A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fed: Planes flying in "commercial" airspace must get GPS



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #32  
Old June 3rd 10, 11:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
a[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 562
Default Fed: Planes flying in "commercial" airspace must get GPS

On Jun 3, 12:22*am, "Stephen!" wrote:
a wrote in news:ad2f4ec2-e6ff-4630-a104-cc9246ac9f22
@j12g2000pri.googlegroups.com:



Recent studies of midair collisions involving aircraft by the National
Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) determined that:


* * Most of the aircraft involved in collisions are engaged in
recreational flying, not on any type of flight plan.


* * Most midair collisions occur in VFR weather conditions during
weekend daylight hours.


* * The vast majority of accidents occurred at or near uncontrolled
airports and at altitudes below 1000 feet.


* * Pilots of all experience levels were involved in midair
collisions, from pilots on their first solo ride, to 20,000-hour
veterans.


* * Flight instructors were on board the aircraft 37 percent of the
accidents in the study.


* * Most collisions occur in daylight with visibility greater than 3
miles.


Here's how you can contribute to professional flying and reduce the
odds of becoming involved in a midair collision.


* Lessee... *According to the "statistics", your best bet of successfully
accomplishing a flight without a mid-air collision is to: *Fly only at
night in low visibilty conditions, away from any airport, above 1000 feet,
with a flight instructor, and only during week days...

* Damn, how I love statistics.

--
RCOS #7
IBA# 11465http://imagesdesavions.com


On a personal note, I tend to feel 'safer' when the weather is worse
than marginal VFR and the kids (sorry for the demeaning phraseology)
stay on the ground. Paying attention to the information I offered may
cause some to choose to fly differently than the way they were taught
when around uncontrolled airports, or for that matter in other phases
of flight as well. I've learned from other posters here and
incorporated some of their ideas into my own flying, and made note of
my 'deviations' from standard techniques and think some pilots have
adopted some of them for their own use.

The sort of discussion about what might be safer flying is a worthy
use of RAP but the density of interesting information is pretty low.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
(USA) US/Mexico "airspace" (boundary) files available Tuno Soaring 4 March 27th 10 07:17 PM
some planes [11 of 11] "old-air-planes-crashed-underwater-photos-pictures.jpg" yEnc (1/1) No Name Aviation Photos 0 August 9th 09 09:36 PM
On Sharing airspace with "non-rated UAV "pilots" vaughn Piloting 15 March 15th 09 04:08 PM
"Fly Baby, you violated Class B Airspace" Ron Wanttaja Piloting 27 September 5th 07 08:30 PM
Aviation Conspiracy: Connecticut To Get "Creamed" By Airspace Redesign Change? Free Speaker General Aviation 0 August 8th 06 02:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.