If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Light Electric Rotorcraft
Hi,
I was looking at pictures of Yamaha's recently announced Deinonychus motorbike, and was struck by how functional and light it looked, due to having been designed around electric wheel-motors: http://www.gizmag.com/go/4686/ Somehow this same barebones functional look reminded me a bit of the Mosquito helicopter, also featured on the same site: http://www.gizmag.com/go/4628/ And so it made me wonder whether some of the same elements used to make the Deinonychus motorbike couldn't be rearranged to make a light electric-powered mini-helicopter. Ugh, here's my ascii-art pic ;P --------=======------- | | | | || || _||____ | \ __ / / \ | | \__/ So the top part is the rotor and the = signs are the wheel motor that turns it. Then you have the shaft with the seat coming off near the bottom of it. And the circular shape at the bottom is supposed to be a tire for landing gear, meant to take the main shock of landing, but the pilot's legs are supposed to provide lateral stability on landing and takeoff. Some Segway-style control logic on the bottom wheelmotor could be used to provide stability on the forward-backward axis during landing/takeoff. This would include allowing the swivel-arm, on which the bottom tire is mounted, to move and change its angle. So the tire underneath is supposed to have fan-blades as the spokes, and is spun by its wheelmotor to provide the counter-rotative thrust like a tail-rotor. After takeoff, the swivel arm slowly swivels the tire back and up to position it at the rear. Likewise, during landing approach it swivels down and forward to serve as the Segway-style landing gear. While landing, the wheelmotors will use regenerative braking to stop the rotors as quickly as possible. What do you think? Comments, critiques, suggestions? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
("Morgans" wrote)
My bet is that the batteries will weigh too much, and be too expensive. I HATE being a pessimist! Diesel turning a generator? Montblack |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
wrote Somehow this same barebones functional look reminded me a bit of the Mosquito helicopter, also featured on the same site: I didn't see what the engine was on the heli, but if you know what it is, do some calculations. Figure the wattage for the gas engine heli, then convert it into amp hours for the length of time that you want to fly, then figure out how much weight of batteries you will have to carry. My bet is that the batteries will weigh too much, and be too expensive. I HATE being a pessimist! -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Montblack" wrote Diesel turning a generator? And this is supposed to be saving weight? g Why not just turn the rotor with the diesel? Too obvious? -- Jim in NC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Morgans wrote: wrote SNIP I HATE being a pessimist! -- Jim in NC Then stop. It's a simple 12 step program... :-) -Matt |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
manofsan,
That's an interesting idea. Now put another lifting rotor on top of the main shaft, counter-rotating, and you can forget the tail rotor, with all of its' complexities. Use spider gears idling between the rotors, so both rotors will turn at equal rates, even if one motor fails. Pivot the entire rotorhead like a Benson autogyro, and control that with a joystick. Steer it with a large rudder behind the pilot that can tilt (for yaw axis control in hovering flight) *and* swing left-and-right (for directional control in forward flight). You could do that very simply, with a rudder hinge line angled 45 degrees back from the main rotor shaft, and rudder cables that pull the lower end of the rudder directly. The flight control system at the pilot's position could be identical to an autogyro. You would need rudder pedals, throttle, and joystick only. There would be no cyclic controls, no collective pitch controls, and no tail rotor controls (because there is no tail rotor). This is *much* less machinery than the AirScooter: http://www.gizmag.com/go/3056/ Feed it with fuel cells (aviation ain't cheap). Watch out for birds... Don't forget the BRS :-) http://brsparachutes.com My ASCII art: ____ | | |BRS | \ / counter-rotating || -------------------(motor)-------------------- lift rotors *||* --spider gears -------------------(motor)-------------------- ______||-----\ _____/h\.....|| \ autogyro ( i\....||\ \--joystick ( n\...|| \ \ (rudder g\..