|If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.|
||Thread Tools||Display Modes|
Subject: Gun, machine gun and/or cannon?
From: "The Enlightenment"
Date: 8/22/2004 10:49 PM Pacific Standard Time
Only 3 hits were required to brring down a 4 engined heavy bomber and even a
P47 couldn't survive more than a hit or two. (which made the Me 109 so
deady if it got to within 200m) http://www.luft46.com/armament/mk108.html
During our training in WW II the number of hits to bring down any plane was a
point of important study for us. Bringing down a heavy bomber with three hits
regardless of where it was hit is in itself an unreasonable concept. Studies
showed that an ME 109 would have to put almost 75 hits into a B-17 to bring it
down. The most vulnerable enemy fighter was the Jap zero (after the JU 87) and
it needed 12 hite to bring it down.
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post||MrHabilis||Home Built||0||June 11th 04 05:07 PM|
|Democracy Expires||Grantland||Military Aviation||14||March 8th 04 05:54 AM|
|Titor's Time Machine... USAF Missile Box???||Jason Strong||Military Aviation||8||November 28th 03 01:51 AM|
|marlin aerial machine gun spad?||old hoodoo||Military Aviation||0||August 10th 03 09:06 PM|
|Machine Tool Co. Bankruptcy Sends Ripple Through JSF Program||huuto||Military Aviation||3||July 29th 03 05:59 AM|