A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Rotorcraft
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Co-axial kit helicopter



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 28th 05, 07:00 AM
Blue
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New Co-axial kit helicopter

Interesting new co-axial from Russia. Not too much info yet as it is a
prototype. However all static and ground tests made, flying time only 12
hours. More info will be available after all tests. Check out these web
sites for info.

http://www.airtrikes.net/heli.jpg

http://delta.wtr.ru/wtboard/40671.shtml

www.clubrotor.ru




  #2  
Old August 28th 05, 07:10 AM
Shiver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Blue wrote:

Interesting new co-axial from Russia. Not too much info yet as it is a
prototype. However all static and ground tests made, flying time only 12
hours. More info will be available after all tests. Check out these web
sites for info.

http://www.airtrikes.net/heli.jpg

http://delta.wtr.ru/wtboard/40671.shtml

www.clubrotor.ru


Well that's a good looking little ship.

Powered by a four cyliner if my tired eyes are seeing correct.
  #3  
Old August 28th 05, 11:44 AM
Blue
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yep, thats a 912ULS sitting up there.

--

Regards

Blue

"Shiver" wrote in message
...
Blue wrote:


Interesting new co-axial from Russia. Not too much info yet as it is a
prototype. However all static and ground tests made, flying time only 12
hours. More info will be available after all tests. Check out these web
sites for info.

http://www.airtrikes.net/heli.jpg

http://delta.wtr.ru/wtboard/40671.shtml

www.clubrotor.ru


Well that's a good looking little ship.

Powered by a four cyliner if my tired eyes are seeing correct.



  #4  
Old August 29th 05, 04:24 AM
Stuart & Kathryn Fields
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Very interesting. I can't see any pitch control linkage to the blades.
Don't read Russian, but do they say anything about autorotation?

--
Stuart Fields
Experimental Helo magazine
P. O. Box 1585
Inyokern, CA 93527
(760) 377-4478
(760) 408-9747 general and layout cell
(760) 608-1299 technical and advertising cell

www.vkss.com
www.experimentalhelo.com


"Blue" wrote in message
u...
Interesting new co-axial from Russia. Not too much info yet as it is a
prototype. However all static and ground tests made, flying time only 12
hours. More info will be available after all tests. Check out these web
sites for info.

http://www.airtrikes.net/heli.jpg

http://delta.wtr.ru/wtboard/40671.shtml

www.clubrotor.ru






  #5  
Old August 29th 05, 10:53 AM
Peter Seddon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This website gives quite an interesting history of Kamov who have been
making co-axials for many years
http://avia.russian.ee/vertigo/peopl...v/index_2.html and are the makers
of this latest one.

On this latest single place the lower swashplate is visible in some photos
and it looks like the pitch arms for the upper rotor go down the center of
the main shaft.

Regards Peter


"Stuart & Kathryn Fields" wrote in message
...
Very interesting. I can't see any pitch control linkage to the blades.
Don't read Russian, but do they say anything about autorotation?

--
Stuart Fields
Experimental Helo magazine
P. O. Box 1585
Inyokern, CA 93527
(760) 377-4478
(760) 408-9747 general and layout cell
(760) 608-1299 technical and advertising cell

www.vkss.com
www.experimentalhelo.com


"Blue" wrote in message
u...
Interesting new co-axial from Russia. Not too much info yet as it is a
prototype. However all static and ground tests made, flying time only 12
hours. More info will be available after all tests. Check out these web
sites for info.

http://www.airtrikes.net/heli.jpg

http://delta.wtr.ru/wtboard/40671.shtml

www.clubrotor.ru








  #6  
Old August 29th 05, 12:02 PM
Simon Robbins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Blue" wrote in message
u...
Interesting new co-axial from Russia. Not too much info yet as it is a
prototype. However all static and ground tests made, flying time only 12
hours. More info will be available after all tests. Check out these web
sites for info.


Beautiful looking machine. How does one go about type rating training on a
single seater, btw?

Si


  #7  
Old August 29th 05, 10:59 PM
Flyingmonk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks for posting this! Very interesting indeed... Where's Dave
Jackson? Comments Dave?

Bryan "The Monk" Chaisone

  #8  
Old August 30th 05, 09:10 PM
Terry Spragg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter Seddon wrote:
This website gives quite an interesting history of Kamov who have been
making co-axials for many years
http://avia.russian.ee/vertigo/peopl...v/index_2.html and are the makers
of this latest one.

On this latest single place the lower swashplate is visible in some photos
and it looks like the pitch arms for the upper rotor go down the center of
the main shaft.

Regards Peter


"Stuart & Kathryn Fields" wrote in message
...

Very interesting. I can't see any pitch control linkage to the blades.
Don't read Russian, but do they say anything about autorotation?


I don't see any evidence of pitch links at all, unless they are
hydraulic, with rotating hydraulic joints, hydraulic tubes inside
the shafts, and very small actuators.

