Things I Would Like To See

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in
:

On May 2, 1:51*pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote
innews:2bf535e9-1694-402e-9768-7
:

Who's talking about yank and bank?

Oh, wait, it's you.

When I speak with the examiners I use I hear all the time that they
want stabliized approaches. They don't want much maneuvering below a
certain altitude (usually 500 feet). When I learned in the Aeronca
landing meant power to idle abeam, full slip around the turn to final
and be on the ground within seconds. That is yank-n-bank and will
never pass today.

So, that's your definition of a non-stabilised approach?

Good grief.

I know of at least one examiner who would certainly pass that,
especially if it were done in a champ, but that isn't what I was talking
about in any case.





Bertie.

On May 1, 1:37*pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
gatt wrote :

seen a jet blow started! They parked another jet in fornt of it and
wound it up with the exhaust of the airplane in front.

Bertie

No, you read that in the book "Right Stuff".

-Robert

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in
:

On May 1, 1:37*pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
gatt wrote
innews:166dndmr7PzkuIfVnZ2dnUVZ_g2dn
:

seen a jet blow started! They parked another jet in fornt of it and
wound it up with the exhaust of the airplane in front.

Bertie

No, you read that in the book "Right Stuff".

-Robert



No, I didn't read the right stuff. I saw a 737 park in front of a 707
and do just that in Maidugari.



Bertie

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in
:

On May 2, 1:51 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote
innews:2bf535e9-1694-402e-9768-7
:

Who's talking about yank and bank?

Oh, wait, it's you.

When I speak with the examiners I use I hear all the time that they
want stabliized approaches. They don't want much maneuvering below a
certain altitude (usually 500 feet). When I learned in the Aeronca
landing meant power to idle abeam, full slip around the turn to final
and be on the ground within seconds. That is yank-n-bank and will
never pass today.

So, that's your definition of a non-stabilised approach?

Good grief.

I know of at least one examiner who would certainly pass that,
especially if it were done in a champ, but that isn't what I was talking
about in any case.





Bertie.


You're a liar.

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in
:

On May 1, 1:37 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
gatt wrote
innews:166dndmr7PzkuIfVnZ2dnUVZ_g2dn
:

seen a jet blow started! They parked another jet in fornt of it and
wound it up with the exhaust of the airplane in front.

Bertie

No, you read that in the book "Right Stuff".

-Robert



No, I didn't read the right stuff. I saw a 737 park in front of a 707
and do just that in Maidugari.



Bertie

Still lying.

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:rLZSj.69482$y05.27329
@newsfe22.lga:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in
:

On May 2, 1:51 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote
innews:2bf535e9-1694-402e-9768-7
:

Who's talking about yank and bank?

Oh, wait, it's you.

When I speak with the examiners I use I hear all the time that they
want stabliized approaches. They don't want much maneuvering below a
certain altitude (usually 500 feet). When I learned in the Aeronca
landing meant power to idle abeam, full slip around the turn to
final
and be on the ground within seconds. That is yank-n-bank and will
never pass today.

So, that's your definition of a non-stabilised approach?

Good grief.

I know of at least one examiner who would certainly pass that,
especially if it were done in a champ, but that isn't what I was
talking
about in any case.





Bertie.


You're a liar.




No i'm not.


Bertie

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:ILZSj.69483$y05.59198
@newsfe22.lga:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in
news:f9dce011-543b-4876-b292-36e27975f6f1
@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com:

On May 1, 1:37 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
gatt wrote
innews:166dndmr7PzkuIfVnZ2dnUVZ_g2dn
:

seen a jet blow started! They parked another jet in fornt of it and
wound it up with the exhaust of the airplane in front.

Bertie

No, you read that in the book "Right Stuff".

-Robert



No, I didn't read the right stuff. I saw a 737 park in front of a 707
and do just that in Maidugari.



Bertie

Still lying.




Snort!

You wish wannabe boi.

Bertie

On Thu, 01 May 2008 15:54:34 -0700, gatt wrote:

Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

seen a jet blow started!

No but I knew a girl once that could probably suck start a 182.

Excellent. I wonder what could she do with a twin.

Cum Guzzling Sperm Burping Bitch (n)

The once in a lifetime act of blowing a hot steamy load down the
back of a girl's throat and then proceeding to give her a large
cold bottle of your favorite carbonated drink, making her guzzle
it down. Then, shake her head vigorously back and forth to create
the Cum Guzzling, Sperm Burping effect. A great way to impress
your friends.
--
I bought a $450,000 house for $720,000. Bright, huh?

In article
,
"Robert M. Gary" wrote:

On May 2, 1:51*pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote
:

Who's talking about yank and bank?

Oh, wait, it's you.

When I speak with the examiners I use I hear all the time that they
want stabliized approaches. They don't want much maneuvering below a
certain altitude (usually 500 feet). When I learned in the Aeronca
landing meant power to idle abeam, full slip around the turn to final
and be on the ground within seconds. That is yank-n-bank and will
never pass today.

-Robert

You are not supposed to slip in the turns; slips are reserved for final
approach adjustments to make the desired spot.

The schools don't teach airmanship -- they teach "airplane driving."

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.

Orval Fairbairn wrote in
news
In article
,
"Robert M. Gary" wrote:

On May 2, 1:51*pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote
innews:2bf535e9-1694-402e-9768-
legroups
.com:

Who's talking about yank and bank?

Oh, wait, it's you.

When I speak with the examiners I use I hear all the time that they
want stabliized approaches. They don't want much maneuvering below a
certain altitude (usually 500 feet). When I learned in the Aeronca
landing meant power to idle abeam, full slip around the turn to final
and be on the ground within seconds. That is yank-n-bank and will
never pass today.

-Robert

You are not supposed to slip in the turns; slips are reserved for
final approach adjustments to make the desired spot.

The schools don't teach airmanship -- they teach "airplane driving."


Exactly. Stabilised approaches have their place, but tgeaching them to
the exclusion of all else is robbing the student.




Bertie