If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"karl" wrote in message ...
John, Cub-Crafter Super Cubs are brand new airplanes, with brand new data plates and brand new log books. Nothing comes off a donor airplane. Nothing. http://www.pipercubforum.com/topcub.htm Very interesting. In their earlier days, Cub-Crafters used to do what they called a total restoration, which amounted to building you a brand new plane on which they affixed your data plate. Now it seems they're building Cubs from scratch. I wonder how they get away with that, since New Piper obviously doesn't want them to. The website said : "The FAA has so far sided with Mr. Richmond, approving the Top Cubs under a regulation that allows anybody to build any civilian aircraft, as long as it meets the original design. " Does this mean I could start building and selling Cherokees in my garage and Piper couldn't stop me??? Apparently so. Very strange indeed. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) Best, Karl |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"John Galban" wrote in message om... "The FAA has so far sided with Mr. Richmond, approving the Top Cubs under a regulation that allows anybody to build any civilian aircraft, as long as it meets the original design. " Does this mean I could start building and selling Cherokees in my garage and Piper couldn't stop me??? Apparently so. There's no enforceable intellectual property on the cub (save maybe the cub trademark). The certification approval is at the FAA's discretion, but hey if it's identical to the previously approved design, what justification is there in declining that CC's cubs are any different than Pipers? Presumably CC has gotten independent manufacturing authority (Piper's would come under the type certificate), but that's a lot less effort than certificating a new design. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
What I don't understand is what sort of certification tag the FAA is giving the Cub Crafters Top Cubs. It can't be a Super Cub, but yet it is a certified aircraft. So what is it? It is 100% certain that Piper will be sued when some bone head crashes one after running it out of gas or crashes into a mountain at night in fog. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Guy Byars wrote: What I don't understand is what sort of certification tag the FAA is giving the Cub Crafters Top Cubs. It can't be a Super Cub, but yet it is a certified aircraft. So what is it? It is 100% certain that Piper will be sued when some bone head crashes one after running it out of gas or crashes into a mountain at night in fog. Well since some have crashed, with fatalities, it's safe to say you don't know what you are talking about. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"Newps" wrote in message news:sqkMb.26871$na.20763@attbi_s04... Guy Byars wrote: What I don't understand is what sort of certification tag the FAA is giving the Cub Crafters Top Cubs. It can't be a Super Cub, but yet it is a certified aircraft. So what is it? It is 100% certain that Piper will be sued when some bone head crashes one after running it out of gas or crashes into a mountain at night in fog. Well since some have crashed, with fatalities, it's safe to say you don't know what you are talking about. You missed his tongue-in-cheek remark. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, that is what it means... They could not stop you if the FAA signs off
that your produced aircraft meets the original certified drawings and gives you a production certificate... It is not strange to those of us who have taken the time to understand the regulations - and to those who have to make unavailable parts for their aircraft... Further, New Piper shot itself in the foot by publically saying they will NEVER again produce the Cub, alerting the feds to an orphaned airplane... Cub Crafters had established a history and reputation for credibility with the FAA beginning in the rebuild area and then became the source of technical and engineering knowledge about Cubs by getting PMA for all the parts... The step from supplying approved replacements for every part on the Cub, to simply assembling a totally new airplane from a pile of these parts, was a very small step... Denny "John Galban" wrote in message Does this mean I could start building and selling Cherokees in my garage and Piper couldn't stop me??? Apparently so. Very strange indeed. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New aviation history interview: Fokker/Curtiss/Messerschmitt ace Mauno Fräntilä | Jukka O. Kauppinen | Military Aviation | 0 | September 22nd 04 11:18 PM |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |
Aviation Insurance History, data, records? | cloudclimbr | General Aviation | 0 | February 17th 04 03:36 AM |
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements | me | Military Aviation | 146 | January 15th 04 10:13 PM |
FS: Aviation History Books | Neil Cournoyer | Military Aviation | 0 | August 26th 03 08:32 PM |