If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Corvair conversion engines
Cal, the statement I was responding to was from the guy who said that auto engines end up essentially costing as much as an aircraft engine. I was posting my actual costs to suggest that the costs are, or can be, very much lower for the auto engine conversion than for a rebuilt aircraft engine. But I chose to do all the work, except for the machining of the engine parts, myself. If you do not wish to put in that kind of time, or do not have the knowledge to do so, then the options tend to be a lot more expensive. Buying a firewall forward package and simply bolting it in place and connecting the wires and fuel lines will of course cost a bunch more than doing everything yourself. Perhaps this is what that gentleman was talking about. Corky Scott Corky, could you tell us how successfull you were with your Ford engine. Curious Jean-Paul |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Corvair conversion engines
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 09:44:18 -0500, "Jean-Paul Roy"
wrote: Corky, could you tell us how successfull you were with your Ford engine. Curious Jean-Paul Successful in what sense? I got it running and was just beginning my testing of the engine when I had a kind of revelation, and sold everything, and all aviation related tools and building materials I'd accumulated. The only real reason I was building the airplane was so that my wife and I could, upon retiring, tour the area and the US at our leasure. But she just can't fly for long without experiencing lots of pain from the lowered pressure on her ears. Not to mention her tendency towards air sickness. I was at a point where the next steps in the construction would have been pretty expensive. I had to blast and paint the fuselage, wire it and cover it. I then had to buy and install all the necessary instruments and deal with the cooling system for the engine. Then I had to paint the fabric. I figured that I still had another $5,000 to $10,000 I could put into it before it was ready to fly. Plus, then I'd need hangar $space and in$surance. All for an airplane I'd be mostly flying by myself, to take me to various $100 hamburger destinations, once in a while when the weather was nice. It just didn't seem worth it, so I sold everything last summer. The engine went to a builder of a Bearhawk, the fuselage/wings went to an A&P from Florida, a guy who wanted something he felt was mostly already constructed as he's 65. So everything went to a good home. I can't stand not building something though so I'm back at it, but in a different venue: I'm building a cedar strip canoe. My wife and I got out on the Connecticut River last summer in a friends beater canoe and she powerfully pulled her weight paddling all day. Her comment was "I can do this," and "we could bring the dogs too". We have two dogs who don't like being left alone. Additionally, paddling canoes means you aren't burning fossile fuels for your entertainment, although you do burn some getting to where you put in. Once that's built, I'm looking at building a smallish day sailer. So in terms of building something, I'm having a good time. I'm also turning to woodworking to work on the house. One of the big pluses is that I get to buy new machines, heh heh. Corky Scott |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Corvair conversion engines
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Corvair conversion engines - cracked crank link
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 19:17:35 -0600, Cal Vanize
wrote: Richard Lamb wrote: Cal Vanize wrote: The issue us addressed in this page: http://www.flycorvair.com/crankissues.html The date on the page is 15 January 2006 - just released information. Ron Webb wrote: Do you have a link for the broken cranks? I cannot find anything about broken cranks on the "Corvair authority" site. http://www.flycorvair.com/ I did find the following statement: "I have never seen a cracked head, cylinder, case, crank or rod in the hundreds of Corvair engines I have inspected. It is a very strong engine." The Corvair engine has been flying since the early 1960's. Seems odd that ANY flaw would only now be being discovered. that dose seem like a lot of broken cranks... Three out of five cranks cracked. All with 200 or less hours. That's a small sampling, but not very good results. The article does indicate that the cranks were from engines in planes that were flying. That's the good news. But does that also mean that the engines need a teardown and inspection as part of every oil change? These were also 40 year old cranks of unknown provenence, pulled out of old car engines that may have been thrashed to within an inch of their lives in previous "inCARnations" |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Corvair conversion engines - cracked crank link
---------much snipped-----------
These were also 40 year old cranks of unknown provenence, pulled out of old car engines that may have been thrashed to within an inch of their lives in previous "inCARnations" This has been my area of concern as well. I would really find these engines more attractive if I was confident that a complete new engine could be built. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Corvair conversion engines - cracked crank link
"Peter Dohm" wrote in message
news ---------much snipped----------- These were also 40 year old cranks of unknown provenence, pulled out of old car engines that may have been thrashed to within an inch of their lives in previous "inCARnations" This has been my area of concern as well. I would really find these engines more attractive if I was confident that a complete new engine could be built. New engines don't have crankshaft problems? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Rich S. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Corvair conversion engines - cracked crank link
