A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aircraft Takeoff speeds



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old January 30th 04, 10:44 PM
John Carrier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The F4E carrying dispensers for the CBU38 (? antitank munitions) on
the inboard pylons rotated at 196 but that was a CG problem. FWIW we
got one batch of F104 tires that were built and designed to someone's
erroneous specifications (built to a newly specified design) and we
were throwing treads off brand new tires on a light-loaded zipper -
only gun ammo and 2xAIM9s aboard. That was interesting . . . Shortly
thereafter the specs were changed to a performance criterion and the
problems disappeared.


The Phantoms I flew had a tire speed limit of 190. The aircraft would take
off no flap at about 175. It's true that unstick was a problem with
forward CG, I just find it amazing it required that much speed in the
configuration you describe.

CQ fuel weight cat shots required full aft stick ... typical fighter mission
(single centerline and 2x2 missiles) full aft and then a wrist rotation
forward of that.

Of all the aircraft I've flown, only the F-4 and the TA-4 had an issue with
T/O rotation. The F-8 required very little (obvious from its
configuration).

R / John


  #12  
Old January 30th 04, 11:30 PM
Pete
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"WaltBJ" wrote in message
snip
Tires are built for much higher speeds -
and you can buy them for your car. A waste of money unless you have
the right car, though.


I don't think so, do you have a reference for the car tire?


While not *over* 200mph, this is close.
(Y) rated - tested to 186+mph
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete...eral/speed.htm

Seeing as there are cars that can and will do 200+, it would stand to reason
that there are tires built for them.
http://www.fantasycars.com/McLaren_F1/mclaren_f1.html

Pete


  #13  
Old January 31st 04, 01:34 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Pete" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"WaltBJ" wrote in message
snip
Tires are built for much higher speeds -
and you can buy them for your car. A waste of money unless you have
the right car, though.


I don't think so, do you have a reference for the car tire?


While not *over* 200mph, this is close.
(Y) rated - tested to 186+mph
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete...eral/speed.htm


I believe this tire contains rubber and would not be suitable for space
vehicles.

Seeing as there are cars that can and will do 200+, it would stand to

reason
that there are tires built for them.
http://www.fantasycars.com/McLaren_F1/mclaren_f1.html

Pete




  #14  
Old January 31st 04, 07:59 AM
John Mullen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tarver Engineering wrote:
"Pete" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"WaltBJ" wrote in message
snip

Tires are built for much higher speeds -
and you can buy them for your car. A waste of money unless you have
the right car, though.

I don't think so, do you have a reference for the car tire?


While not *over* 200mph, this is close.
(Y) rated - tested to 186+mph
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete...eral/speed.htm



I believe this tire contains rubber and would not be suitable for space
vehicles.


Seeing as there are cars that can and will do 200+, it would stand to


reason

that there are tires built for them.
http://www.fantasycars.com/McLaren_F1/mclaren_f1.html


Funny it doesn't say anything here about them not being made of rubber
http://aviation.webmichelin.com/about/space.html

John

  #15  
Old January 31st 04, 08:25 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Mullen" wrote in message
...
Tarver Engineering wrote:
"Pete" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"WaltBJ" wrote in message
snip

Tires are built for much higher speeds -
and you can buy them for your car. A waste of money unless you have
the right car, though.

I don't think so, do you have a reference for the car tire?

While not *over* 200mph, this is close.
(Y) rated - tested to 186+mph
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete...eral/speed.htm



I believe this tire contains rubber and would not be suitable for space
vehicles.


Seeing as there are cars that can and will do 200+, it would stand to


reason

that there are tires built for them.
http://www.fantasycars.com/McLaren_F1/mclaren_f1.html


Funny it doesn't say anything here about them not being made of rubber
http://aviation.webmichelin.com/about/space.html


Noone cares what you don't know, Mullen.


  #16  
Old January 31st 04, 01:07 PM
John Mullen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tarver Engineering wrote:
"John Mullen" wrote in message
...

Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Pete" wrote in message
. ..


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...


"WaltBJ" wrote in message
snip

Tires are built for much higher speeds -
and you can buy them for your car. A waste of money unless you have
the right car, though.

I don't think so, do you have a reference for the car tire?

While not *over* 200mph, this is close.
(Y) rated - tested to 186+mph
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete...eral/speed.htm


I believe this tire contains rubber and would not be suitable for space
vehicles.



