A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dance on disbaled Bradleys and die!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 13th 04, 07:01 PM
Andrew
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dance on disbaled Bradleys and die!

This is beautiful. People come to celebrate the destruction
of a US military vehicle and they die. In my opinion, if you
dance around in jubilation at such a seen you are declaring
yourself to be an enemy and you invite incoming fire. This
applies to Arab 'journalists' who rush to the scene to gloat.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3652174.stm

Does anyone have the video? (No realvideo format please!)

Andrew
  #2  
Old September 14th 04, 01:56 PM
The Enlightenment
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Andrew" wrote in message
...
This is beautiful. People come to celebrate the destruction
of a US military vehicle and they die. In my opinion, if you
dance around in jubilation at such a seen you are declaring
yourself to be an enemy and you invite incoming fire.


The action of jubilantly standing on a destroyed Bradley to express their
hate for the US occupation forces while the reactive and likely enraged and
fearfull and possibly vengefull collegues of the Bradley crew may be
watching on is a dangerous act bordering on stupidity.

Your pro US opinion is pretty irrelevent. The US stupidly embroiled itself
into a neocon agitated pro israel/zionist war that must inevitably fail as
the Arab and Muslim world reject it. Now Americans must suffer the
consequences.

The US will continue to suffer casualities, growing finacial stress, fear
and loss of freedoms, perhaps indefinetly, as it sinks in relation to the
rising powers of the east and dilutes into an immigration driven ethnic
babel.

As those Reconquista inspired La Razza Mexicans can say with increasing
impuntiy to gringos: Hasta La Vista baby.



This
applies to Arab 'journalists' who rush to the scene to gloat.


He didn't seem to be gloating but was reporting from quite a distance away
that looked like at least 25 meters.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3652174.stm

Does anyone have the video? (No realvideo format please!)

Andrew



  #4  
Old September 14th 04, 10:10 PM
John Mullen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"The Enlightenment" wrote in message
...

"Andrew" wrote in message
...
This is beautiful. People come to celebrate the destruction
of a US military vehicle and they die. In my opinion, if you
dance around in jubilation at such a seen you are declaring
yourself to be an enemy and you invite incoming fire.


The action of jubilantly standing on a destroyed Bradley to express their
hate for the US occupation forces while the reactive and likely enraged
and
fearfull and possibly vengefull collegues of the Bradley crew may be
watching on is a dangerous act bordering on stupidity.

Your pro US opinion is pretty irrelevent. The US stupidly embroiled
itself
into a neocon agitated pro israel/zionist war that must inevitably fail as
the Arab and Muslim world reject it. Now Americans must suffer the
consequences.

The US will continue to suffer casualities, growing finacial stress, fear
and loss of freedoms, perhaps indefinetly, as it sinks in relation to the
rising powers of the east and dilutes into an immigration driven ethnic
babel.

As those Reconquista inspired La Razza Mexicans can say with increasing
impuntiy to gringos: Hasta La Vista baby.



This
applies to Arab 'journalists' who rush to the scene to gloat.


He didn't seem to be gloating but was reporting from quite a distance away
that looked like at least 25 meters.


Agreed. And deliberately targetting civilians is a new low. Each act like
this takes away another possibility that the US invasion force can ever
prevail. Why do they do it?

John


  #5  
Old September 15th 04, 12:19 AM
Scott Ferrin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:10:04 +0100, "John Mullen"
wrote:

"The Enlightenment" wrote in message
...

"Andrew" wrote in message
...
This is beautiful. People come to celebrate the destruction
of a US military vehicle and they die. In my opinion, if you
dance around in jubilation at such a seen you are declaring
yourself to be an enemy and you invite incoming fire.


The action of jubilantly standing on a destroyed Bradley to express their
hate for the US occupation forces while the reactive and likely enraged
and
fearfull and possibly vengefull collegues of the Bradley crew may be
watching on is a dangerous act bordering on stupidity.

Your pro US opinion is pretty irrelevent. The US stupidly embroiled
itself
into a neocon agitated pro israel/zionist war that must inevitably fail as
the Arab and Muslim world reject it. Now Americans must suffer the
consequences.

The US will continue to suffer casualities, growing finacial stress, fear
and loss of freedoms, perhaps indefinetly, as it sinks in relation to the
rising powers of the east and dilutes into an immigration driven ethnic
babel.

As those Reconquista inspired La Razza Mexicans can say with increasing
impuntiy to gringos: Hasta La Vista baby.



This
applies to Arab 'journalists' who rush to the scene to gloat.


He didn't seem to be gloating but was reporting from quite a distance away
that looked like at least 25 meters.


