Logging PIC time as student instrument pilot in IMC

"Todd Pattist" wrote in message
...

However, as someone pointed out, my post really was more about correcting
logbook errors.

You got more interest in the first part (your incorrect
assumption) since that has a right/wrong answer and makes a
difference. How you make entries in the logbook is merely a
preference with no real importance to anyone except neatniks
:-)

The fact that I may not have the error I think I have was
secondary.

To you, perhaps, but many who post here are more interested
in answering questions that seem to be important to them
than questions that are merely important to you :-)

Another possible line of inquiry might be:

Has anyone had any grief from a DE or FAA rep about the way they made
corrections in their logbook? What was it that made the examiner unhappy?

(to the people in r.a.p and not r.a.i, welcome to the thread)

-- David Brooks

On 1 Aug 2003 15:48:15 -0700, (Alex) wrote:

I had an FAA Safety Inspector once scold me for having poor
handwriting. He said that the way I kept my log book spoke volumes of
the way I flew (this was before we flew together).

Next he refused to pass me on the oral portion of the test until I
took my log book and converted all the ditto marks to actual
make/models and identifiers. So I sat in the corner and crossed out
the three years I owned an airplane and wrote in the same make/model
and ident on every line.

I will not chew gum in class. I will not chew gum in class.
I will not chew gum in class. I will not chew gum in class.
I will not chew gum in class. I will not chew gum in class.
I will not chew gum in class. I will not chew gum in class.
I will not chew gum in class. I will not chew gum in class.
I will not chew gum in class. I will not chew gum in class.
I will not chew gum in class. I will not chew gum in class.
I will not chew gum in class. I will not chew gum in class.
I will not chew gum in class. I will not chew gum in class...

Mike Weller