|| \seat pedals (__________e\.|| \______ / /----------------------------/--\ / main frame w/fuel cells \ /-----------------------------------\ o O -- (Replies *will* bounce, unless you delete the letter A from my email address) Cheers, Red wrote: I was looking at pictures of Yamaha's recently announced Deinonychus motorbike, and was struck by how functional and light it looked, due to having been designed around electric wheel-motors: http://www.gizmag.com/go/4686/ Somehow this same barebones functional look reminded me a bit of the Mosquito helicopter, also featured on the same site: http://www.gizmag.com/go/4628/ And so it made me wonder whether some of the same elements used to make the Deinonychus motorbike couldn't be rearranged to make a light electric-powered mini-helicopter. Ugh, here's my ascii-art pic ;P --------=======------- | | | | || || _||____ | \ __ / / \ | | \__/ So the top part is the rotor and the = signs are the wheel motor that turns it. Then you have the shaft with the seat coming off near the bottom of it. And the circular shape at the bottom is supposed to be a tire for landing gear, meant to take the main shock of landing, but the pilot's legs are supposed to provide lateral stability on landing and takeoff. Some Segway-style control logic on the bottom wheelmotor could be used to provide stability on the forward-backward axis during landing/takeoff. This would include allowing the swivel-arm, on which the bottom tire is mounted, to move and change its angle. So the tire underneath is supposed to have fan-blades as the spokes, and is spun by its wheelmotor to provide the counter-rotative thrust like a tail-rotor. After takeoff, the swivel arm slowly swivels the tire back and up to position it at the rear. Likewise, during landing approach it swivels down and forward to serve as the Segway-style landing gear. While landing, the wheelmotors will use regenerative braking to stop the rotors as quickly as possible. What do you think? Comments, critiques, suggestions? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Morgans wrote:
"Montblack" wrote Diesel turning a generator? And this is supposed to be saving weight? g Why not just turn the rotor with the diesel? Too obvious? It *might* be possible that diesel-electric system would be lighter than pure electric or pure diesel. A small diesel could be optimised to run continuously at its most economical RPM, producing only a little more electricity than needed to drive the rotor in level flight. For additional power, electricity from the battery would also drive the rotor. When descending, the battery gets charged faster. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Hi red, thanks for the great ideas.
Hmm, I read about how a coax design can use differential rotation speed between the 2 rotors for the purpose of turning the aircraft. That'd be pretty easy to do with a wheelmotor for each rotor. Here's a link to a new kind of wheelmotor which is attracting attention: http://www.wavecrestlabs.com The company is headed by General Wesley Clark, former NATO commander. Regarding portable fuel cell for propulsion, here's another link: http://www.intelligent-energy.com/in...6&artID=3 709 And hydrogen is a lightweight fuel too, for lower fuel load. But suppose you want some extra juice sometimes, for more maneuvering/lifting power. Then use the new Toshiba battery: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0503/05...sh1minbatt.asp It can apparently discharge and absorb energy at a very high rate. This might be useful for using regenerative braking to recover energy from your rotor when you're reducing airspeed/altitude, since a wheelmotor can convert torque/rpm back into electricity. Once you've landed, regenerative braking would allow you to quickly bring the rotors to a stop while recovering energy from them. I'd also imagine the electric motors would be quieter too, so your eardrums don't take a beating. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Light Electric Rotorcraft | [email protected] | Home Built | 21 | October 6th 05 02:58 AM |
HOW MANY GLIDER PILOTS DOES IT TAKE TO CHANGE A LIGHT BULB | Mal | Soaring | 59 | October 4th 05 05:39 AM |
The light bulb | Greasy Rider | Military Aviation | 6 | March 2nd 04 12:07 PM |
OT but very funny after some of the posts we have had of late. | Mycroft | Military Aviation | 1 | August 8th 03 10:09 PM |
Electric whine in the light circuit - Help | Victor J. Osborne, Jr. | Owning | 1 | July 29th 03 11:36 PM |