A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Higher Cost at Annual:newer ('97-'00) 172R/SP or 1970's 172?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 5th 06, 07:10 PM
XrayYankee XrayYankee is offline
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: Apr 2006
Posts: 2
Default Higher Cost at Annual:newer ('97-'00) 172R/SP or 1970's 172?

Trying to judge which will be more expensive at annual. A newer 172R or S, or going very used, back to a 172M or N 1974-1979 era. Are there a lot more potential pitfalls and expenses that will continue to add up each year at annual for spending less up front to get an older 172? I assume parts are still fairly easy to find because it is a 172, and still not too expensive? Or now that we're reaching 30+ years old, maybe it's better to spend more money up front and get a newer (used--'97-'00) 172R/S. Anyone that has gone though a few annuals with older or newer ones, it'd be interesting to hear feedback.
thanks.
  #2  
Old May 6th 06, 02:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Higher Cost at Annual:newer ('97-'00) 172R/SP or 1970's 172?

XrayYankee wrote:
Trying to judge which will be more expensive at annual. A newer 172R or
S, or going very used, back to a 172M or N 1974-1979 era.


The "annual" will cost the same. It is an inspection, nothing more. I
believe we have hashed this point out extensively on this newsgroup. The
cost that differs significantly among airplanes, owners, and mechanics
is the cost to PREPARE for the annual. Since many owners only get things
fixed when their mechanic points them out DURING the annual inspection,
some owners confuse annual inspection costs with maintenance and upgrade
costs.

Preparing for the annual in a nearly new bird SHOULD cost less. This
will be offset by the dramatically higher acquisition cost. The older
bird receiving a steady diet of cash to keep it in good shape will
likely cost more to prepare for the annual. Again, this is offset by the
lower initial acquisition cost. I would be difficult to tell in the long
run which is the lower TCO. There are too many variables.

For example:
If you buy a plane in decent condition that was well maintained and
regularly upgraded (where old systems were replaced) AND you and your
mechanic are "fix it up cheap only when it breaks" kind of people, then
the cost of preparation will likely be very low - nearly zero. Then,
there is the opposite extreme. If you buy a plane that is run out, beat,
ill maintained, never saw a new part in 30 years AND you and your wrench
are very particular, then preparing for the annual could well exceed the
purchase price of the plane - possibly several time over.

Then, there is everything in between. Given all that, it is tough to
predict what the TCO will be in your particular case.

Good Luck,
Mike


  #3  
Old May 6th 06, 05:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Higher Cost at Annual:newer ('97-'00) 172R/SP or 1970's 172?

I would expect a 172 to be in the neighborhood of $15 an hour for
maintenance. This does not include fee to annual. And like all planes,
you better be prepared to throw $20k at it at any random moment in
time....

  #4  
Old May 8th 06, 01:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Higher Cost at Annual:newer ('97-'00) 172R/SP or 1970's 172?

Mike Spera wrote:
XrayYankee wrote:
Trying to judge which will be more expensive at annual. A newer 172R or
S, or going very used, back to a 172M or N 1974-1979 era.


The "annual" will cost the same. It is an inspection, nothing more. I
believe we have hashed this point out extensively on this newsgroup. The
cost that differs significantly among airplanes, owners, and mechanics
is the cost to PREPARE for the annual.


Well, on an older plane, there are more logs to go and possibly more
AD's to check especially the first time a given IA works on the plane.

Of course, that being said, even the longer history pales in comparison
with the deferred and preventive maintenance and repairs that generally
get done at annual time.
  #5  
Old May 8th 06, 06:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Higher Cost at Annual:newer ('97-'00) 172R/SP or 1970's 172?

Yes, $15 of maintenance per hour of flight. That would be doing pretty
good. Doesn't include engine or prop reserves.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Naval Air Refueling Needs Deferred in Air Force Tanker Plan Henry J Cobb Military Aviation 47 May 22nd 04 03:36 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 1 January 2nd 04 09:02 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 October 2nd 03 03:07 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 4 August 7th 03 05:12 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.