A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Flight Levels??



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 7th 05, 11:05 PM
Chuck Dreier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flight Levels??

I just returned on a flight from San Juan to Orlando and our flight level
was 300, including a portion over the mainland. Since then I've been
listening to my aircraft radio and routinely hear flights assigned FL320,
340, etc.. It was always 2000 feet separation with levels 290, 310, 330,
350, 370, etc. What has changed, and when did it change? Thanks!


  #2  
Old February 7th 05, 11:07 PM
James M. Knox
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Chuck Dreier" wrote in
nk.net:

I just returned on a flight from San Juan to Orlando and our flight
level was 300, including a portion over the mainland. Since then I've
been listening to my aircraft radio and routinely hear flights
assigned FL320, 340, etc.. It was always 2000 feet separation with
levels 290, 310, 330, 350, 370, etc. What has changed, and when did
it change? Thanks!


What has changes is RVSM (Reduced Vertical Separation Minimums). Rules
went into effect just a few weeks ago (if I recall correctly). Aircraft
not in compliance with the new rules are restricted to something like FL290
and below.

jmk
  #3  
Old February 7th 05, 11:12 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chuck Dreier" wrote in message
nk.net...

I just returned on a flight from San Juan to Orlando and our flight level
was 300, including a portion over the mainland. Since then I've been
listening to my aircraft radio and routinely hear flights assigned FL320,
340, etc.. It was always 2000 feet separation with levels 290, 310, 330,
350, 370, etc. What has changed, and when did it change? Thanks!


Domestic RVSM, Reduced Vertical Separation Minimums, was implemented last
month. Properly equipped airplanes between FL 290 and FL 410 are now
separated by 1000 feet.


  #4  
Old February 7th 05, 11:16 PM
Chuck Dreier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks JMK...

I just found this information on the Internet:

a.. The implementation date/time is January 20, 2005 at 0901 UTC.


a.. On the same date and time and at the same flight levels, Canada and
Mexico will implement RVSM. Canada implemented RVSM in its Northern Domestic
Airspace in April 2002 and plans to expand RVSM into Canadian Southern
Domestic Airspace in January 2005.


a.. The RVSM program enables vertical separation to be reduced between FL
290-410 (inclusive) from 2,000 ft. to 1,000 ft. RVSM was first implemented
in North Atlantic Airspace in 1997. It is now implemented in other major
airspaces such as Europe, the Pacific Ocean and Australia.


a.. The goal of DRVSM is to provide user and provider benefits in domestic
U.S. operations that have been enjoyed since 1997 in other world airspaces.
RVSM makes six additional flight levels available for operations between FL
290-410. It has been show to: enhance aircraft operating efficiency by
making more fuel/time efficient flight levels available; enhance air traffic
control flexibility and provide the potential for enhanced enroute airspace
capacity


"James M. Knox" wrote in message
2...
"Chuck Dreier" wrote in
nk.net:

I just returned on a flight from San Juan to Orlando and our flight
level was 300, including a portion over the mainland. Since then I've
been listening to my aircraft radio and routinely hear flights
assigned FL320, 340, etc.. It was always 2000 feet separation with
levels 290, 310, 330, 350, 370, etc. What has changed, and when did
it change? Thanks!


What has changes is RVSM (Reduced Vertical Separation Minimums). Rules
went into effect just a few weeks ago (if I recall correctly). Aircraft
not in compliance with the new rules are restricted to something like
FL290
and below.

jmk



  #5  
Old February 12th 05, 04:14 PM
KH
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chuck,
Reduced vertical separation minimum (RVSM) rules were implemented
between FL290 and FL410 on January 20 this year. Hence, a few more
layers on the sandwich ...

KH

http://www.faa.gov/ats/ato/rvsm1.htm



-------------------------------
To email me directly, remove my aging brain.

  #6  
Old February 12th 05, 06:38 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



KH wrote:

Chuck,
Reduced vertical separation minimum (RVSM) rules were implemented
between FL290 and FL410 on January 20 this year. Hence, a few more
layers on the sandwich ...


And if your plane is not RVSM capable you are not allowed to use any
flight level between 290 and 410. You can transition from one to the
other but you can't stay level.
  #7  
Old February 14th 05, 04:34 PM
Will Rogers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:38:36 -0700, Newps wrote:

And if your plane is not RVSM capable you are not allowed to use any
flight level between 290 and 410. You can transition from one to the
other but you can't stay level.


Well, almost. There are four exceptions which can (but not SHALL) be
approved in RVSM airspace (from FL290-FL410). They a
1) Lifeguard,
2) Military,
3) RVSM and manufacturer certification flights, and
4) Foreign state aircraft.

I have so far (since January 20th) seen one Lifeguard and one Military
aircraft cleared to remain at flight levels in Non-RVSM airspace;
however, neither one of them remained there long as the receiving
sector elected not to accept them at those altitudes.

Also, you CAN be cleared for *brief* level flight in Non-RVSM
airspace, but only for separation and not (for instance) to burn off
fuel.

regards,
Will Rogers (Atlanta Center)


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights Geoffrey Sinclair Military Aviation 3 September 4th 09 06:31 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP vvcd Home Built 0 September 22nd 04 07:16 PM
100 years of flight - Special coverage by The Cincinnati Enquirer Garrison Hilliard Military Aviation 1 March 14th 04 02:42 PM
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk Jehad Internet Military Aviation 0 February 7th 04 04:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.