A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AOPA Flight Planner - I preferred the earlier one



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 19th 04, 11:40 AM
Maule Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AOPA Flight Planner - I preferred the earlier one

I preferred the earlier one because it was web based and allowed me to run
it wherever I was on whoever's system I was using (including my friend's
Macs where I've planned and filed dozens of flights).

What really is irritating me is the fact that my home 'port, 8NC8, is not in
the airport database. Making it a waypoint still doesn't seem to allow me
plan a flight to and from it. A minor but irritating problem. It wasn't a
problem with the earlier tool.

Going to have to call them since there doesn't seem to be any online help or
support on the topic.


  #2  
Old March 19th 04, 03:50 PM
Ross Richardson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I called AOPA to inquire about the fact the Flight Planner didn't allow
a user defined route; it's direct or airways. They said they had to keep
it simple. You can go and strech the rubber band route.

You know, for simple flight planning, the DUATS Cirrus dial-up
application cannot be beat. Gives you interface with DUATs winds, can
plan airways, direct, user defined. I have my plane profiled and I
usually am within 5 to 10 minutes of my flight time and a couple of
gallons of fuel burn. I get a real simple printable flight plan to take
away with me.

Ross
N7905U

Maule Driver wrote:

I preferred the earlier one because it was web based and allowed me to run
it wherever I was on whoever's system I was using (including my friend's
Macs where I've planned and filed dozens of flights).

What really is irritating me is the fact that my home 'port, 8NC8, is not in
the airport database. Making it a waypoint still doesn't seem to allow me
plan a flight to and from it. A minor but irritating problem. It wasn't a
problem with the earlier tool.

Going to have to call them since there doesn't seem to be any online help or
support on the topic.

  #3  
Old March 19th 04, 04:08 PM
Kyler Laird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Maule Driver" writes:

I preferred the earlier one because it was web based and allowed me to run
it wherever I was on whoever's system I was using (including my friend's
Macs where I've planned and filed dozens of flights).


I flight plan on whatever machine I have handy. Often is borrowed.

It continues to amaze me that companies try *so* hard to avoid making
applications that just work on the Web.

What really is irritating me is the fact that my home 'port, 8NC8, is not in
the airport database. Making it a waypoint still doesn't seem to allow me
plan a flight to and from it.


From the related thread, I gather this means that AOPA assumes that only
a small fraction of their members would ever want to use that airport so
it's not worth spending resources to support it.

--kyler
  #4  
Old March 19th 04, 04:32 PM
Andrew Gideon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kyler Laird wrote:


From the related thread, I gather this means that AOPA assumes that only
a small fraction of their members would ever want to use that airport so
it's not worth spending resources to support it.


Laugh

Uh oh. A small fraction of AOPA members use any airport.

- Andrew

  #5  
Old March 19th 04, 04:34 PM
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a previous article, "Maule Driver" said:
I preferred the earlier one because it was web based and allowed me to run
it wherever I was on whoever's system I was using (including my friend's
Macs where I've planned and filed dozens of flights).


Isn't the old AOPA one just http://www.duats.com/ with the AOPA name
plastered on it?

What really is irritating me is the fact that my home 'port, 8NC8, is not in
the airport database. Making it a waypoint still doesn't seem to allow me


It's on duats.com.


--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
Microsoft - Where quality is job 1.0.1
  #6  
Old March 19th 04, 09:13 PM
John Harlow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What really is irritating me is the fact that my home 'port, 8NC8, is
not in the airport database. Making it a waypoint still doesn't seem
to allow me plan a flight to and from it. A minor but irritating
problem.


I see it more of as a major flaw. It's a pretty useless tool to me.


  #7  
Old March 19th 04, 10:53 PM
Maule Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Paul Tomblin"
In a previous article, "Maule Driver"

said:
I preferred the earlier one because it was web based and allowed me to

run
it wherever I was on whoever's system I was using (including my friend's
Macs where I've planned and filed dozens of flights).


Isn't the old AOPA one just http://www.duats.com/ with the AOPA name
plastered on it?

What really is irritating me is the fact that my home 'port, 8NC8, is not

in
the airport database. Making it a waypoint still doesn't seem to allow

me

It's on duats.com.