"Rich S." wrote in message ... "Peter Dohm" wrote in message news ---------much snipped----------- These were also 40 year old cranks of unknown provenence, pulled out of old car engines that may have been thrashed to within an inch of their lives in previous "inCARnations" This has been my area of concern as well. I would really find these engines more attractive if I was confident that a complete new engine could be built. New engines don't have crankshaft problems? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Rich S. Yes. I know that they do, and new design engines are notorious; as are design improvements, changes of supplier, etc. And they include plenty of reasons for loss of power not caused by the crankshaft! However, my concerns include, reliability, maintainability, and eventual replacement; and I think you understand my point. At this point, the Jabiru 3300 is the only engine that really looks to me like a promising replacement; and I really don't know its service record. However, albeit at a higher dollar price, its features seem to preserve: 1) similar or lighter weight, 2) similar or higher power, 3) six cylinder smoothness, 4) reasonably slow idle, and 5) similar dimmensions. Additional benefits are designed in dual ignition and an updraft intake system, similar to Lycoming and Continental, which should be more resistant to ice. Peter |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Corvair conversion engines - cracked crank link
"Peter Dohm" wrote in message
... Yes. I know that they do, and new design engines are notorious; as are design improvements, changes of supplier, etc. And they include plenty of reasons for loss of power not caused by the crankshaft! However, my concerns include, reliability, maintainability, and eventual replacement; and I think you understand my point. At this point, the Jabiru 3300 is the only engine that really looks to me like a promising replacement; and I really don't know its service record. However, albeit at a higher dollar price, its features seem to preserve: 1) similar or lighter weight, 2) similar or higher power, 3) six cylinder smoothness, 4) reasonably slow idle, and 5) similar dimmensions. Additional benefits are designed in dual ignition and an updraft intake system, similar to Lycoming and Continental, which should be more resistant to ice. Peter.......... Since you answered seriously, I will too. I can agree on the higher price and on #1-3 and #5. I don't understand #4 - do Corvairs idle unreasonably high? The dual ignition is good if the Jabiru 3300 truly has two stand-alone systems. The intake direction is irrelevant if the Corvair is fuel-injected or has a heated intake manifold. Updraft carbs are a lot better at preventing fire as well. The small Continentals will ice up if you look at them cross-eyed even with updraft intake. Rich S. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Corvair conversion engines - cracked crank link
In article , "Peter Dohm" wrote:
At this point, the Jabiru 3300 is the only engine that really looks to me like a promising replacement; and I really don't know its service record. However, albeit at a higher dollar price, its features seem to preserve: 1) similar or lighter weight, 2) similar or higher power, 3) six cylinder smoothness, 4) reasonably slow idle, and 5) similar dimmensions. Additional benefits are designed in dual ignition and an updraft intake system, similar to Lycoming and Continental, which should be more resistant to ice. Peter Why would an updraft intake system be more resistant to ice? Heat rises, so I would expect a downdraft system, mounted above the engine block, to be more resistant to icing. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Corvair conversion engines - cracked crank link
"Rich S." wrote in message . .. "Peter Dohm" wrote in message ... Yes. I know that they do, and new design engines are notorious; as are design improvements, changes of supplier, etc. And they include plenty of reasons for loss of power not caused by the crankshaft! However, my concerns include, reliability, maintainability, and eventual replacement; and I think you understand my point. At this point, the Jabiru 3300 is the only engine that really looks to me like a promising replacement; and I really don't know its service record. However, albeit at a higher dollar price, its features seem to preserve: 1) similar or lighter weight, 2) similar or higher power, 3) six cylinder smoothness, 4) reasonably slow idle, and 5) similar dimmensions. Additional benefits are designed in dual ignition and an updraft intake system, similar to Lycoming and Continental, which should be more resistant to ice. Peter.......... Since you answered seriously, I will too. I can agree on the higher price and on #1-3 and #5. I don't understand #4 - do Corvairs idle unreasonably high? The dual ignition is good if the Jabiru 3300 truly has two stand-alone systems. The intake direction is irrelevant if the Corvair is fuel-injected or has a heated intake manifold. Updraft carbs are a lot better at preventing fire as well. The small Continentals will ice up if you look at them cross-eyed even with updraft intake. Rich S. The Corvairs have a very good idle. But the Rotax, which is one of the possible replacements I would include on my list, seems to have a minimum operating speed restriction. On a KR-2, which has no flaps, I suspect it would result in very flat final approaches. You are right about the small Contintals, time has gone by and I just plain forgot. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch | Paul | Home Built | 0 | October 18th 04 10:14 PM |
P-3C Ditches with Four Engines Out, All Survive! | Scet | Military Aviation | 6 | September 27th 04 01:09 AM |
What if the germans... | Charles Gray | Military Aviation | 119 | January 26th 04 11:20 PM |
Corvair Engine Conversion Breakin Success | Dick | Home Built | 1 | January 11th 04 02:06 PM |
Corvair Conversion | Gig Giacona | Home Built | 17 | October 27th 03 09:43 PM |