A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Future of 100LL?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 2nd 04, 09:29 AM
Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Future of 100LL?

Taylor wrote
You meant retarding the spark for gasoline with lower
anti-knock performance, not advancing it.


I meant dynamic control of the spark advance, such as is normal in
automotive engines. Spark advance refers to how far in advance of TDC
(top dead center) the spark fires. But yes, terminology aside, you
are right - I meant using less spark advance than is common now. And
yes, that will slightly reduce the power output as I mentioned.

By the way aviation gasoline performance numbers (e.g. 100/130, 100LL [which is
really 100/130LL], 80/87) are not directly comparable to automobile pump
anti-knock index (commonly called octane) in the US, which use the R+M/2 method.


This is correct. The reference engine is different. However, the
reference engine for aviation use is also not comparable to modern
aviation engines. In other words, while the numbers are not directly
comparable, they're pretty much equally useful.

Michael
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
100LL "the future looks grim" Cub Driver Piloting 4 August 6th 04 07:07 AM
Future of 100LL? Michael Owning 0 August 2nd 04 09:29 AM
Future of 100LL? [email protected] Piloting 0 July 30th 04 12:50 AM
Future military fighters and guns - yes or no ? championsleeper Military Aviation 77 March 3rd 04 04:11 AM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.