For autorotation, it could use engine torque actuated linkages to
adjust collective for autorotation. If engine torque goes to zero,
pitch goes to negative, pilot alarm is momentary negative gees and
imposed descent - forced autorotation on power loss. I suggested
such an idea several years ago on this forum. You don't think they
stole my idea? Or maybe they adjust pitch by moving the relative
position of three concentric rotating shafts up and down a half inch
or so? There might not be any cyclic control at all.

Why not?

Yaw control by differential rotor torque and tailfin in downwash /
slipstream?

Now, if it was only quiet enough to tolerate in your back yard,
everyone would want one. The tranny design is a doddle kept secret
by commercial mil / ind complex, its an automotive differential,
with one half turned inside out.

Terry K

  #9  
Old September 5th 05, 01:29 AM
Stuart & Kathryn Fields
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Terry: Your description sounds interesting but it also sounds like side
translation would not be possible without cyclic which would make hovering
quite a dance.

--
Stuart Fields
Experimental Helo magazine
P. O. Box 1585
Inyokern, CA 93527
(760) 377-4478
(760) 408-9747 general and layout cell
(760) 608-1299 technical and advertising cell

www.vkss.com
www.experimentalhelo.com


"Terry Spragg" wrote in message
...
Peter Seddon wrote:
This website gives quite an interesting history of Kamov who have been
making co-axials for many years
http://avia.russian.ee/vertigo/peopl...v/index_2.html and are the
makers
of this latest one.

On this latest single place the lower swashplate is visible in some

photos
and it looks like the pitch arms for the upper rotor go down the center

of
the main shaft.

Regards Peter


"Stuart & Kathryn Fields" wrote in message
...

Very interesting. I can't see any pitch control linkage to the blades.
Don't read Russian, but do they say anything about autorotation?


I don't see any evidence of pitch links at all, unless they are
hydraulic, with rotating hydraulic joints, hydraulic tubes inside
the shafts, and very small actuators.

For autorotation, it could use engine torque actuated linkages to
adjust collective for autorotation. If engine torque goes to zero,
pitch goes to negative, pilot alarm is momentary negative gees and
imposed descent - forced autorotation on power loss. I suggested
such an idea several years ago on this forum. You don't think they
stole my idea? Or maybe they adjust pitch by moving the relative
position of three concentric rotating shafts up and down a half inch
or so? There might not be any cyclic control at all.

Why not?

Yaw control by differential rotor torque and tailfin in downwash /
slipstream?

Now, if it was only quiet enough to tolerate in your back yard,
everyone would want one. The tranny design is a doddle kept secret
by commercial mil / ind complex, its an automotive differential,
with one half turned inside out.

Terry K



  #10  
Old September 5th 05, 05:24 PM
Peter Seddon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This was the pic that made me think the pitch links go down the main shaft
for the top rotor. http://www.clubrotor.ru/album/gel8.jpg

The pic also shows the botton swash and pitch links.

All the kamaov machines that I have seen on their webiste have both rotors
controlled by pitch links.

Regards Peter


"Terry Spragg" wrote in message
...
Peter Seddon wrote:
This website gives quite an interesting history of Kamov who have been
making co-axials for many years
http://avia.russian.ee/vertigo/peopl...v/index_2.html and are the
makers of this latest one.

On this latest single place the lower swashplate is visible in some
photos and it looks like the pitch arms for the upper rotor go down the
center of the main shaft.

Regards Peter


"Stuart & Kathryn Fields" wrote in message
...

Very interesting. I can't see any pitch control linkage to the blades.
Don't read Russian, but do they say anything about autorotation?


I don't see any evidence of pitch links at all, unless they are hydraulic,
with rotating hydraulic joints, hydraulic tubes inside the shafts, and
very small actuators.

For autorotation, it could use engine torque actuated linkages to adjust
collective for autorotation. If engine torque goes to zero, pitch goes to
negative, pilot alarm is momentary negative gees and imposed descent -
forced autorotation on power loss. I suggested such an idea several years
ago on this forum. You don't think they stole my idea? Or maybe they
adjust pitch by moving the relative position of three concentric rotating
shafts up and down a half inch or so? There might not be any cyclic
control at all.

Why not?

Yaw control by differential rotor torque and tailfin in downwash /
slipstream?

Now, if it was only quiet enough to tolerate in your back yard, everyone
would want one. The tranny design is a doddle kept secret by commercial
mil / ind complex, its an automotive differential, with one half turned
inside out.

Terry K



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Lockheed wins Presidential helicopter contract Tiger Naval Aviation 0 January 29th 05 05:24 AM
Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot Badwater Bill Home Built 6 February 27th 04 09:11 AM
Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot Badwater Bill Rotorcraft 0 February 25th 04 06:39 PM
Helicopter crash video James Blakely Piloting 17 December 30th 03 03:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.