A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

C182 / SMA Jet Fuel Engine?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 27th 05, 11:38 AM
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default C182 / SMA Jet Fuel Engine?

Is there any information available about the new SMA jet fuel engines
that are being offered for the C182?

I'm curious if maintenance would be much of an issue. Are there many
shops that can handle working on them?

Is it a replace only like the Centurion 1.7 on the Diamond airplanes?
Or can it be overhauled to get flying again?

Cost for an annual?

How would they perform at high altitudes? - Colorado rockies region for
example.

Any way lots of questions so if any one knows where I might be able to
find information it would sure be appreciated. I've already checked the
www.smaengines.com web site and it is just a little light on
information.

Thanks

  #2  
Old September 28th 05, 05:48 PM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike,

Is there any information available about the new SMA jet fuel engines
that are being offered for the C182?


They are? Actually being offered, I mean. Not just written about.


I'm curious if maintenance would be much of an issue. Are there many
shops that can handle working on them?


I don't know of any kind of maintenance network - quite contrary to the
Centurions.


Is it a replace only like the Centurion 1.7 on the Diamond airplanes?
Or can it be overhauled to get flying again?


I think I read about overhauls.

I've already checked the
www.smaengines.com web site and it is just a little light on
information.


There might be a reason...


--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #3  
Old September 30th 05, 01:14 AM
NW_PILOT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

it's just a Diesel Engine


"Mike" wrote in message
ups.com...
Is there any information available about the new SMA jet fuel engines
that are being offered for the C182?

I'm curious if maintenance would be much of an issue. Are there many
shops that can handle working on them?

Is it a replace only like the Centurion 1.7 on the Diamond airplanes?
Or can it be overhauled to get flying again?

Cost for an annual?

How would they perform at high altitudes? - Colorado rockies region for
example.

Any way lots of questions so if any one knows where I might be able to
find information it would sure be appreciated. I've already checked the
www.smaengines.com web site and it is just a little light on
information.

Thanks



  #4  
Old September 30th 05, 03:48 AM
George Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike wrote:

Is there any information available about the new SMA jet fuel engines
that are being offered for the C182?


Prowl around http://www.smaengines.com .

I'm curious if maintenance would be much of an issue. Are there many
shops that can handle working on them?


Not in the U.S.. There's only one or two 182s flying with that engine in the
States. The French STC was granted only last July, and the company doesn't
expect the FAA to grant an STC until later this year.

Is it a replace only like the Centurion 1.7 on the Diamond airplanes?
Or can it be overhauled to get flying again?


They're targeting a 3,000 hour TBO. Since they use the term TBO, not TBR, it
seems the company intends to support overhauls.

Cost for an annual?


As much as you have. :-)
Seriously, SMA claims maintenance costs will be lower than gas. Since that tends
to be true of diesels, they're probably right.

How would they perform at high altitudes? - Colorado rockies region for
example.


Should be about the same as a turbocharged gas engine of similar torque.

George Patterson
Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your neighbor.
It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him.
  #5  
Old September 30th 05, 07:02 AM
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

("George Patterson" wrote)
[snip]
Is there any information available about the new SMA jet fuel engines
that are being offered for the C182?


Prowl around http://www.smaengines.com .



For others, more than for the OP, who already knows this:.

http://www.centurion-engines.com/c17/c17_retro.htm
295 lb engine (incl. all accessories for operation)

Looks like FAA approval 'for all, not just a few' is just around the
corner - maybe.

http://www.dieselair.com/
Found this too


Montblack

  #6  
Old September 30th 05, 10:06 AM
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

After a bit more digging here is some more information I have found:

Current cost of the C182Q kit is about $77K soon to be
reduced by "at least $10K" so around $67K

Installation, at the dealer I contacted, runs about $9K.
Or about 120-hrs @ $75/hr.

So the installed price should be about $76K. Which
includes almost everything from the firewall forward.


"Normal" recurring maintenance is expected to be:
100 hour oil changes.
200 hour fuel filter change and glow plug inspection.
500 hour compression check
With estimated time at 3~5 hrs.

Annuals were - Quote:
"Your overall annual inspection will be much
less then an avgas engine by virtue of the
fact that the engine contains 70% less parts
and therefore there is virtually nothing left
to change out or replace."
So how much that will really mean ... ?

Overhaul is estimated to run around $24K+ based
on the 3000-hr TBO. So in the perfect world, I
could either do 2 "cheaper" overhauls on the
SMC or 3 regular overhauls on a Lyc or 3+ on
a TCM engine over a 6000hr life.

If you look at burning less cheaper (if available) JetA fuel than avgas
over the life of the TBO. Might save a few bucks. Also saving on price
of a few other pieces and parts (sparkplugs, etc.) there might be a few
more bucks saved. And starting off with a new prop.

