If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Lance vx. 6/300
What's the difference between these aircraft? Is one simply a continuation
of the other? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What's the difference between these aircraft? Is one simply a
continuation of the other? Isn't the Lance retractable? Or did they make a fixed-gear version? If it's the latter, I can't imagine too many differences between the birds... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The Cherokee 6 is a fixed gear, six place Piper. The Lance is retractable, but
also, for a period,was built with a T tail. The T tail stabilator is too small and, being out of the prop wash, is relatively unresponsive at slow airspeeds and can be a real handful for even experienced pilots. I'd recommend that you stay away from the T tail Lance. The normal configuration Lance is a nice plane to fly, however. On the other hand, the Cherokee Six is a real work horse and a nice plane to fly. Other than that, basically the same plane. Bridgadoon wrote: What's the difference between these aircraft? Is one simply a continuation of the other? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Pat Barry wrote in :
The Cherokee 6 is a fixed gear, six place Piper. The Lance is retractable, but also, for a period,was built with a T tail. The T tail stabilator is too small and, being out of the prop wash, is relatively unresponsive at slow airspeeds and can be a real handful for even experienced pilots. I'd recommend that you stay away from the T tail Lance. The normal configuration Lance is a nice plane to fly, however. Why, pray tell, would you stay away from the T-tail Lance? Ever flown one? -- John Godwin Silicon Rallye Inc. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"John Godwin" wrote in message ... Pat Barry wrote in : The Cherokee 6 is a fixed gear, six place Piper. The Lance is retractable, but also, for a period,was built with a T tail. The T tail stabilator is too small and, being out of the prop wash, is relatively unresponsive at slow airspeeds and can be a real handful for even experienced pilots. I'd recommend that you stay away from the T tail Lance. The normal configuration Lance is a nice plane to fly, however. Why, pray tell, would you stay away from the T-tail Lance? Ever flown one? -- John Godwin Silicon Rallye Inc. Because either: 1) he flew one and wasn't trained properly on how to use the trim... or 2) he never flew one and believes the folklore propagated by some people who weren't trained properly on how to use the trim If you fly a T-tail (any manufacturer) like a conventional tail, you won't be happy. If you trim it properly, it flies off the runway easily, just like most other airplanes. I have 1,200 hours in my T-Lance, and after the first few hours of learning, it's simply a non-issue. Of course, the fact that my initial instructor flew a T-tail King Air every day, could have something to do with knowing how to operate it. Unfortunately, Piper's flight manual did not cover the subject at all. If you want to blame something, blame the book, which certainly is poor. The piper T-tail trim doesn't just affect spring pressure. It affects the aerodynamics of the tail. That means problems, when you put the trim in the middle (what Piper notes as "takeoff"), but actually are in a very forward CG loading. That's what you are when its just you and an instructor, with no one in the back, the typical scenario when a prospective purchaser tries out an airplane. In such a CG loading, if you set the trim aft, the ship will fly itself off the runway at 60-65 knots. Of course, unless you plan to climb at 65 knots, upon rotation, start retrimming forward. No surprise there, if you're flying anything bigger - just normal procedure. If you had set the trim in the middle, you would need to pull the yoke back farther, to compensate for the trim being in the wrong place. Pulling it back farther moves the entire stabilator, creating more drag, hence longer takeoff distances that untrained pilots report. When that pilot finally does leave the ground, he's pulling back so hard on the yoke, that he over rotates, has to now push forward *hard*, and bobbles up and down. Not a good feeling, so it must be the airplane's fault, right? Even if the pilot forcibly holds the yoke in the "correct" place, ignoring the pressures, he'll still roll a long way down the runway. I'm not an aerodynamic engineer, and I know Piper's trim is primarily a spring pressure system, but it's easy to demonstrate. If you have someone run the trim while you watch the trim tab on the rear edge of the stabilator, you can see it moves when trim is changed. All you have to do, is run two takeoffs, one with middle trim, and the other in more "up" trim, and the difference will be quite obvious. Trim it correctly, use 2 notches of flaps always, and you'll rotate in 1200 to 1500 feet, at sea level, depending on loading. Trim it wrong, and you'll be rolling down the runway easily twice that. You can see where the folklore comes from. It's not that the people initially unhappy were