If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Will cheaper motorgliders increase the number of soaring pilots?
We were suffering severe thread drift, so I pulled this out of the pile...
Kirk Stant wrote: I'd guess if/when you get that Antares, you'll find whatever you fly now, collecting dust. Good point (and all of this discussion is fun - "devil's advocate" stuff at times. You may be right that if I had a self launch my pure glider would gather dust - I would probably trade it for a really nice 1-26 (with an open canopy) and a Swift for acro. Different tools for different jobs. Now you're talking! A common situation in England and Europe, I've read, where a pilot might have shares in several quite different gliders. But I'm not sure about self-launching being the way to grow the sport, purely on a cost basis. I could afford half of a cherry LS6, and have flown it about 200 hours a year ever since I got it. There is absolutely no way I can pony up to the equivalent self launcher (lottery excepted, of course!). Cost is the big problem, for sure. If adding a motor cost only $5000 instead of $25-$30,000, almost everyone would have one. THe cost can be reduced considerably by getting a medium (30 to 38:1) performance motorglider. Look at how popular the Russia AC-5M was when it was available. It can be cut in half by getting a partner, and the increased utility of the motorglider (see Steve Hill's posting) means both partners can get almost as much flying in as they would owning it by themselves. How many newbies are going to take that first jump? I believe there is a class of newbies that would take that jump: power pilots transitioning to gliders. Here's why: * they already expect an aircraft to cost a lot * they will think the maintenance costs for a motorglider are insignificant compared to their airplane costs * they are more likely to use partnerships, reducing the cost further * they value independence, being able to fly on their schedule and from an airport of their choosing * they dislike the idea of landing out, both emotionally (it sort of seems like a "crash") and it's inconvenient retrieve * in-air restarts give them a chance to learn soaring skills their transition training only hinted at during their short training time (compared to a student without a previous license) * a bias towards "gotta have high performance" (40:1) hasn't been implanted yet, again due to their much shorter time in the sport. To an airplane pilot, even 20:1 seems amazing, and 30:1 or more just incredible There are hundreds of thousands of power pilots in the USA, and a lot of them are attracted to the idea of soaring, but the perceived hassles keep them from pursuing it. A moderate performance, moderately priced motorglider might be just what it takes to get them into the sport! (Robert, feel free to step in here) -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
P-3C Ditches with Four Engines Out, All Survive! | Scet | Military Aviation | 6 | September 27th 04 01:09 AM |
p3/95 | [email protected] | Military Aviation | 1 | September 27th 04 12:27 AM |
Stop The Noise petitions FAA to increase N number size | Earl Grieda | Piloting | 19 | April 26th 04 04:46 AM |
Motorgliders (long) | JJ Sinclair | Soaring | 98 | October 9th 03 10:11 PM |