So since I am rather new at this how much does an overhaul on a regular
avgas burning C182 engine run?

It almost looks like it might be something to look a little closer at.

???

  #7  
Old September 30th 05, 02:59 PM
xyzzy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike wrote:


So since I am rather new at this how much does an overhaul on a regular
avgas burning C182 engine run?


The current Aviation Consumer magazine has an article about the SMA 182.
They also did a general review of 182 series in May quoted overhaul
cost of $17K for the continentals and $23K for the Lycs.
--
"You can support the troops but not the president"
--Representative Tom Delay (R-TX), during the Kosovo war.

  #8  
Old September 30th 05, 06:51 PM
George Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike wrote:

Annuals were - Quote:
"Your overall annual inspection will be much
less then an avgas engine by virtue of the
fact that the engine contains 70% less parts
and therefore there is virtually nothing left
to change out or replace."
So how much that will really mean ... ?


Probably this. The annual inspection on a gas engine is basically to run a
compression test, clean and rotate the plugs, check and adjust the ignition
timing, and check the air filter. All shops in this area also change the oil and
filter, though the FAA doesn't require it. Of course, an AD check is also run.

I would bet that the inspection for the diesel will involve running a
compression test (whether it's been 500 hours or not), cleaning the glow plugs,
checking the air filter, and changing the oil and filter. Plus an AD check. That
basically will save you the cost of the magneto work (since there aren't any).
The time needed to check the glow plugs will also be less than messing around
with 8 spark plugs.

Now, if the FAA will allow owners/operators to actually follow the 100, 200, and
500 hour inspection periods recommended by the manufacturer, you would see a
*big* decrease in costs, but I bet they won't.

George Patterson
Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your neighbor.
It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him.
  #9  
Old September 30th 05, 08:36 PM
NW_PILOT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:rI1%e.17210$L15.10478@trndny01...
Mike wrote:

Is there any information available about the new SMA jet fuel engines
that are being offered for the C182?


Prowl around http://www.smaengines.com .

I'm curious if maintenance would be much of an issue. Are there many
shops that can handle working on them?


Not in the U.S.. There's only one or two 182s flying with that engine in

the
States. The French STC was granted only last July, and the company doesn't
expect the FAA to grant an STC until later this year.

Is it a replace only like the Centurion 1.7 on the Diamond airplanes?
Or can it be overhauled to get flying again?


They're targeting a 3,000 hour TBO. Since they use the term TBO, not TBR,

it
seems the company intends to support overhauls.

Cost for an annual?


As much as you have. :-)
Seriously, SMA claims maintenance costs will be lower than gas. Since that

tends
to be true of diesels, they're probably right.

How would they perform at high altitudes? - Colorado rockies region for
example.


Should be about the same as a turbocharged gas engine of similar torque.

George Patterson
Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your

neighbor.
It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him.


Yea, and put a turbo on that Diesel Engine get better performance and better
fuel economy


  #10  
Old September 30th 05, 08:45 PM
NW_PILOT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You forgot about the fuel injection system inspection? Injectors fail become
leaky or clogged


"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:lWe%e.22$DO2.21@trndny06...
Mike wrote:

Annuals were - Quote:
"Your overall annual inspection will be much
less then an avgas engine by virtue of the
fact that the engine contains 70% less parts
and therefore there is virtually nothing left
to change out or replace."
So how much that will really mean ... ?


Probably this. The annual inspection on a gas engine is basically to run a
compression test, clean and rotate the plugs, check and adjust the

ignition
timing, and check the air filter. All shops in this area also change the

oil and
filter, though the FAA doesn't require it. Of course, an AD check is also

run.

I would bet that the inspection for the diesel will involve running a
compression test (whether it's been 500 hours or not), cleaning the glow

plugs,
checking the air filter, and changing the oil and filter. Plus an AD

check. That
basically will save you the cost of the magneto work (since there aren't

any).
The time needed to check the glow plugs will also be less than messing

around
with 8 spark plugs.

Now, if the FAA will allow owners/operators to actually follow the 100,

200, and
500 hour inspection periods recommended by the manufacturer, you would see

a
*big* decrease in costs, but I bet they won't.

George Patterson
Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your

neighbor.
It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Time, running out of fuel and fuel gauges Dylan Smith Piloting 29 February 3rd 08 07:04 PM
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
"Out of fuel, out of hope: 'Help, I'm in the water'" [email protected] Piloting 145 May 3rd 05 11:21 PM
Is Your Airplane Susceptible To Mis Fu eling? A Simple Test For Fuel Contamination. Nathan Young Piloting 4 June 14th 04 06:13 PM
What if the germans... Charles Gray Military Aviation 119 January 26th 04 11:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.