If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Awesome moonscape
Is that what Hitler's brown-nosed minions think is always the answer
to everything that rocks your mainstream status quo boat? (drugs?) Why don't you just tell us why those NASA/Apollo EVA Kodak moments were not the least bit bluish? - Brad Guth wrote: On Dec 18, 4:44 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed- Why was that NASA/Apollomoonnever once as having been recorded by those unfiltered optics and upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as depicting thatmoonas not hardly the least bit physically dark or much less of any bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/ purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and China are recording? Another literary masterpiece. The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't you two start a thread about it? Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge of our mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off that hocus-pocus space race, actually still that deathly afraid of sharing the truth? (apparently so) Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it. What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the space race? Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate usenet whackjob. AKA "k00k" -c See what I mean. (obviously not) Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of Apollo folks were hiding Venus? Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollo moon wasn't hardly ever physically dark or otherwise the least bit blue within any of those unfiltered Kodak moments? - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Can you explain to us why you aren't taking the meds that your psychiatrist prescribed for you? As for Venus, they hid it up their sleeves. That is a standard slight of hand, even in space... or maybe, just maybe, Venus was never in view when those photos were taken... naw, no matter which way you look on the moon, you should ALWAYS see Venus, right? Face it, Neil Armstrong walked on the moon. You can pretend it never happened, and try to come up with all kinds of wacky reaons why it didn't, but you are simply wrong, and a nutjob at that. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Awesome moonscape
On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps wrote:
On Dec 19, 12:44 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed- Why was that NASA/Apollomoonnever once as having been recorded by those unfiltered optics and upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as depicting thatmoonas not hardly the least bit physically dark or much less of any bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/ purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and China are recording? Another literary masterpiece. The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't you two start a thread about it? Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge of our mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off that hocus-pocus space race, actually still that deathly afraid of sharing the truth? (apparently so) Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it. What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the space race? Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate usenet whackjob. AKA "k00k" -c See what I mean. (obviously not) Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of Apollo folks were hiding Venus? Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollomoonwasn't hardly ever physically dark or otherwise the least bit blue within any of those unfiltered Kodak moments? - Brad Guth No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typicalmoonexposure wouldn't capture Venus as themoonsurface is too bright and the film latitude too narrow. Second the hint of blue (and yellow and red) in themoonis so slight you need digital photography and image processing to pull it out. I know, I've done it. Cheers Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do all Yids lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code? - Brad Guth |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Awesome moonscape
On Dec 19, 9:00 am, wrote:
On Dec 18, 6:58 pm, WingFlaps wrote: On Dec 19, 12:44 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed- Why was that NASA/Apollomoonnever once as having been recorded by those unfiltered optics and upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as depicting thatmoonas not hardly the least bit physically dark or much less of any bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/ purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and China are recording? Another literary masterpiece. The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't you two start a thread about it? Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge of our mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off that hocus-pocus space race, actually still that deathly afraid of sharing the truth? (apparently so) Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it. What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the space race? Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate usenet whackjob. AKA "k00k" -c See what I mean. (obviously not) Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of Apollo folks were hiding Venus? Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollomoonwasn't hardly ever physically dark or otherwise the least bit blue within any of those unfiltered Kodak moments? - Brad Guth No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typicalmoonexposure wouldn't capture Venus as themoonsurface is too bright and the film latitude too narrow. Second the hint of blue (and yellow and red) in themoonis so slight you need digital photography and image processing to pull it out. I know, I've done it. Cheers- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not to mention the fact that Venus is where? CLOSE TO THE SUN!!! Who is going to point their camera toward the sun on themoon? Talk about lens flare! The only reason we can see Venus on the earth is because the sun is below the horizon. Two silly Yids of a feather? - Brad Guth |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Awesome moonscape
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:01:30 -0800 (PST), BradGuth wrote:
Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do all Yids lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code? *yawn* We've already got a much better troll than you here. -- Dallas |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Awesome moonscape
