A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Future of 100LL?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 30th 04, 12:50 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Future of 100LL?

It has been my experience that autogas runs definitely leaner
carburated engines. I know autogas also has a higher specific gravity
- although I don't know the numbers off hand. But it does mean that
the calibration of a carb venturi will change - probably being leaner
for autogas. That you had the greatest problem in the winter, when
the air is most dense, also suggests that your engine was marginally
starving for fuel most of the time for whatever reason. It is
probably also still running lean on avgas.

An earlier post somewhere else accused autogas of causing carb ice
because his engine ran rough unless he used carb heat. I'd bet icing
isn't his issue, as carbs will naturally run richer with a higher carb
air inlet temp. He too was probably marginally lean even with avgas
under most conditions, but that it took carb heat application just got
him to a runable condition with autofuel.

I knew of a freshly overhauled O-300 powered 172 that then required
carb heat on climbout to run smoothly. Everyone assumed it was
somehow icing, but it went less than 100 hours before it burned a
piston from too-lean operation.

After complying with the one-piece venturi AD in our 172M, things were
so lean (especially in the winter) that we had to change the main jet
nozzle to get it to run right. I understand others have reported
problems in this area too.

When an engine is cold, idle operation with autofuel will behave
differently again, with liquid fuel accumulating on the walls of the
intake manifold. This liquid will go into the engine and cause
rich-induced stumbling on power application. The real question for
autogas vs avgas - is the engine operating at a reasonable mixture
over a wide range of air inlet temperatures when warm? What symptoms
can be expected when when the carb is out of a reasonable calibration?

Engine air intake systems are critical, and an engine/carb system that
runs well in one installation won't necessarily run even well in
another.

I'm an advocate of having an EGT (even if only temporary) for any
homebuilt, or any other installation that is showing mixture problems.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is missile defense? An expensive fraud Bush needs Poland as a future nuclear battlefield Paul J. Adam Military Aviation 1 August 9th 04 08:29 PM
Future of 100LL? Michael Owning 0 August 2nd 04 09:29 AM
Future military fighters and guns - yes or no ? championsleeper Military Aviation 77 March 3rd 04 04:11 AM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM
UNMANNED, THE WAY OF THE FUTURE Larry Dighera Piloting 11 November 28th 03 05:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.