A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

V-4 Missile Possibilities



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old January 8th 04, 03:44 AM
steve gallacci
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Not possible at all at that time. The V-1 (aka Fi-103, FZG-76) took
years to develop. Rheinbote was started in 1943. One is a short range
artillery rocket, the other a long range flying bomb meant to hit
Sweden. There's no comparison between the two other than you thinking
it is a derivative of the Rheinbote due to (I assume) general
appearance without the ramjet. BTW, an engineer cannot simply strap on
an experimental ramjet onto a Rheinbote-like missile, add wings, and
hope it makes it to Sweden.


No, but they could strap on a ram jet and wings to see how much range
they could get, and develop from there. Considering how much impulse
they got out of the first stage of the Rheinbote, I'm suprised there
wasn't more R&D done with the system. Using a ramjet instead of another
stage or two(or three) would seem to be a logical growth direction. And
the arti guys were no entirely unaware of ramjets, with the R&D done
with ramjet shells and such.

But to have this "V-4" spring up out of nowhere, without any R&D trail
or name attached to its manufacture seems a bit iffy. If it was purpose
designed, then why not a better configuration? A better length/diameter
ratio or tapered rear fuselage would have been obvious. Now, a lack of
taper could be to accommodate a tail mounted rocket motor to supplement
the catapult and rato strap ons. But unless the was based on something
else, the length/diameter ratio seems off.

On Misdroy they had catapults aimed
towards Sweden, not the West. The ramps were for the V-4. Misdroy was
also the testing ground for the long-range V-3 weapon which fired
shells at Luxembourg. The Rheinbote, OTOH, was made by
Rheinmetall-Borsig and used to shell Antwerp in Nov '44- 220 being
fired. Its maximum range was 135 miles. No Rheinbote was on Misdroy.
Misdroy was the testing ground for long-range missiles and shells.


Where was "Misdroy"? My refs mention it too, but can't find it on a map.


For that matter, the "V-4" was likely little more than a vaporware
threat rather than a credible piece of hardware.


It wouldn't make any sense to threaten a neutral nation like Sweden
with a non-existant weapon in 1945 with the Allies closing in on
Germany. If you remember postwar it was Sweden that complained about
the "Ghost Rockets" coming from the same region. Most "Ghost Rockets"
were described as long cigar-shaped burning objects. These were
suspected of being Russian modified extended-body V-1s but looking at
the V-4... it looks like a strong possibility, especially if a Swede
saw it from below, the ramjet unseen burning above the body.

I don't know about "ghost rockets" but at least one A-4 ended up in that
direction. But in general, the whole threaten Sweden things soulds more
than a bit iffy, and given the nature of the time, Germany did have all
kinds of scary things so even a bluff would have had weight, on the one
hand, and on the other, the Swedes would have known that the German's
days were numbered and even a wonder weapon threat would have seemed a
bit toothless.
Even if some kind of launch rig was built, that doesn't mean there as
anything to launch, other than, perhaps, more V-1s.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Australia to participate in US missile defence program David Bromage Military Aviation 40 December 13th 03 01:52 PM
AIM-54 Phoenix missile Sujay Vijayendra Military Aviation 89 November 3rd 03 09:47 PM
Poland: French Missile Report Was Wrong Michael Petukhov Military Aviation 8 October 7th 03 10:54 PM
Surface to Air Missile threat PlanetJ Instrument Flight Rules 1 August 14th 03 02:13 PM
Rafael's AIM-AIR IR Missile Countermeasure JT Military Aviation 8 July 13th 03 03:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.