tommorow. 11/22/2010 5:04:44 PM

I/m sorry, I had to step out for a smoke. Will you send them back?

Phil

I must have missed them again, Mark. Is my apology working? Have you
called off my incarceration and prosecution?

Will December be more fruitful for my demise?

Phil

Mark, could we set an appointment time for my incarceration. I am
available at 1400, 3Dec10, will that work?

Phil

Now you're being a pain in the ass, perhaps you are deserving of his
attention.

Easy for you to say, you're not going to spend eternity in jail.

Phil

On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:17:07 -0500, Kurt Ullman wrote:

In article ,
Phil wrote:


Phil

Mark, could we set an appointment time for my incarceration. I am
available at 1400, 3Dec10, will that work?

Phil

Could you do it around 4:30 or so? I'm busy at 2:00 and wouldn't
want to miss the perp walk.

Fine with me as long as I get a firm time.

Mark4 - 1630 OK?

Phil

On Dec 2, 11:02*am, Phil wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:17:07 -0500, Kurt Ullman wrote:
In article ,
*Phil wrote:

Phil

Mark, could we set an appointment time for my incarceration. I am
available at 1400, 3Dec10, will that work?

Phil

* * Could you do it around 4:30 or so? I'm busy at 2:00 and wouldn't
want to miss the perp walk.

Fine with me as long as I get a firm time.

Mark4 - 1630 OK?

Phil

I hate to say it but it appears that mark4 is full of ****.
All those threats and nothing ?

On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:33:42 -0800 (PST), george wrote:

On Dec 2, 11:02*am, Phil wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:17:07 -0500, Kurt Ullman wrote:
In article ,
*Phil wrote:

Phil

Mark, could we set an appointment time for my incarceration. I am
available at 1400, 3Dec10, will that work?

Phil

* * Could you do it around 4:30 or so? I'm busy at 2:00 and wouldn't
want to miss the perp walk.

Fine with me as long as I get a firm time.

Mark4 - 1630 OK?

Phil

I hate to say it but it appears that mark4 is full of ****.
All those threats and nothing ?

Please, don't rile him. He's serious.

Phil Lip

On Dec 4, 11:11*am, Phil wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:33:42 -0800 (PST), george wrote:
On Dec 2, 11:02 am, Phil wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:17:07 -0500, Kurt Ullman wrote:
In article ,
Phil wrote:

Phil

Mark, could we set an appointment time for my incarceration. I am
available at 1400, 3Dec10, will that work?

Phil

Could you do it around 4:30 or so? I'm busy at 2:00 and wouldn't
want to miss the perp walk.

Fine with me as long as I get a firm time.

Mark4 - 1630 OK?

Phil

I hate to say it but it appears that mark4 is full of ****.
All those threats and nothing ?

Please, don't rile him. He's serious.

Phil Lip

Such a hero cant deliver on its promise ?
I suggest you find a more credible kook to play with.

On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:35:02 -0800, John Sisker wrote:

"Phil" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:21:32 -0800 (PST), Mark4 wrote:

On Nov 22, 8:04 pm, Mark4 wrote:
You will be getting a visit tommorow.

You messed up big time.

Maybe you should've figured out that an imposter
uses my identity before you made accusations
that resulted in actual physical injuries to
someone innocent.

---
Mark4

ANSWER THE PHONE PHIL. We need to arrest you.

Then you are going to be sued, and lose everything
you have. Yeah, you messed up.

---
Mark

I think we all know by now, that the name and address provided to me as the
true identity of Ari, is yet another goose chase. If this was indeed
accurate information, I don't think he would continue to flaunt you as he is
doing. I, and I know many others, would like nothing more than to uncover
his true identity. For example, I have a business attorney who would just
love to take this on. And someday he may very well do so.

I told no lies you need to read your emails better.
I don't need your non help eiher.

Mark IV

On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:35:02 -0800, John Sisker wrote:

"Phil" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:21:32 -0800 (PST), Mark4 wrote:

On Nov 22, 8:04 pm, Mark4 wrote:
You will be getting a visit tommorow.

You messed up big time.

Maybe you should've figured out that an imposter
uses my identity before you made accusations
that resulted in actual physical injuries to
someone innocent.

---
Mark4

ANSWER THE PHONE PHIL. We need to arrest you.

Then you are going to be sued, and lose everything
you have. Yeah, you messed up.

