Pentagon "plane" crash revised

(Peter Stickney) wrote:



I think John Tarver would be within his rights to have that web page killed.
Dave


GB wrote:
Speaking of which...the dudster is the only one of that team that
I've seen since that hoohaw...any cruise missiles missing?

Nope. I'm still about, just doing teh Holiday Thing.
I won't sweat Cruise Missiles too much, though. Back when I was
writing the code for the image processing for the DSMAC (Digital Scene
Matching and Area Correlation, pronounced "Dismack") guidance system,
I put myself on its "Do Not Call" list.

Might be smart of John to try getting on there too (or else
leave duds alone...
--

-Gord.

You spun it again Michael,,,99.9% of us understood his remarks to mean
you have "zero,nada,none, as in no credibility, How can you twist
this???

Michael doesn't let his blind hatred of America ever come between him and his
love of pathetically lost causes. That's why we enjoy his periodic
appearances, like some traveling village idiot, come to spread a little
foolishness. The sad part is his Rube-like insistance that his myopic vision
is clearer than everyone elses.

First, I thought he was confused, now, I think he has some sort of mental
limitation. He could be a career for some young psychoanalyst.

G

On 28 Dec 2003 06:40:49 GMT, nt (Krztalizer) wrote:


You spun it again Michael,,,99.9% of us understood his remarks to mean
you have "zero,nada,none, as in no credibility, How can you twist
this???

Michael doesn't let his blind hatred of America ever come between him and his
love of pathetically lost causes. That's why we enjoy his periodic
appearances, like some traveling village idiot, come to spread a little
foolishness. The sad part is his Rube-like insistance that his myopic vision
is clearer than everyone elses.

First, I thought he was confused, now, I think he has some sort of mental
limitation. He could be a career for some young psychoanalyst.

G

You left out one other possibility, he could be a lawyer!!!

Al Minyard

nt (Krztalizer) wrote in message ...

You spun it again Michael,,,99.9% of us understood his remarks to mean
you have "zero,nada,none, as in no credibility, How can you twist
this???

Michael doesn't let his blind hatred of America ever come between him and his
love of pathetically lost causes. That's why we enjoy his periodic
appearances, like some traveling village idiot, come to spread a little
foolishness. The sad part is his Rube-like insistance that his myopic vision
is clearer than everyone elses.

Well unlike your comment on the factual materials cited this one is
at least selconsistent theory. However the question remains was it
you who said one day I am brilliant?


First, I thought he was confused, now, I think he has some sort of mental
limitation. He could be a career for some young psychoanalyst.

Have noting against if he/she (preferably she) is indeed young, energetic
and successful, rather than old and stuipid...

Michael

G

Michael askes:

However the question remains was it
you who said one day I am brilliant?

Depending on the circumstances - it may have been irony or I was commenting on
your idiot savant status. With these latest posts, its too sad to even make
jokes. You _believe_ *anything*, as long as it makes the US look bad. With a
world-view like that, what's the point of debate? You just plain look stupid,
Michael. Engaging in discourse with you only takes me away from more
intelligent conversations with other people, with vastly more open minds than
yours.

He could be a career for some young psychoanalyst.

Have noting against if he/she (preferably she) is indeed young, energetic
and successful, rather than old and stuipid...

Well, admitting you need help is a vital first step, Michael. This is a good
start, but it won't help unless you take it seriously.

nt (Krztalizer) wrote in message ...
Michael askes:

However the question remains was it
you who said one day I am brilliant?

Depending on the circumstances - it may have been irony or I was commenting on
your idiot savant status. With these latest posts, its too sad to even make
jokes. You _believe_ *anything*, as long as it makes the US look bad.

why not? particularly if US provides us one opportunity after another,

With a
world-view like that, what's the point of debate?

for your? well I can tell you what is your point.
you try to protect your ****ty criminal government from legitimate
and based on reliable data questions. You obviousely decided
that if you deny the clear well documented evidences and start personal
attack against those who may have a different opinions
on that matters this may help your country. Naive!
Exactly this is very damaging and will destroy it in
the most effective way. Denying the true is very
unprofitable.

You just plain look stupid,
Michael.

Unlikely.

Engaging in discourse with you only takes me away from more
intelligent conversations with other people, with vastly more open minds than
yours.

If so stop it. Just for test you. Can you afford not to respond
to this post, gordon?


He could be a career for some young psychoanalyst.

Have noting against if he/she (preferably she) is indeed young, energetic
and successful, rather than old and stuipid...

Well, admitting you need help is a vital first step, Michael. This is a good
start, but it won't help unless you take it seriously.

words empty words as usual for you. Even you gordon do not
believe that. The question is what is the point for me to
talk with you?

Michael

Does anyone have a clue how old Michael is?


14 or 15 is my guess. Although he could be 45 with a 14 or 15 year old mental
capacity and maturity?


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"