If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Libelle suitability for beginners
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Libelle suitability for beginners
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Libelle suitability for beginners
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Libelle suitability for beginners
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 00:00:27 +0000, Martin Gregorie wrote:
Not quite: 201s were entirely balsa until s/n 110 (mine is 82). The transition from the all-balsa 201 with no water and both-surface airbrakes to the 201B with all-foam surfaces, top-surface airbrakes and water bags as standard started with s/n 111 and was complete at s/n 182. I should have added a warning I was given about 201s with double surface brakes: If you're forced to land out on long, thick grass or crop, try to put the brakes away just before dropping into the long stuff or you may find the lower brakes severely bent, though I suspect that remembering to do this may be a stretch and this may make getting it into the trailer 'interesting'. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Libelle suitability for beginners
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 01:13:34 -0800, son_of_flubber wrote:
At 170 pounds with chute, I've never had any bouncing or kiting problems with the Junior trimmed for 60 knots during takeoff. In the Junior I fly that is notch 4/10, with 1/10 being full aft trim. YMMV, but I don't think that it is at all fair to suggest that the Junior is prone to PIO on takeoff. I'm 56kg without a 'chute and use notch 7/10 for both take-off and landing - thats 55 kts - in calm conditions. Works for both aero tow and winch. We're taught "55kts + half windspeed for approach" and, yes I have used a 70kt approach in a Junior on a rather lively day - and had the base leg quite close to the threshhold! Its also worth noticing the fixed trim tabs on the elevator. AFAICT they don't do anything much under 70 kts, but are there to 'hint' to a new solo pilot that he maybe doesn't want to fly as fast as he's going - by the time you get to 90kts in a Junior the stick is pushing back at you quite hard. Vne is 116kts. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Libelle suitability for beginners
On Saturday, February 15, 2020 at 2:44:57 PM UTC-5, son_of_flubber wrote:
Another 'Club Class' glider to consider is the SZD 51-1. The Junior is benign, built to sustain hard landings, has very effective airbrakes, it slips, PU painted at the factory (no gel coat liability), fun to fly well-harmonized controls, and designed from the ground up to be a single seat trainer. Limited aerobatics permitted. Things that may or may not matter are 1)it has a somewhat upright seating position, so pilots with long trunks may not have enough head height. 2)a wing dolly is recommended. Of the 261 built, there are only 7 Juniors in the USA, and 4 are club owned. So Juniors are rarely offered for sale. Why are you discussing the Junior when the topic is specifically about the Std Libelle? UH |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Libelle suitability for beginners
On Sunday, February 16, 2020 at 3:30:06 AM UTC-7, Paul T wrote:
"Not recommended for inexperienced pilots (from Gliding Safety - by Derek Piggott) The Libelle The beauty of the Libelle is the light weight of the wings and the ease of rigging and derigging. However, it is not for you unless you have already made a few field landings and are an above-average pilot. Although it is nice and easy to fly, the airbrakes are ineffective compared with those on most other machines-an extra 5 knots on the approach and you will be in the far hedge or the next field! Because of these airbrakes, you must be able to side-slip quickly and accurately while using full airbrake on the final approach. With less experienced pilots, it is inevitable that the occasional approach will end up a little high or fast, and only a quick side-slip can prevent an overshoot and an expensive accident. The Libelle suffers a serious loss of performance and buffets badly unless it is flown accurately. This is probably due to the sharply pointed top of the fuselage which causes a breakaway of the airflow if the glider is flown with the slightest slip or skid. Having a short, stubby fin and rudder, the Libelle is also not as directionally stable as later machines, and this makes it more difficult to fly accurately than most other types. In the air it is docile and pleasant to fly, but the poor airbrakes make it unsuitable for an inexperienced pilot. Larger pilots may find the cockpit avery snug fit, as the top is rather narrow." Many years ago there was a Libelle 201(b?) at the RAFGSA Centre when it was located at RAF Bicester. It was purchased by the Nuffield Trust and also had a plaque stating 150hrs P1 required. Just an observation. Frank Whiteley |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Libelle suitability for beginners
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 04:08:09 -0800, Frank Whiteley wrote:
Many years ago there was a Libelle 201(b?) at the RAFGSA Centre when it was located at RAF Bicester. It was purchased by the Nuffield Trust and also had a plaque stating 150hrs P1 required. The GSA bought two 201s, built in 1969, arrived in UK 1970. One was flown in the Marfa WGC. I own the other one. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Libelle suitability for beginners
On Sunday, 16 February 2020 12:30:04 UTC+2, Paul T wrote:
"Gliding Safety" by Derek Piggott, A&C Black (1991) page 109. Std Libelle not recommended for "inexperienced pilots", e.g., unless you've already made a few field landings and are an "above average" pilot. I would recommend Std.Libelle to any inexperienced pilot. Just fly it close to the airfield for few dozen hours, practice side slip and short landings.. Then you are not inexperienced anymore. The glider itself is pleasant to fly and not dangerous at all. Most glass ship from 60's had weak airbrakes, you learn to adjust your landing pattern accordingly after few flights. I dont understand what's the deal with avoiding some types because you can not do anything you want right away without any training or practise. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Libelle suitability for beginners
The Libelle is a true "classic" glider.
The only negative I was told is a weak boom subseptible to damage during off field landings if the glider drags a wingtip and gets sideways. Had that happen to one at our field. Any truth to that? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Std. Libelle vs Club Libelle | [email protected] | Soaring | 10 | August 21st 19 01:00 AM |
Libelle | Ross[_3_] | Soaring | 38 | August 13th 18 08:23 PM |
Libelle 201 canopy | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | July 4th 16 02:03 PM |
Beginners? | vic20owner | Soaring | 4 | April 28th 09 07:57 PM |
Suitability of Proven Technologies for Defending Against Airborne Terrorism | Yossarian | Military Aviation | 13 | January 8th 04 03:30 AM |