A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aircraft collision over Hudson



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 8th 09, 11:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
rob
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Aircraft collision over Hudson

http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/08/08/hud...ash/index.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,538521,00.html
  #2  
Old August 9th 09, 03:34 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
a[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 562
Default Aircraft collision over Hudson

On Aug 8, 6:14*pm, rob wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/08/08/hud...538521,00.html


Radar tracks will be very interesting. My totally uninformed guess is
we will learn the swing wing as assending into the path of the
Cherokee 6. What I've read is the 6 flew into the 'copter -- be
interesting to see what the NTSB finds and as importantly recommends
so as to not have this happen again.

I'll remind readers the FARs say the aircraf, t being overtaken has
right of way of the overtaking aircraft and at tabout the same
altitude the airplane on the right has right of way.

  #3  
Old August 9th 09, 07:59 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
James Robinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 180
Default Aircraft collision over Hudson

a wrote:

Radar tracks will be very interesting. My totally uninformed guess is
we will learn the swing wing as assending into the path of the
Cherokee 6. What I've read is the 6 flew into the 'copter -- be
interesting to see what the NTSB finds and as importantly recommends
so as to not have this happen again.

I'll remind readers the FARs say the aircraf, t being overtaken has
right of way of the overtaking aircraft and at tabout the same
altitude the airplane on the right has right of way.


You can see the radar tracks on the following site:

http://www4.passur.com/ewr.html

If you start at about 11:50 AM, you can see all the aircraft in the area.
(Select the date and time, click on "Normal" then click on "Start". You
need Java, and it will take a moment to start, so be patient.)

There are northbound aircraft at 1400, 1900, and 4000 feet. They appear to
be an experimental, an Embraer, and an Airbus from the registrations and
flight numbers. You can see the helicopter rise into the path of the Piper
Lance, which approaches from the northwest at 1100 feet. The helicopter has
an airplane symbol rather than a helicopter symbol. Collision at about
11:53 AM
  #4  
Old August 9th 09, 07:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
a[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 562
Default Aircraft collision over Hudson

On Aug 9, 2:59*am, James Robinson wrote:
a wrote:

Radar tracks will be very interesting. My totally uninformed guess is
we will learn the swing wing as assending into the path of the
Cherokee 6. What I've read is the 6 flew into the 'copter -- be
interesting to see what the NTSB finds and as importantly recommends
so as to not have this happen again.


I'll remind readers the FARs say the aircraf, t being overtaken has
right of way of the overtaking aircraft and at tabout the same
altitude the airplane on the right has right of way.


You can see the radar tracks on the following site:

http://www4.passur.com/ewr.html

If you start at about 11:50 AM, you can see all the aircraft in the area.
(Select the date and time, click on "Normal" then click on "Start". *You
need Java, and it will take a moment to start, so be patient.)

There are northbound aircraft at 1400, 1900, and 4000 feet. *They appear to
be an experimental, an Embraer, and an Airbus from the registrations and
flight numbers. *You can see the helicopter rise into the path of the Piper
Lance, which approaches from the northwest at 1100 feet. The helicopter has
an airplane symbol rather than a helicopter symbol. *Collision at
11:53 AM


I don't often fly VFR, but I think a lesson here is straight and level
at low altitudes is probably not a good idea -- a long series of
clearing S turns would be safer. It would be easy for a faster
airplane to climb into me, given the Mooney's low wing and poor
downward visibility straight ahead. I could even overtake a slower
airplane climbing into my airspace and not see it.

I know the chances of a mid air are very low, but they are 100% if
it's me: no thanks!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How does aircraft speed differential relate to collision risk? Terence Wilson[_2_] General Aviation 1 March 13th 09 11:49 AM
Lockheed Hudson Glenn[_2_] Aviation Photos 6 August 29th 07 09:27 AM
lockheed Hudson Glenn[_2_] Aviation Photos 2 July 9th 07 12:11 AM
AME Hudson Valley? Schmoe Piloting 3 October 23rd 04 03:26 PM
Hudson river Paul Sengupta Piloting 2 January 9th 04 12:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.