Seeing as there are cars that can and will do 200+, it would stand to

reason


that there are tires built for them.
http://www.fantasycars.com/McLaren_F1/mclaren_f1.html


Funny it doesn't say anything here about them not being made of rubber
http://aviation.webmichelin.com/about/space.html



Noone cares what you don't know, Mullen.



ISWYM. I certainly don't have such massive ignorance as you, splappy.

John

  #17  
Old January 31st 04, 03:14 PM
boomer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

can you guys take your "tire war" to another thread please, jeeze.


"John Mullen" wrote in message
...
Tarver Engineering wrote:
"John Mullen" wrote in message
...

Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Pete" wrote in message
. ..


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...


"WaltBJ" wrote in message
snip

Tires are built for much higher speeds -
and you can buy them for your car. A waste of money unless you have
the right car, though.

I don't think so, do you have a reference for the car tire?

While not *over* 200mph, this is close.
(Y) rated - tested to 186+mph
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete...eral/speed.htm


I believe this tire contains rubber and would not be suitable for space
vehicles.



Seeing as there are cars that can and will do 200+, it would stand to

reason


that there are tires built for them.
http://www.fantasycars.com/McLaren_F1/mclaren_f1.html

Funny it doesn't say anything here about them not being made of rubber
http://aviation.webmichelin.com/about/space.html



Noone cares what you don't know, Mullen.



ISWYM. I certainly don't have such massive ignorance as you, splappy.

John



  #18  
Old January 31st 04, 03:58 PM
John Mullen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

boomer wrote:
can you guys take your "tire war" to another thread please, jeeze.


"John Mullen" wrote in message
...

Tarver Engineering wrote:

"John Mullen" wrote in message
...


Tarver Engineering wrote:


"Pete" wrote in message
m...



"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...



"WaltBJ" wrote in message
snip

Tires are built for much higher speeds -
and you can buy them for your car. A waste of money unless you have
the right car, though.

I don't think so, do you have a reference for the car tire?

While not *over* 200mph, this is close.
(Y) rated - tested to 186+mph
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete...eral/speed.htm


I believe this tire contains rubber and would not be suitable for space
vehicles.




Seeing as there are cars that can and will do 200+, it would stand to

reason



that there are tires built for them.
http://www.fantasycars.com/McLaren_F1/mclaren_f1.html

Funny it doesn't say anything here about them not being made of rubber
http://aviation.webmichelin.com/about/space.html


Noone cares what you don't know, Mullen.



ISWYM. I certainly don't have such massive ignorance as you, splappy.

John


Can you not top-post. Jeez.

John

  #19  
Old January 31st 04, 04:04 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Mullen" wrote in message
...

Noone cares what you don't know, Mullen.



ISWYM. I certainly don't have such massive ignorance as you, splappy.


Such sweet irony.

Let's see now, a troll of ram doesn't know something, so I must not know it.

Bwahahahahahahaha


  #20  
Old January 31st 04, 11:19 PM
boomer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I started the thread, I'll do as I like. Contribute or start your OWN thread
!


"John Mullen" wrote in message
...
boomer wrote:
can you guys take your "tire war" to another thread please, jeeze.


"John Mullen" wrote in message
...

Tarver Engineering wrote:

"John Mullen" wrote in message
...


Tarver Engineering wrote:


"Pete" wrote in message
m...



"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...



"WaltBJ" wrote in message
snip

Tires are built for much higher speeds -
and you can buy them for your car. A waste of money unless you

have
the right car, though.

I don't think so, do you have a reference for the car tire?

While not *over* 200mph, this is close.
(Y) rated - tested to 186+mph
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete...eral/speed.htm


I believe this tire contains rubber and would not be suitable for

space
vehicles.




Seeing as there are cars that can and will do 200+, it would stand

to

reason



that there are tires built for them.
http://www.fantasycars.com/McLaren_F1/mclaren_f1.html

Funny it doesn't say anything here about them not being made of rubber
http://aviation.webmichelin.com/about/space.html


Noone cares what you don't know, Mullen.



ISWYM. I certainly don't have such massive ignorance as you, splappy.

John


Can you not top-post. Jeez.

John



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 40 October 3rd 08 03:13 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 October 1st 04 02:31 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 September 2nd 04 05:15 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 May 1st 04 07:29 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 1 January 2nd 04 09:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.