liars, they just weren't trained. Just remember to use the appropriate takeoff trim position, depending on loading, which in other loading configurations could be just the opposite. Piper did a very poor job of communicating how to fly these things. The operations manual explains none of this. If you truly do fly it "by the book", (which basically says "put it in the middle"), you'll be disappointed. The only true negative quality, is that a soft field takeoff simply doesn't exist. You can't raise the nose below 50 knots, because the tail is not in the prop wash. If you fly in and out of unpaved fields, this is probably not your airplane, but for that matter neither is the Saratoga, because Piper's retractible gear is not particularly rugged anyway. If you use a retractable Piper-6 in any variant on unpaved strips, you're going to spend a lot of money repeatedly rebuilding the gear. None of these are the right choice for grass strips. For that use, buy a Bonanza. The positive qualities are that the T-tail airplanes experience absolutely no trim change with flap or gear extension. The stabilator is up in clear air, undisturbed by flap or gear extension. That's something nice when you're busy on instruments. When I fly a conventional tail now (rare, since I usually fly my own ship), I have to remember to compensate. Of course, the other nice quality is that you can usually purchase a T-tail for $5k to $10k less, because of the folklore. Overall, they're neither better or worse, if each is operated correctly. I usually don't sign my name in newsgroups, to keep the spam down, but since the flames will follow this post, here you go... don ferrario Lance N54SS www.donferrario.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"CarSalesman" wrote in
: I usually don't sign my name in newsgroups, to keep the spam down, but since the flames will follow this post, here you go... After many hours in the T-tail Lance also, the only irritant I can think of was having to carry a small step stool for preflight inspection of the stabilator. Other than that, it was a joy to fly. -- John Godwin Silicon Rallye Inc. (remove SPAMNOT from email address) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
("CarSalesman" sig)
Lance N54SS www.donferrario.com Nice web site Nice house photos Nice wildlife photos Nice photos of many things Um, any plane pictures? Looks like your plane might have gotten you to a photo shoot or two - just guessing. -- Montblack |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Good idea. I'll have to add some of those.
Wanna buy a house? don "Montblack" wrote in message .. . ("CarSalesman" sig) Lance N54SS www.donferrario.com Nice web site Nice house photos Nice wildlife photos Nice photos of many things Um, any plane pictures? Looks like your plane might have gotten you to a photo shoot or two - just guessing. -- Montblack |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Bridgadoon" wrote in message ...
What's the difference between these aircraft? Is one simply a continuation of the other? I was very pleased to see the 6X at Sun-n-Fun when Piper (re)introduced it. But for $330K+ to get VFR only, I'd spend that money in a mid-90's used Saratoga. I'd been contemplating buying a PA-32 of some kind for a while and noted that the used Lance prices were significantly lower than the used Saratoga prices. Differences being, as mentioned he Lance: straight wing, T-tail, retract, older(78-79) Saratoga: tapered wing, straight tail, retract or fixed, newer(80 onward) A LOT of pilots are against the T-tail for the alleged instability at low speeds, and I think that's the biggest reason for the lower value. It flies and carries roughly the same as the Saratoga, though, so all other things considered about equal, I might have gone with a Lance, until...... Found me a beautiful 72' 6-300 decked out with great avionics and new leather interior for under $90K (1700 SMOH/3700 TTAF). After a 4 hour pre-buy that revealed an overall well cared for beast, I jumped on it. When I step inside, the first thing I and my passengers thinks is ROOOOOOOMY! I LOVE the PA-32 airframe. And, the 1000 pound payload(with full fuel) is fantastic. For these reasons, my next step-up (someday) will be a Saratoga or Senecca. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave" wrote in message m... "Bridgadoon" wrote in message ... Lance: straight wing, T-tail, retract, older(78-79) Saratoga: tapered wing, straight tail, retract or fixed, newer(80 onward) A LOT of pilots are against the T-tail for the alleged instability at low speeds, and I think that's the biggest reason for the lower value. It flies and carries roughly the same as the Saratoga, though, so all other things considered about equal, I might have gone with a Lance, until...... Funny that you never hear Gulfstream pilots complaining about the location of the tail on their aircraft, or King Air 200 pilots. Mike MU-2 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wanted clever PA32 engineer's thoughts - Gear extention problem on Piper Lance | [email protected] | Owning | 5 | July 22nd 03 12:35 AM |