A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

USS Ronald Reagan Question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 15th 03, 03:58 AM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default USS Ronald Reagan Question

Someone has posted some cool pix from the launch of the new super carrier
over on the binary channel (alt.binaries.pictures.aviation), which got me
wondering...

Is the new USS Ronald Reagan a *replacement* carrier? If so, which one is
being retired?

Or did we just add another battle group to the fleet?
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #2  
Old July 15th 03, 04:17 AM
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Is the new USS Ronald Reagan a *replacement* carrier? If so, which one is
being retired?


The Constellation.
It just returned from an extended tour due to the Afghanistan/Iraq
thing.
  #3  
Old July 15th 03, 04:44 AM
John Bell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The Constellation.
It just returned from an extended tour due to the Afghanistan/Iraq
thing.

The results of a little quick Googling:
http://www.navy.mil/homepages/cv64/noflash/home.htm

John Bell


  #4  
Old July 15th 03, 04:52 AM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The results of a little quick Googling:
http://www.navy.mil/homepages/cv64/noflash/home.htm


Thanks, John. Interesting that they are de-commissioning the SECOND oldest
carrier in the arsenal, the Constellation.

Why not put the FIRST oldest (whatever it may be) carrier out to pasture
first?
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #5  
Old July 15th 03, 05:27 AM
Jeff Franks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

IIRC, I believe the Kitty Hawk is the oldest in the fleet now...and now the
last conventional.



"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:7UKQa.63719$Ph3.7087@sccrnsc04...
The results of a little quick Googling:
http://www.navy.mil/homepages/cv64/noflash/home.htm


Thanks, John. Interesting that they are de-commissioning the SECOND

oldest
carrier in the arsenal, the Constellation.

Why not put the FIRST oldest (whatever it may be) carrier out to pasture
first?
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"




  #6  
Old July 15th 03, 05:47 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Jeff Franks wrote:

IIRC, I believe the Kitty Hawk is the oldest in the fleet now...and now the
last conventional.


According to the CV-64 news, Constellation is "one of only three remaining
conventionally powered aircraft carriers in its arsenal." And, since the
Constellation won't actually be decommissioned for a few more weeks, there
are still three in the fleet.

George Patterson
The optimist feels that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist is afraid that he's correct.
James Branch Cavel
  #7  
Old July 15th 03, 07:21 AM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jay

The "Jimmy Carter" is under construction and will probably replace the
one that is oldest now. It's condition inspection may have shown it to
be in best shape so was extended until the Carter comes on line?

As an aside, what did Jimmy ever do to warrant naming a carrier after
him (

Big John


On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 03:52:35 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote:

The results of a little quick Googling:
http://www.navy.mil/homepages/cv64/noflash/home.htm


Thanks, John. Interesting that they are de-commissioning the SECOND oldest
carrier in the arsenal, the Constellation.

Why not put the FIRST oldest (whatever it may be) carrier out to pasture
first?


  #8  
Old July 15th 03, 08:47 AM
Wolfie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Big John" wrote

The "Jimmy Carter" is under construction and will probably replace the
one that is oldest now.


The next carrier (the 10th Nimitz class) will be the
"USS George H. W. Bush."

The "USS Jimmy Carter" will be a Seawolf class
submarine.

As an aside, what did Jimmy ever do to warrant naming
a carrier after him (


He graduated (with distinction) from the US Naval Academy,
for one. Served seven years in the Navy for another, including
being selected by Rickover for the nuclear navy. He resigned
to take over the family business when his father died or he'd
probably never have went into politics.

All in all, I'd say he's *far* more appropriate a choice than
Reagan. And arguably a better choice than Bush. But he
gets a sub named after him, which seems to be appropriate
since he's the only submariner to serve as President.

As an another aside, ships also have sponsors, as Nancy
Reagan is for the USS Ronald Reagan and Rosalind
Carter is for the USS Jimmy Carter. For the USS George
HW Bush? Doro B. Koch, Bush's daughter. What's up
with that? Koch is the Bush's sponsor?



  #9  
Old July 15th 03, 09:22 AM
Grumman-581
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jeff Franks" wrote ...
IIRC, I believe the Kitty Hawk is the oldest in the fleet now...and now

the
last conventional.


The America is no longer in service? When I was stationed aboard the
Nimitz, the America was also there in Norfolk... I knew some guys from ET
'A' school who were stationed aboard her...

Now, if they would take some of these carriers that they are retiring and
sink them as artifical reefs, that would make for some interesting diving...


  #10  
Old July 15th 03, 11:51 AM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Big John
wrote:

Jay

The "Jimmy Carter" is under construction and will probably replace the
one that is oldest now. It's condition inspection may have shown it to
be in best shape so was extended until the Carter comes on line?

As an aside, what did Jimmy ever do to warrant naming a carrier after
him (


iirc, during his administration the Navy buildup was started.

--
Bob Noel
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VOR/DME Approach Question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 47 August 29th 04 05:03 AM
General Zinni on Sixty Minutes WalterM140 Military Aviation 428 July 1st 04 11:16 PM
~ I WISH RONALD REAGAN WAS STILL ALIVE ~ ArtKramr Military Aviation 1 June 9th 04 12:49 AM
Question about Question 4488 [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 October 27th 03 01:26 AM
Wildcat on the Ronald Reagan Charles Talleyrand Naval Aviation 30 September 27th 03 04:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.