You are right. It was just duats.com with AOPA on it. I think I'll go back
to it. The 8nc8 omission is a real pain.

AOPA seems to be paying a lot of attention to the airspace restrictions so
maybe that's what it's good for.


  #8  
Old March 19th 04, 11:47 PM
Dean Wilkinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

********* Shameless Plug ************

While not free, my Win32 planner is low cost compared to the
competition and it includes digital sectionals. It will run on
any version of windows from 95 on, and can run under Virtual PC
on a Mac. It may run under WINE on a Linux machine. It was
developed using Delphi, and I can easily offer it in a .NET
version. Rumor has it that .NET will soon be supported on both
Linux and Mac machines.

Download the demo and give it a try:
http://www.razorsedgesoft.com/airplan

I will have a booth at Oshkosh this year, so stop by and see me
there.

Dean Wilkinson

"Maule Driver" wrote in message m...
I preferred the earlier one because it was web based and allowed me to run
it wherever I was on whoever's system I was using (including my friend's
Macs where I've planned and filed dozens of flights).

What really is irritating me is the fact that my home 'port, 8NC8, is not in
the airport database. Making it a waypoint still doesn't seem to allow me
plan a flight to and from it. A minor but irritating problem. It wasn't a
problem with the earlier tool.

Going to have to call them since there doesn't seem to be any online help or
support on the topic.

  #9  
Old March 20th 04, 12:23 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Kyler Laird wrote:

From the related thread, I gather this means that AOPA assumes that only
a small fraction of their members would ever want to use that airport so
it's not worth spending resources to support it.


I could be wrong, but I think you should blame Jeppesen, not AOPA. The download
page says that Jep provides the software.

George Patterson
Battle, n; A method of untying with the teeth a political knot that would
not yield to the tongue.
  #10  
Old March 20th 04, 01:45 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

AOPA's flight planner was introduced to give users better ability to plot
TFRs than what the old DUATS flight planner had. It was written by Jeppesen
and is the same software that the FAA uses to plot TFRs. It is based on
Jeppesen's FliteStar software and had the TFR plotting ability even before
FliteStar had it.

However, like all freeware, I suspect it is deliberately crippled so as to
not affect FliteStar's sales.

8NC8 is in the database for both FliteStar and the AOPA flight planner. For
some reason the AOPA flight planner will not let you use it, although you
can see it plotted on the chart if you zoom in enough. You can click on it
and get the information about it.

7 NM NE of Durham, NC (Durham County)

N 36° 03.6' W 78° 47.0' Magnetic Variation: 9.1°W

Elevation: 309'

Cincinnati Sectional

Owner: Private, Permitted Use: Private

Position Estimated, Elevation Surveyed


It looks like a bug (in the software -- the airport does not look like a
bug). There is no problem including it in FlightStar flight plans, so this
is a peculiarity of the crippled AOPA version. I kind of wonder if the AOPA
software treats all private airports like this? It will not allow WA96 (Port
Orchard, WA), either. Maybe the lawyers got hold of it and worried about
liability.

Several people have mentioned Cirrus flight planning software. Cirrus is
going away. A free standalone replacement called "Golden Eagle FlightPrep"
has been developed by the same people who developed Cirrus, but I could not
find on their web site what the operating requirements will be. It will be
formally introduced in April at Sun n Fun. Cirrus was not developed by
DUATS, but both Cirrus and Golden Eagle FlightPrep are promoted on the DUATS
web site.

An online version of FlightPrep is available by paid subscription. It will
run on either Mac or Windows environments. The Mac notice has a disclaimer
that says "check computer requirements," but they don't seem to have posted
anywhere what those computer requirements are. It looks like the online
version compares favorably with Aeroplanner. They give a discount to AOPA
members.

www.flightprep.com



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
new theory of flight released Sept 2004 Mark Oliver Aerobatics 1 October 5th 04 10:20 PM
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP vvcd Home Built 0 September 22nd 04 07:16 PM
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots [email protected] Owning 9 April 1st 04 02:54 AM
AOPA and ATC Privatization Chip Jones Piloting 133 November 12th 03 08:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.