A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is Rafale dead?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old December 15th 03, 08:08 AM
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Those aditionnal 100 are not so speculative.


"Thomas Schoene" a écrit dans le message de
news: . ..
Skysurfer wrote:
Charles Talleyrand wrote :

I understand that the order to Dassault is for 28 aircraft, with
an option of 20 more. However, I have read on the web that
Dassault is to deliver 1 Rafale this year, and only 4 next year.
I have also read that there are only 13 operational Rafales with
the French Military.


I think the french govt has ordered about 300 Rafale.


Well, it has announced plans to order this many. However, actual orders

are
120 thus far, plus 76 fairly firm projected orders in the 2003-08 budget
plan, for a total of about 200. The additional 100 will come after 2008,
and are obviously rather speculative.

http://www.awgnet.com/shownews/03paris/topstor02.htm


--
Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail
"If brave men and women never died, there would be nothing
special about bravery." -- Andy Rooney (attributed)






  #22  
Old December 15th 03, 08:12 AM
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Is F.22 dead?If you're not american,no one cares...
Is "Dreamliner" (pfff!what a name!) dead?If you'are not american,no one
cares...
Is LCA dead?If you're not indian,no one cares....
Is Su.35 dead,if you're not russian,no one cares...

With such a logic,why not to make a newsgroup for each country,where one can
speak about planes from its own country,and only about those...




"J" a écrit dans le message de news:
. ..
If your not french, no one cares.




  #23  
Old December 15th 03, 10:40 AM
Lyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:09:36 -0500, "Tony Volk"
wrote:

I'll probably regret getting dragged into this, but it smacks me as very
hypocritical for a U.S. citizens to question an ally for not jumping into
any war they wanted. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the U.S. dragged their
feet for a relatively long time to officially defend "peace, freedom, etc."
when they were threatened as never before or since (W.W.II). It wasn't
until their own country was attacked that they officially entered the war.
I am aware of their other efforts before that, but no real commitment of
troops was provided. Heck, the whole western world pretty much stood by and
did nothing as Czechoslovakia was annexed. I'm not anti-American, but I
think that before you throw stones, you might want to look around to see how
much glass is in your house. Regards,


Remember the Monroe Doctorine. its for this reason that the US didnt
get involved. If Germany would have invaded a country in the western
hemisphere that would have been a differnet matter. Let Europe worry
about Europe was the motto of the day, for it was a foreign war.
But when we were attacked it no longer became a foreign war.
P.S. there was no western world or eastern world, only western
hemisphere(new world) and eastern hemisphere(old world). West and east
didnt come into play until the cold war. And the US wanted to keep the
war, and Europe out of the New World, therefore we didnt step in
theirs.
P.P.S Britian and France combined had a bigger military then Germany
all the way to the start of WW2. They could have stopped Hitler in
'36. But they suffered from the Peace at all Cost sickness.

Tony

Peace, freedom, etc. Those things that the French have never been
able to defend.

Al Minyard



  #24  
Old December 15th 03, 03:09 PM
Tony Volk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Remember the Monroe Doctorine. its for this reason that the US didnt
get involved. If Germany would have invaded a country in the western
hemisphere that would have been a differnet matter. Let Europe worry
about Europe was the motto of the day, for it was a foreign war.
But when we were attacked it no longer became a foreign war.
P.S. there was no western world or eastern world, only western
hemisphere(new world) and eastern hemisphere(old world). West and east
didnt come into play until the cold war. And the US wanted to keep the
war, and Europe out of the New World, therefore we didnt step in
theirs.


I'm not sure if this is an argument, or an agreement that France (now)
acted very much like the U.S. (then). It sure seems to back up what I said
before. Thanks for the details. Cheers,

Tony


  #25  
Old December 15th 03, 04:54 PM
pcg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Sure, they plan to ramp up production. But their original plans never

said
18 aircraft in 8 years, so I have doubts about the current plans to. Can
anyone comment on this?


Production line is ready to assemble about 10 aircrafts a year, but Dassault
respects the gov plan by staging costs (hence the higher costs per
aircraft... : a traditional french budget problem....) : it's only a defense
budget issue.