On Dec 21, 6:01 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps wrote: On Dec 19, 12:44 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed- Why was that NASA/Apollomoonnever once as having been recorded by those unfiltered optics and upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as depicting thatmoonas not hardly the least bit physically dark or much less of any bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/ purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and China are recording? Another literary masterpiece. The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't you two start a thread about it? Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge of our mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off that hocus-pocus space race, actually still that deathly afraid of sharing the truth? (apparently so) Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it. What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the space race? Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate usenet whackjob. AKA "k00k" -c See what I mean. (obviously not) Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of Apollo folks were hiding Venus? Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollomoonwasn't hardly ever physically dark or otherwise the least bit blue within any of those unfiltered Kodak moments? - Brad Guth No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typicalmoonexposure wouldn't capture Venus as themoonsurface is too bright and the film latitude too narrow. Second the hint of blue (and yellow and red) in themoonis so slight you need digital photography and image processing to pull it out. I know, I've done it. Cheers Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do all Yids lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code? - Brad Guth What a sad little man you are. Cheers |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Awesome moonscape
On Dec 21, 12:51 am, WingFlaps wrote:
On Dec 21, 6:01 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps wrote: On Dec 19, 12:44 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed- Why was that NASA/Apollo moon ever once as having been recorded by those unfiltered optics and upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as depicting that moon as not hardly the least bit physically dark or much less of any bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/ purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and China are recording? Another literary masterpiece. The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't you two start a thread about it? Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge of our mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off that hocus-pocus space race, actually still that deathly afraid of sharing the truth? (apparently so) Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it. What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the space race? Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate usenet whackjob. AKA "k00k" -c See what I mean. (obviously not) Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of Apollo folks were hiding Venus? Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollo moon wasn't hardly ever physically dark or otherwise the least bit blue within any of those unfiltered Kodak moments? - Brad Guth No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typical moon exposure wouldn't capture Venus as the moon surface is too bright and the film latitude too narrow. Second the hint of blue (and yellow and red) in the moon is so slight you need digital photography and image processing to pull it out. I know, I've done it. Cheers Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do all Yids lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code? - Brad Guth What a sad little man you are. Cheers Are you silly folks suggesting that Muslims are the ones in charge of all the bad stuff associated with our MI5/CIA and of their NASA/Apollo cloak and dagger fiasco of our mutually perpetrated cold war(s)? That must also be why you pretend atheist folks keep running those key words together with whatever adjoining words all the time. Sadly, it's called mainstream status quo damage control. - Brad Guth |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Awesome moonscape
On Dec 20, 9:35 pm, Dallas wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:01:30 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth wrote: Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do all Yids lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code? *yawn* We've already got a much better troll than you here. -- Dallas Gee Whiz, why don't you folks want to keep impressing us trolls with all of your superior expertise about our blue moon? What's the matter with your 3D interactive orbital simulators? - Brad Guth |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Awesome moonscape
BradGuth wrote:
Are you silly folks suggesting that Muslims are the ones in charge of all the bad stuff associated with our MI5/CIA and of their NASA/Apollo cloak and dagger fiasco of our mutually perpetrated cold war(s)? That must also be why you pretend atheist folks keep running those key words together with whatever adjoining words all the time. Sadly, it's called mainstream status quo damage control. - Brad Guth Don't you find it awkward to type while you're masterbating? I mean there has to be some reason for the blood to drain from your little punk brain to have these hallucinations..... You'll go blind you know! |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Awesome moonscape
BradGuth wrote:
Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do all Yids lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code? - Brad Guth Yids? Really? At least you could come up with a more up-to-date way to show that you are a racist moron. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Awesome moonscape
Gig601XLBuilder wrote:
BradGuth wrote: Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do all Yids lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code? - Brad Guth Yids? Really? At least you could come up with a more up-to-date way to show that you are a racist moron. Brad must have gotten tired of being spanked on sci.physics where he is a well known babbling kook racist. Perhaps he feels he will fair better in a group not heavy with Phd's who pronounce him a drooling idiot. Though it hardly takes a Phd to recognize that... -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
awesome job board | UserName2 | Piloting | 1 | July 25th 07 02:57 AM |
Awesome | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | May 31st 07 10:41 AM |
An Awesome Website!!! | No Name | Aviation Photos | 2 | February 22nd 07 09:22 AM |
Awesome! | Flyingmonk | Piloting | 4 | May 13th 06 06:59 PM |
Awesome chopper! | toadmonkey | Rotorcraft | 1 | July 16th 03 09:46 AM |