Agreed. And deliberately targetting civilians is a new low. Each act like
this takes away another possibility that the US invasion force can ever
prevail. Why do they do it?



why do they take out those who support the opposition? Gee I don't
know, why do you think?
  #6  
Old September 15th 04, 12:36 AM
John Mullen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:10:04 +0100, "John Mullen"
wrote:

"The Enlightenment" wrote in message
...

"Andrew" wrote in message
...
This is beautiful. People come to celebrate the destruction
of a US military vehicle and they die. In my opinion, if you
dance around in jubilation at such a seen you are declaring
yourself to be an enemy and you invite incoming fire.

The action of jubilantly standing on a destroyed Bradley to express
their
hate for the US occupation forces while the reactive and likely enraged
and
fearfull and possibly vengefull collegues of the Bradley crew may be
watching on is a dangerous act bordering on stupidity.

Your pro US opinion is pretty irrelevent. The US stupidly embroiled
itself
into a neocon agitated pro israel/zionist war that must inevitably fail
as
the Arab and Muslim world reject it. Now Americans must suffer the
consequences.

The US will continue to suffer casualities, growing finacial stress,
fear
and loss of freedoms, perhaps indefinetly, as it sinks in relation to
the
rising powers of the east and dilutes into an immigration driven ethnic
babel.

As those Reconquista inspired La Razza Mexicans can say with increasing
impuntiy to gringos: Hasta La Vista baby.



This
applies to Arab 'journalists' who rush to the scene to gloat.

He didn't seem to be gloating but was reporting from quite a distance
away
that looked like at least 25 meters.


Agreed. And deliberately targetting civilians is a new low. Each act like
this takes away another possibility that the US invasion force can ever
prevail. Why do they do it?



why do they take out those who support the opposition? Gee I don't
know, why do you think?


I think it is because they are stupid and naive. They didn't think through
the post war situation at all. Now the ordinary Iraqis and the troops on the
ground are paying the price.

Killing civilians indiscriminately because you don't like their 'attitude'
takes you to the level of the Nazis in Poland and Russia in WW2. Ask
yourself whether that works in the long term. What do you think?

John


  #7  
Old September 15th 04, 06:52 PM
Matt Wiser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


(Dav1936531) wrote:
From: "The Enlightenment"




"Andrew" wrote:
This applies to Arab 'journalists' who rush

to the scene to gloat.

He didn't seem to be gloating but was reporting

from quite a distance away
that looked like at least 25 meters.

Just an Al-Arabiya reporter detailing the latest
Abu al-Zarqawi "victory" to
propagandize the jihad hungry Arab world, that's
all. The attackers of the
Bradley were supporters of Abu al-Zarqawi who
were hoisting his battle flag
over their "accomplishment" ......knocking out
a Bradley.
SEE the pics:

ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly1.jpg
ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly2.jpg
ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly3.jpg
ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly4.jpg
ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly5.jpg
ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly6.jpg
ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly7.jpg

Looks like someone was getting real time photo
recon of the monkey dance going
on around the Bradley and, when they saw Zarqawi
supporters there, ordered up a
rocket hit to police them up.

Zarqawi IS the face of Al-Qaeda in Iraq and
it IS open season on Al-Qaeda.
Sorry about any collateral damage, but don't
stand next to those Al-Qaeda guys.
They're targets anywhere, anytime.
(previously posted to other thread below)
Dave



I agree with Dave: any member of AQ, anywhere, is fair game. Again, the
collateral damage is regrettable, but if you run alongside AQ, well, when
they get burned, so do you.Sooner or later, Zarquari is going to cross paths
either with a JDAM or LGB, or the SF operators out looking for him. In the
former case, he gets carried out feet first-assuming there's enough left
to carry out; in the latter, whether or not he gets hauled away in cuffs
or in a body bag is his choice. My preference would be the latter, then pay
your informant the $25 million outstanding on his head.And say goodbye and
good riddance. Oh, and put prices on the heads of his followers as well.
Dead or alive; makes no difference to me-so long as they're out of the game-for
good.

Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access!
  #8  
Old September 16th 04, 10:38 PM
Fred the Red Shirt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"The Enlightenment" wrote in message ...
"Andrew" wrote in message
...
This is beautiful. People come to celebrate the destruction
of a US military vehicle and they die. In my opinion, if you
dance around in jubilation at such a seen you are declaring
yourself to be an enemy and you invite incoming fire.


The action of jubilantly standing on a destroyed Bradley to express their
hate for the US occupation forces while the reactive and likely enraged and
fearfull and possibly vengefull collegues of the Bradley crew may be
watching on is a dangerous act bordering on stupidity.

Your pro US opinion is pretty irrelevent.


As a US citizen I object to that characterization.

His expressed opinion is anti-humanity and therefor anti-US. Please
do not tar us all with the same brush.

--

FF
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.