On this page you can see the deliveries calendar to the French Navy :
http://frenchnavy.free.fr/aircraft/rafale/rafale_fr.htm
("Calendrier des livraisons (1999-2012)")


  #26  
Old December 15th 03, 08:34 PM
WaltBJ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

IS the Rafale dead? Nobody answered the question.
BTW the US armed forces, with the exception of the Navy, didn't have
anything to fight with in 1941, let alone 1939. Look it up.
Walt BJ
  #27  
Old December 15th 03, 09:54 PM
Franck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

great explication Tony

but don't try to explain anythinq to this Al, He can't understand anything.
Just Black & White, good & bad and all US way are good

Best regards

--
Franck

www.pegase-airshow.com
www.picavia.com


  #28  
Old December 15th 03, 11:34 PM
Bill Kambic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Most of the "wise cracks" about the U.S. position vis-a-vis the world in the
late '30s demonstrate a remarkable combination of arrogance and ignorance.

For most American opinion makers the experiences of U.S. participation in
WWI were less than satisfactory. The monumental ineptitude of French and
British commanders was memorialized in a series of post-War flicks (such as
"All Quiet on the Western Front"). The writing of men like Hemmingway had
stripped the glory from war. The general attitude was if the foolish
Europeans want to slaughter each other in vast numbers, God bless 'em.

It was clear to the U.S. administration that war in Europe was inevitable
and that U.S. interests would demand U.S. participation. Given the general
population's feelings, any governmental action (particularly during
Depression era times) had to be considered.

Actions there were. In fact, every major U.S. combat aircraft of WWII was
conceived and the prototypes at least on the drawing board by the end of
1940. That year also saw the passage of the first peacetime draft in U.S.
history, the Two Ocean Navy Act, and Lend-Lease. A very late start in the
deveopment of armored vehicles and doctrine was being addressed. The
foundations of the Arsenal of Democracy were being laid.

The Japanese ended American political divisions on "the war question."

Bill Kambic

If, by any act, error, or omission, I have, intentionally or
unintentionally, displayed any breedist, disciplinist, sexist, racist,
culturalist, nationalist, regionalist, localist, ageist, lookist, ableist,
sizeist, speciesist, intellectualist, socioeconomicist, ethnocentrist,
phallocentrist, heteropatriarchalist, or other violation of the rules of
political correctness, known or unknown, I am not sorry and I encourage you
to get over it.

"WaltBJ" wrote in message
om...
IS the Rafale dead? Nobody answered the question.
BTW the US armed forces, with the exception of the Navy, didn't have
anything to fight with in 1941, let alone 1939. Look it up.
Walt BJ



  #29  
Old December 16th 03, 12:12 AM
Paul F Austin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"WaltBJ" wrote
IS the Rafale dead? Nobody answered the question.
BTW the US armed forces, with the exception of the Navy, didn't have
anything to fight with in 1941, let alone 1939. Look it up.


It's not dead but it is very ill, for lack of foreign military sales. France
alone can't manage Rafale procurement at a rate that would give them a
viable force in reasonable time, not when she is funding the A400M, a new
carrier, procurement of the fourth Triomphant.. All those things are also in
competition with social security funding as the French population ages.


  #30  
Old December 16th 03, 12:39 AM
Tony Volk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

True. On the other hand the US Congress actually refused to
sell weapons to Britain and France at a very critical moment.


With this timely bit of information, I'm going to thank Emmanuel for
reminding us what this thread was about and leave my comments to stand as
they are. This isn't alt.political.historical.contemporary.war.morals, and
I'm certainly not an expert on such. Thanks for the details on the Rafale
Emmanuel,

Tony


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bud Dake dead in crash Orval Fairbairn Home Built 3 June 23rd 04 04:32 AM
Bronze Star to four dead Canadians George Z. Bush Military Aviation 10 December 10th 03 03:03 PM
At Dover, New Facility To Receive The Dead Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 October 29th 03 03:26 AM
Air Force wife, kids found dead Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 July 19th 03 04:36 AM
Dead F-111 Pilot was only a passenger Vector Military Aviation 3 July 8th 03 01:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.