If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
"Ace" wrote in message news On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:45:21 GMT, "Brooks Gregory" wrote: Go find yourself a playmate kid. I was in the political arena way too long to play your games. The truth is too painful to admit. I see. Yea, if that works, take it. PLONK |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:24:01 +0000, WalterM140 wrote:
[snip] So do flying officers in the US Air Force go through six weeks of training -- as enlisted men -- and then are commissioned as officers? What part of Ed Rasimus' explanation did you not understand? And what was common 30 years ago is probably not so today. The reason for that is pretty clear. Bush skipped out on the last two years of his commitment. No he did not. This too has been explained in detail by those who have some chance of getting it right. IBM __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Ace:
Do your homework. Fact- not opinion, fact- is that eht so-called "popular vote" was undecided. A statistical tie, more accurately. We will *never* know who actually received the most votes, because: 1) Not all votes were counted. It's legal in most places to discard votes if they won't tip the electoral scales. Therefore, in the "Bush" states many Gore votes (and potential additional Bush votes) were discarded, and vice versa. 2) Out of the votes that *were* counted, the totals were within the margin of errors of the mechanical counting systems used. Even with "perfectly" filled out ballots, the machine counters have margins of error (within a 95% confidence interval) of ~3% of total votes cast. Basically, any vote tally within 6% of each other is at least 5% chance we gave the win to the wrong guy . . . as teh tallies get closer, the probability of error gets higher. 3) *Now* you may apply whatever sense of the typical "irregularites" (10,000 absentee ballots discarded in Florida) you feel exist, and hte margins are even higher. STOP REPEATING HTE "GORE WON POPULAR ELECTION" BULL****! You are no longer ignorant- if you repeat this lie, you are evil. Steve Swartz "Ace" wrote in message ... On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:47:07 GMT, "Brooks Gregory" wrote: Is it following the law to vote along partisan lines? Or do you think that was pure coincidence? Go play with your chads. Chicago and New York screwed-up by trying to trust the Cubans to elect them. The Cubans don't like Gore. They don't like Kerry either. The Democrats have missed the boat down there since 1963. Who won the popular vote? Who won the Grammy? I see. When you find an uncomfortable question you answer with a different question. I'll give you a hint. George Bush wasn't the winner. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
You are one ignorant- or evil- SOB, Ace.
Steve Swartz "Ace" wrote in message ... On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:25:13 GMT, "Brooks Gregory" wrote: The truth is too painful to admit. I see. Yea, if that works, take it. PLONK Another one bites the dust!!! |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
"Ace" wrote
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 01:24:12 -0500, "D. Strang" "Ace" wrote Is it following the law to vote along partisan lines? Or do you think that was pure coincidence? Go play with your chads. Chicago and New York screwed-up by trying to trust the Cubans to elect them. The Cubans don't like Gore. They don't like Kerry either. The Democrats have missed the boat down there since 1963. Who won the popular vote? Who cares. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
WalterM140 wrote:
He didn't go to officer candidate school because the Air National Guard doesn't have one. You have been told that repeatedly but keep repeating the same old tired lies even when you know they are lies. Someone -- I didn't keep track -- said that Bush DID go to OTS. When I asked if OTS attendees were considered to be enlisted men, I got nothing back. Personnel attending officer training programs typically do have enlisted rank, even if only for administrative purposes (IIRC, I was an E-2 while in ROTC in college, although the closest I ever came to wearing a uniform with enlisted rank were the cadet ranks during my first two years of ROTC). Several enlisted troops in my group have been selected for OTS, and will maintain their enlisted rank until completion of training, at which time they will be discharged from enlisted service and then sworn in as 2Lt's. Mike Williamson |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Ace wrote: On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:47:07 GMT, "Brooks Gregory" wrote: Is it following the law to vote along partisan lines? Or do you think that was pure coincidence? Go play with your chads. Chicago and New York screwed-up by trying to trust the Cubans to elect them. The Cubans don't like Gore. They don't like Kerry either. The Democrats have missed the boat down there since 1963. Who won the popular vote? Who won the Grammy? I see. When you find an uncomfortable question you answer with a different question. I'll give you a hint. George Bush wasn't the winner. According to the Constitution, he was. You've heard of the document, I suspect. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
George Z. Bush wrote:
That does not change a thing. Whether or not you agree, the ANG is NOT a part of the active establishment until it is federalized and activated. Until that time, they answer to their governors only, regardless of where the money for their operations comes from. Not strictly true- they follow the appropriate Regulations or Instructions appropriate to their service and operational requirements. In the Air Force these would be all of the appropriate Air Force Instructions (AFIs). In addition, they are inspected and evaluated under a program which includes Guard and Reserve representation, but they are inspected under the same standards as active duty units and their inspection teams will have both active and non-active members. Mike |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Ace wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:47:07 GMT, "Brooks Gregory" wrote: Is it following the law to vote along partisan lines? Or do you think that was pure coincidence? Go play with your chads. Chicago and New York screwed-up by trying to trust the Cubans to elect them. The Cubans don't like Gore. They don't like Kerry either. The Democrats have missed the boat down there since 1963. Who won the popular vote? Who won the Grammy? I see. When you find an uncomfortable question you answer with a different question. I'll give you a hint. George Bush wasn't the winner. In point of fact, no one won a majority of the popular vote, nor did they in the previous presidential election. But neither of those tidbits are relevant to the discussion, as the President of the United States has never been elected via a popular vote. The number of people in the news (including, IIRC, Chelsea Clinton) who expressed surprise and dismay at this fact should be made to retake high school civics. As should those who still seem to cling to it as though it does, or ever did, have some relevance. If you want a leader elected through direct popular vote, move to -- hmm, having a hard time finding one. Even Castro was listed as being elected via "legislative vote." Mike |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Steve Hix wrote in
: In article , Ace wrote: On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:47:07 GMT, "Brooks Gregory" wrote: [snip I'll give you a hint. George Bush wasn't the winner. According to the Constitution, he was. You've heard of the document, I suspect. Hmmm, might be an unsafe bet on this occasion. IBM __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Highest-Ranking Black Air Force General Credits Success to Hard Work | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | February 10th 04 11:06 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Air Force announces acquisition management reorganization | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 21st 03 09:16 PM |