---
Mark

I think we all know by now, that the name and address provided to me as the
true identity of Ari, is yet another goose chase. If this was indeed
accurate information, I don't think he would continue to flaunt you as he is
doing. I, and I know many others, would like nothing more than to uncover
his true identity. For example, I have a business attorney who would just
love to take this on. And someday he may very well do so.

I told no lies you need to read your emails better.
I don't need your non help eiher.

Mark IV

On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 17:11:42 -0500, Phil
wrote:

On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:33:42 -0800 (PST), george wrote:

On Dec 2, 11:02*am, Phil wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:17:07 -0500, Kurt Ullman wrote:
In article ,
*Phil wrote:

Phil

Mark, could we set an appointment time for my incarceration. I am
available at 1400, 3Dec10, will that work?

Phil

* * Could you do it around 4:30 or so? I'm busy at 2:00 and wouldn't
want to miss the perp walk.

Fine with me as long as I get a firm time.

Mark4 - 1630 OK?

Phil

I hate to say it but it appears that mark4 is full of ****.
All those threats and nothing ?

Please, don't rile him. He's serious.

Phil Lip


If everyone in rec.aviation.piloting,misc.writing and sci.physics
complains to Eternal September about all the unnecessary cross posting
then perhaps we can get the IP this fellow is posting from. If it is
Ari, then we can trace him.

On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:14:44 -0600, nfw wrote:

On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 17:11:42 -0500, Phil
wrote:

On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:33:42 -0800 (PST), george wrote:

On Dec 2, 11:02*am, Phil wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:17:07 -0500, Kurt Ullman wrote:
In article ,
*Phil wrote:

Phil

Mark, could we set an appointment time for my incarceration. I am
available at 1400, 3Dec10, will that work?

Phil

* * Could you do it around 4:30 or so? I'm busy at 2:00 and wouldn't
want to miss the perp walk.

Fine with me as long as I get a firm time.

Mark4 - 1630 OK?

Phil

I hate to say it but it appears that mark4 is full of ****.
All those threats and nothing ?

Please, don't rile him. He's serious.

Phil Lip

If everyone in rec.aviation.piloting,misc.writing and sci.physics
complains to Eternal September about all the unnecessary cross posting
then perhaps we can get the IP this fellow is posting from. If it is
Ari, then we can trace him.

Good idea, get right on that.

*LOL
--
Ari Silverstein, C.T.A; C.T.A.S, FREE Cruise Travel Advisory Services
I never have nor ever will solicit or accept a booking.

On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 17:10:42 -0800, John Sisker wrote:

"Mark IV" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:35:02 -0800, John Sisker wrote:

"Phil" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:21:32 -0800 (PST), Mark4 wrote:

On Nov 22, 8:04 pm, Mark4 wrote:
You will be getting a visit tommorow.

You messed up big time.

Maybe you should've figured out that an imposter
uses my identity before you made accusations
that resulted in actual physical injuries to
someone innocent.

---
Mark4

ANSWER THE PHONE PHIL. We need to arrest you.

Then you are going to be sued, and lose everything
you have. Yeah, you messed up.

---
Mark

I think we all know by now, that the name and address provided to me as
the
true identity of Ari, is yet another goose chase. If this was indeed
accurate information, I don't think he would continue to flaunt you as he
is
doing. I, and I know many others, would like nothing more than to uncover
his true identity. For example, I have a business attorney who would just
love to take this on. And someday he may very well do so.

I told no lies you need to read your emails better.
I don't need your non help eiher.

Mark IV

Sorry that I apparently stepped on your toes; this was not meant to. Yet, as
I said before, the information provided to me as to the true identify of
Ari, needs to be confirmed and verified before it can be acted up. I
certainly don't have the time or money to send our attorney out on another
wild goose chase. No confirmation was ever forthcoming, so what is one to
think?

I said, read your email, it is verified and I
intend to move on it with or withoput you. Sorry
you lost your courage.

In addition, I'm glad you don't need my help, or apparently anyone else's,
for if that was the case, why supply all this information for others to act
upon, but not do it yourself? Believe me, with conformation and verification
as to the correct contact, I personally have more than enough information to
legally proceed.

Then you don't need me. I don't need cowards.
Good luck, you will need it.

Mark IV
--
https://twitter.com/CorruptNutsac
http://gayincarolina.jottit.com/my_main_squeeze